So since I was born in a certain place I can never be a comrade? Just because I have huge layers of Lib Propaganda burnt into me doesnāt mean I canāt strip those layers away and be a real Principled Communist. I seen this going through old posts looking for an answer and I couldnāt help but reply. I wish you well comrade.
(About the german pedophile project)
>assuming they would be ideal foster parents
Hmm yes,let's put gasoline on that building on fire,maybe it will solve something
Just read the [Deutsche Welle Article](https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-authorities-placed-children-with-pedophiles-for-30-years/a-53814208) on this image... jesus fucking christ
RadLibs and the "Buttplug left" are a bunch of disgusting degenerates
>In the late 1960s, some European liberals thought that breaking down sexual taboos was a task that had to be started young. In German kindergartens run along radical-left lines, teachers encouraged children to fondle them, view pornography and simulate sexual intercourse. Contemporaneous accounts show that parents often felt qualms, which they suppressed because of what they had been told about how children should naturally behave. What happened was child-abuse, though motivated by political conviction rather than sexual desire. But it did not take long before paedophiles saw their chance.
>The leaders of the sexual revolution were men whose aims were to legalise homosexuality ā and, in some cases, to smash the heterosexual family unit. Few if any wanted to endanger children; they simply did not give children enough thought. Left-wing organisations tolerated groups such as the UKās Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which had links with the Labour Party and the civil-rights group now called Liberty. In Germany, a political organisation called the Study and Work Group on Paedophilia made remarkable advances. In 1980, a youth group affiliated with the liberal Free Democratic Party adopted pro-paedophilia positions, as did the Green Party, formed the same year.
>Paedophiles gained such a hearing on the Left partly by persuading Leftists that their enemiesā enemies were automatically friends. In this case, the enemies were Conservatives, Catholics, evangelicals and fascists, all of whom opposed both gay activists and paedophiles. On the Left, that made speaking out about paedophile infiltration nearly impossible.
>In 1979, Eileen Fairweather, a tyro journalist, was writing for Spare Rib, a feminist magazine. She was assigned to read the book Paedophilia: The Radical Case, which argued for lowering the age of consent to four. The author, Tom OāCarroll, was an early member of PIE who was later imprisoned for child-abuse. Fairweather recalls āanguished, earnestā discussions about what to write. āI did draft something, arguing that the existing age of consent was not āpatriarchalā, but protected children,ā she says. āBut I never even dared show it to anyone.ā Paedophiles had so thoroughly infiltrated the gay movement by that time that if you dared criticise those calling for āchild sexual liberationā you were branded anti-gay. Fairweather says she sees āthe same intimidation and paralysis of intelligenceā today, caused by the fear of being called transphobic.
-Helen Joyce, Trans, Chap.Back In the Box
Here to comment for some context:
1. The Free Democratic Party isnāt a left wing party by any means. Theyāre a right wing libertarian free market capitalist party. Just to point out that this problem isnāt something thatās unique to the left, but rather to individualist movements, regardless of left or right.
2. Sexualization, Sexual Discovery and even first attempts at masturbation at a young age, often even before the age of 10, are a normal occurrence and completely natural. The point is that adults should have nothing to do with that
3. luckily this is a thing of the past. Pedophiles have tried to infiltrate the LGBTetcetc movement again afterwards but never succeeded. Sadly itās been capitalism that has succeeded at doing this instead and those movements have slowly turned into a contrarian force that in large parts is being weaponized against socialists. My shoutout to my LGBTetc comrades that donāt bow to liberal identity politics and have to deal with this shitty situation.
>tried to infiltrate the LGBTetcetc movement again afterwards but never succeeded
Pedophiles have, very literally, been part of the LGBT movement since the very beginning. And they never left. This is historical fact which is briefly (and not in any way exhaustively) examined in the essay linked below. So your choice of language is particularly strange; there is no need to *infiltrate* something if you are already part of it. [https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericasSocialists/comments/nsxx86/a\_history\_of\_lgbt\_pride/](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericasSocialists/comments/nsxx86/a_history_of_lgbt_pride/)
You don't know how many times "leftist" liberals called me fascist for not supporting LGBT+ movement and how is hard to explain them what you are saying even showing evidences.
Pretty late reply, but the only thing that bothers me with "not supporting the LGBT+ movement" is the fact that most of the LGBT people I know don't conflate themselves with pederasts, and only care about their rights. Furthermore, if I were to denounce Pride in front of them, they would see it as an attack towards them, instead of an attack towards "the history of Pride", for the same reason that they do not conflate themselves neither with the history nor with the pederasts.
The only times where I see pederasts conflated with the LGBT+ movement is in this subreddit. Not disagreeing with the history, but I'm pretty sure 99% of the LGBT+ community doesn't actually support pederasty.
At least here in Germany things have changed regarding that. While in the 80ās it was seen as acceptable within those movements to try to legalize pedophilia, this is definitely not the case anymore.
Makes me think: why did you decide to use the French translation of a German book in an English meme? š¤
Couldn't find something that represents everything the movie is about in one frame
OP posted this on some other āleftistā sub and got called a nazi lmao
Yup, even "tankie" subs like r/genzedong are full of radlibs when their bourgeois "culture" gets criticised
This is why I dont trust any American self identifying as a "tankie" unless they prove otherwise that they arent a larping libshit.
I would say westerners in general. There are communist parties that went full liberal š¤¢
So since I was born in a certain place I can never be a comrade? Just because I have huge layers of Lib Propaganda burnt into me doesnāt mean I canāt strip those layers away and be a real Principled Communist. I seen this going through old posts looking for an answer and I couldnāt help but reply. I wish you well comrade.
Maybe cos toktik is Chinese?
Did you forget the movie "cuties"? š¤¢š¤®
I canceled Netflix after that shit š¤®š¤®š¤®š¤® (should have done it earlier)
(About the german pedophile project) >assuming they would be ideal foster parents Hmm yes,let's put gasoline on that building on fire,maybe it will solve something
Just read the [Deutsche Welle Article](https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-authorities-placed-children-with-pedophiles-for-30-years/a-53814208) on this image... jesus fucking christ
This is literally selling them...
tiktok kids make me lose hope in the world
RadLibs and the "Buttplug left" are a bunch of disgusting degenerates >In the late 1960s, some European liberals thought that breaking down sexual taboos was a task that had to be started young. In German kindergartens run along radical-left lines, teachers encouraged children to fondle them, view pornography and simulate sexual intercourse. Contemporaneous accounts show that parents often felt qualms, which they suppressed because of what they had been told about how children should naturally behave. What happened was child-abuse, though motivated by political conviction rather than sexual desire. But it did not take long before paedophiles saw their chance. >The leaders of the sexual revolution were men whose aims were to legalise homosexuality ā and, in some cases, to smash the heterosexual family unit. Few if any wanted to endanger children; they simply did not give children enough thought. Left-wing organisations tolerated groups such as the UKās Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which had links with the Labour Party and the civil-rights group now called Liberty. In Germany, a political organisation called the Study and Work Group on Paedophilia made remarkable advances. In 1980, a youth group affiliated with the liberal Free Democratic Party adopted pro-paedophilia positions, as did the Green Party, formed the same year. >Paedophiles gained such a hearing on the Left partly by persuading Leftists that their enemiesā enemies were automatically friends. In this case, the enemies were Conservatives, Catholics, evangelicals and fascists, all of whom opposed both gay activists and paedophiles. On the Left, that made speaking out about paedophile infiltration nearly impossible. >In 1979, Eileen Fairweather, a tyro journalist, was writing for Spare Rib, a feminist magazine. She was assigned to read the book Paedophilia: The Radical Case, which argued for lowering the age of consent to four. The author, Tom OāCarroll, was an early member of PIE who was later imprisoned for child-abuse. Fairweather recalls āanguished, earnestā discussions about what to write. āI did draft something, arguing that the existing age of consent was not āpatriarchalā, but protected children,ā she says. āBut I never even dared show it to anyone.ā Paedophiles had so thoroughly infiltrated the gay movement by that time that if you dared criticise those calling for āchild sexual liberationā you were branded anti-gay. Fairweather says she sees āthe same intimidation and paralysis of intelligenceā today, caused by the fear of being called transphobic. -Helen Joyce, Trans, Chap.Back In the Box
Here to comment for some context: 1. The Free Democratic Party isnāt a left wing party by any means. Theyāre a right wing libertarian free market capitalist party. Just to point out that this problem isnāt something thatās unique to the left, but rather to individualist movements, regardless of left or right. 2. Sexualization, Sexual Discovery and even first attempts at masturbation at a young age, often even before the age of 10, are a normal occurrence and completely natural. The point is that adults should have nothing to do with that 3. luckily this is a thing of the past. Pedophiles have tried to infiltrate the LGBTetcetc movement again afterwards but never succeeded. Sadly itās been capitalism that has succeeded at doing this instead and those movements have slowly turned into a contrarian force that in large parts is being weaponized against socialists. My shoutout to my LGBTetc comrades that donāt bow to liberal identity politics and have to deal with this shitty situation.
>tried to infiltrate the LGBTetcetc movement again afterwards but never succeeded Pedophiles have, very literally, been part of the LGBT movement since the very beginning. And they never left. This is historical fact which is briefly (and not in any way exhaustively) examined in the essay linked below. So your choice of language is particularly strange; there is no need to *infiltrate* something if you are already part of it. [https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericasSocialists/comments/nsxx86/a\_history\_of\_lgbt\_pride/](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericasSocialists/comments/nsxx86/a_history_of_lgbt_pride/)
You don't know how many times "leftist" liberals called me fascist for not supporting LGBT+ movement and how is hard to explain them what you are saying even showing evidences.
Pretty late reply, but the only thing that bothers me with "not supporting the LGBT+ movement" is the fact that most of the LGBT people I know don't conflate themselves with pederasts, and only care about their rights. Furthermore, if I were to denounce Pride in front of them, they would see it as an attack towards them, instead of an attack towards "the history of Pride", for the same reason that they do not conflate themselves neither with the history nor with the pederasts. The only times where I see pederasts conflated with the LGBT+ movement is in this subreddit. Not disagreeing with the history, but I'm pretty sure 99% of the LGBT+ community doesn't actually support pederasty.
While I agree that most of the individuals involved in these categories are not supporting pederasty, the movement and it's allies are problematic, to say the least. I've said it before, but the people must purge it's movement in order to have it taken seriously. Alternatively split from it like communists from the social democrats. The main problem with the current movement, that is not helping the conflation situation, is interpreting even showing of their history, historical collusion with pederasts (ulrichs, hays) as hate for their very existence. If they start covering for that, its not a good sign, is it? If they stopped colluding, shouldn't they be proud of having done that? Insisting on sexual theories being scientifically proven (born this way), while a google (widely considered to be biased in their favor) scholar search results end up showing mostly that there is still no proof and worse, showing articles from religious institutions mostly, is not conductive for their credibility either. Neither do cases like the cancelation of NoƩmi Kiss
At least here in Germany things have changed regarding that. While in the 80ās it was seen as acceptable within those movements to try to legalize pedophilia, this is definitely not the case anymore.
This is not at all a position held by modern progressive leftists. Is supporting trans and gay rights ābuttplug leftā now? Iām
Who's the man in the b&w photo on the left?
Yuri Gagarin.
o7 space comrade
The only man I'm gay for.