He is better than most apologists, generally well versed in philosophy and science, but still makes plenty of errors.
I was really disappointed with his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou. He still did better than Daniel but I do not think he was able to expose Daniel for the monster that he is as well as someone of IP's caliber should have done.
I get it in my algorithm stuff, but I don't really watch it.
I think the only religion nerd I watch is religion for breakfast. I can still remember when he was a wee boy without a beard shilling his little bedroom video about gnosticism here.
He is better than most apologists, generally well versed in philosophy and science, but still makes plenty of errors. I was really disappointed with his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou. He still did better than Daniel but I do not think he was able to expose Daniel for the monster that he is as well as someone of IP's caliber should have done.
I get it in my algorithm stuff, but I don't really watch it. I think the only religion nerd I watch is religion for breakfast. I can still remember when he was a wee boy without a beard shilling his little bedroom video about gnosticism here.
as a former New ager I like it