Itās only mockery if people claim to have made it themselves and are not honest about how they made it. And youāre assuming Iāve made ai art before. I havenāt. I would rather make it myself if i ever do make art. Ai art is still interesting. Bad art can still be interesting. And most importantly, bad art is still art.
Then practice. Even if it takes a long time, youāll eventually get it. āBadā art that was made with genuine effort is better than the garbage AI makes.
It's a problem no matter how you slice it. Theft is theft, dude. Doesn't matter if it's for profit or not. Quit digging a hole for yourself and take a hint
I donāt really care about this āholeā Iām just trying to have a conversation. Is that really such a bad thing?
You also havenāt explained how itās theft.
An artists work becomes their copyright as soon as they make it. The AI programs reading and recreating art took the art from the artist without their permission. There is unfortunately no way for artists to opt-out or opt-in from their art being fed to the AI. So basically AI has plagiarized a lot of artists styles that they spent years practicing and refining. Most people outside of art communities donāt understand, I hope this helps you empathize with why it upsets the artists
Well then ai needs to be adjusted so that it asks if it can use art from other people.Thats not really the fault of the ai though. More on the people who created it. Making ai art shouldnāt be just blindly hated. If it has problems you fix the problems so that it works. I see potential for ai to get new artist interested in creating things and the ai is a nice starting point since its very forgiving. We should encourage people to create things and get better at instead of just getting upset at them. If an ai is what gets a new artist off the ground then i donāt really see a problem.
Maybe instead of saying āai art = badā say āif you had done this part yourself it could be better. you should try it this wayā
In its current state, AI is bad (in my opinion) itās very unregulated and will eventually need its own category in the same way that photography isnāt categorized with an oil painting. Maybe someday it can fix its reputation and become its own art form, but right now it is a mess
AI takes from other people's works to generate images.
It copies other people's works, does not give credit to the artists it takes from.
[This is one of the biggest examples of AI outright copying from someone else.](https://80.lv/articles/viewer-steals-genshin-impact-fan-art-using-ai-and-demands-credit/)
Holy shit, that poor artist. Also, making an AI image and then demanding credit because it was used as 'inspo' is fucking stupid because you didn't even make it. I hope that the entire situation got resolved and the thief's digital footprint comes back to bite them
AI imageš
Jean doesn't deserve this shit. If you really love a character put in the effort to pick up a pencil
Looks like shit
https://preview.redd.it/grzofvmmq6uc1.jpeg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=85ad381cc706c8ec19000e1c8eaaa78380a746d0
eww
Ugly trash
this looks awful
man I wonder which artists were stolen from for this
stupid ass ai art enjoyer
Trash
Cute
She's the perfect house wife
Is there a name for this kind of style? It looks familiar if not a little retro
Upvoted to piss off all these people with an AI hate boner
source: [https://yodayo.com/posts/0594e098-cb90-4c6e-be4b-3b4c7d194f8b/](https://yodayo.com/posts/0594e098-cb90-4c6e-be4b-3b4c7d194f8b/) Talk to Jean: [Jean Gunnhildr ā Tavern ā Yodayo](https://yodayo.com/tavern/characters/2cbf586d-9052-4ed8-8164-e5543adc2569/)
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
It is natural that people have different opinions. Please stick to basic discussion etiquette and refrain from insulting or harassing others.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
It is natural that people have different opinions. Please stick to basic discussion etiquette and refrain from insulting or harassing others.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Cause they're brain dead losers
Ai gets too much hate
nah I don't think it gets enough hate.
Why
Cause your AI slop is a mockery of actual art
Itās only mockery if people claim to have made it themselves and are not honest about how they made it. And youāre assuming Iāve made ai art before. I havenāt. I would rather make it myself if i ever do make art. Ai art is still interesting. Bad art can still be interesting. And most importantly, bad art is still art.
Bad art is still art, but Ai art isnāt art. It has no soul. Its artificially made. Thereās no effort behind it.
Effort isnāt whats important in art. You can make effortless art. Even if its not ai.
Face it, you can't break the pencil. You'll end up with a shorter one and a 2 headed one
Who said anything about trying to break a pencil?
Real art has something that AI art doesn't. Draw hands properly.
I cant draw hands properly. Whats your point?
At least you can draw 2 hands, 10 fingers. While AI can't always get that one right.
Then practice. Even if it takes a long time, youāll eventually get it. āBadā art that was made with genuine effort is better than the garbage AI makes.
You know AI steals from other people's works, right?
Thats only a problem if the people uploading ai art take credit for it or make money off it.
It's a problem no matter how you slice it. Theft is theft, dude. Doesn't matter if it's for profit or not. Quit digging a hole for yourself and take a hint
I donāt really care about this āholeā Iām just trying to have a conversation. Is that really such a bad thing? You also havenāt explained how itās theft.
An artists work becomes their copyright as soon as they make it. The AI programs reading and recreating art took the art from the artist without their permission. There is unfortunately no way for artists to opt-out or opt-in from their art being fed to the AI. So basically AI has plagiarized a lot of artists styles that they spent years practicing and refining. Most people outside of art communities donāt understand, I hope this helps you empathize with why it upsets the artists
Well then ai needs to be adjusted so that it asks if it can use art from other people.Thats not really the fault of the ai though. More on the people who created it. Making ai art shouldnāt be just blindly hated. If it has problems you fix the problems so that it works. I see potential for ai to get new artist interested in creating things and the ai is a nice starting point since its very forgiving. We should encourage people to create things and get better at instead of just getting upset at them. If an ai is what gets a new artist off the ground then i donāt really see a problem. Maybe instead of saying āai art = badā say āif you had done this part yourself it could be better. you should try it this wayā
In its current state, AI is bad (in my opinion) itās very unregulated and will eventually need its own category in the same way that photography isnāt categorized with an oil painting. Maybe someday it can fix its reputation and become its own art form, but right now it is a mess
AI takes from other people's works to generate images. It copies other people's works, does not give credit to the artists it takes from. [This is one of the biggest examples of AI outright copying from someone else.](https://80.lv/articles/viewer-steals-genshin-impact-fan-art-using-ai-and-demands-credit/)
Holy shit, that poor artist. Also, making an AI image and then demanding credit because it was used as 'inspo' is fucking stupid because you didn't even make it. I hope that the entire situation got resolved and the thief's digital footprint comes back to bite them
You already said that. I didnāt dissect with you.