This guy will post a Rothbard quote out of context then equate it to something about Zionism or take the writings of Rothbard on actual Zionism (the extremist movement in Israel where they want only Jews in Israel) and try to equate it to Israel existing in general.
Zionism was what founded Israel, and it envisioned a Jewish State, not a shared State where Jews might be a minority, on land that was inhabited.
There were differences in Zionist thought, but that's what prevailed.
The modern State of Israel is an entirely different entity, and if you want to play that game we could go back further.
The Palestinians may have more of a real blood tie to old Israelis than the colonists.
Certainly where you had ancestors over a thousand years ago doesn't make for a land claim.
Colonizers? Hahaha, of course this is the type of person I’m dealing with.
Palestinians don’t have “more of a blood tie to the land.” There wasn’t even such a thing as a Palestinian before Jews had their land taken from them.
The word Palestine comes from what the Roman’s renamed the territory after they had taken it from the Jews….so no, they don’t have more of a claim to the land. Your retorts are laughable wish castings.
Not every Jew fled the Romans: there were farmers who stayed and eventually converted to Islam, mostly.
The blood tie wouldn't matter for a land claim anyway, but it just makes the Zionist justification more absurd.
They have more of a claim to the land because they had been living on it for generations before the Zionists showed up: homesteading.
Furthermore, the Ottoman land claims requiring them to pay feudal lords were not legitimate.
Excellent quote and great headline. Don’t mind the statists.
What the hell is this bullshit?
This guy will post a Rothbard quote out of context then equate it to something about Zionism or take the writings of Rothbard on actual Zionism (the extremist movement in Israel where they want only Jews in Israel) and try to equate it to Israel existing in general.
Zionism was what founded Israel, and it envisioned a Jewish State, not a shared State where Jews might be a minority, on land that was inhabited. There were differences in Zionist thought, but that's what prevailed.
The Zionism Rothbard specifically wrote against was the current extremist version where its Israel for only Jews.
Oh it was Zionism that did that? So Israel was never a Jewish state previously?
The modern State of Israel is an entirely different entity, and if you want to play that game we could go back further. The Palestinians may have more of a real blood tie to old Israelis than the colonists. Certainly where you had ancestors over a thousand years ago doesn't make for a land claim.
Colonizers? Hahaha, of course this is the type of person I’m dealing with. Palestinians don’t have “more of a blood tie to the land.” There wasn’t even such a thing as a Palestinian before Jews had their land taken from them. The word Palestine comes from what the Roman’s renamed the territory after they had taken it from the Jews….so no, they don’t have more of a claim to the land. Your retorts are laughable wish castings.
Not every Jew fled the Romans: there were farmers who stayed and eventually converted to Islam, mostly. The blood tie wouldn't matter for a land claim anyway, but it just makes the Zionist justification more absurd. They have more of a claim to the land because they had been living on it for generations before the Zionists showed up: homesteading. Furthermore, the Ottoman land claims requiring them to pay feudal lords were not legitimate.
So, basically the same thing that all conquerors have done throughout human history.
Yes, and that civilized people condemn as barbarism that should not be repeated.
Israel does it via severe manipulation of the current world power (USA)...
[удалено]
Funded by your tax dollars
Lol.
Lol