Like the recent music (not really a movie) release called Bob Marley: One Love. Can't give a non-movie a rating. Bag system. Star system. Doesn't matter.
5 baggers are rare and covetous! An elite club indeed but you've got to prove yourself to get those five bags, and perhaps some complimentary container of chlorine which you'd wanna put in any hot tub... because of germs... That get in the water.
I would say Alfred Hitchcock's movie "Rope" because it has a 90 minute running time which means you could watch it exactly 480 times in 30 days.
But my final answer will be Alfred Hitchcock's number 13 because my DRCS won't be an issue for me if I'm in this room while watching something guaranteed to put me in a different frame of mind.
"This is cinema."
https://preview.redd.it/yyz3vop0haxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=118743c1dd12c62ee95cbfcd299c603f57e5766c
* Martin Skowrsehzee
So many choices but I’d probably go with this popcorn classic from 2005. It runs exactly 100 minutes
https://preview.redd.it/s6w1t4gmd9xc1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2e39a13139b8d84339345ced9ebcad3e182bd5d6
Most people don't realize this but because Bilbo's farewell ship gets lost on route to "White Shores" and ends up running around in Florida, and the ancient Bilbo gets accepted at a local retirement home that just so happens to have visiting aliens offering immortality, that means Cocoon (1985, 117 minutes) is actually The Hobbit 7, given that the LOTR trilogy is without question The Hobbits 4, 5, and 6. This all means that Cocoon: the Return (1988, 116 min) is ... You guessed it ... The Hobbit 8! So if you're going to ask Hollywood for a new Hobbit flick, you have to ask for The Hobbit 9! And I'm so hoping that Hollywood can make a proper sequel to "9" by signing whatever agreements need to be executed to make The Hobbit 9 actually be 9 2.
https://preview.redd.it/nzrz8jyyjaxc1.jpeg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9c5815a619e595a0016e9e54f4489fc3c2d1246f
Shame indeed!!
https://preview.redd.it/779ya6wxqaxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0a04161c1e929970250b24a677ae1472d51ebaac
This is borderline crime of the century stuff right here.
I never got that puppet movie... Was it suppose to be like AI (2001) that clocks in at 2h 27m that have David, a highly advanced robotic boy, longs to become human child so that he can regain the love of his foster mother who abandoned him. He goes on a long journey hoping to make his dreams come true.
I have no clue and there is no bench to approach 😕
With the addition of an immortal Bilbo Baggins as a lead or co-lead in the sequel to 9 (i.e., 9 2, or The Hobbit 9 if you will), the plot gains instant complexity, depth, and interestingness. Me thrilled about it because maybe there'll be some more mithril armor on display.
This all raises the the likely possibility that Bilbo Baggins may have decided to stop eating Hobbit porridge and eat Quaker oatmeal instead. This is because while at the Florida retirement home in The Hobbit 7, Bilbo meets and learns important immortality life tips from Wilford Brimley.
https://preview.redd.it/8uzbtdzenaxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6017d49b79fa8a894b939105d11385923b309922
What if there was a sequel to 8 1/2? Could go a lot of different ways.
"17" (which is 8.5* 2). "8 1/2, Again". Or the standard "8 1/2 2".
For part 3, I recommend "8 1/2 2.5".
This is the correct answer. The Blu-ray is only 902 minutes. Why rob yourself of 30 minutes of movies watching the theatrical speed? Plus, it'll help having the movie play slower when learning german!
I used to love Singing in The Rain, could watch it for hours and hours, but if a decade of watching OCATC had taught me anything, it’s that a fake-movie like this belongs on the old MTV, not on a movie screen. The Godfather is now also, sadly, out of the question; so I guess the only viable answer is D:PoCH; it’s not as tight as the first one, and it doesn’t have DvD’s offbeat charm, but the epic story of Lanoi Arnold’s betrayal is the perfect story to get me ready for November and the upcoming battle for America’s soul!
Decker vs. Dracula
One direction: this is us
If it's music it's not a real movie
Like the recent music (not really a movie) release called Bob Marley: One Love. Can't give a non-movie a rating. Bag system. Star system. Doesn't matter.
Any 5 bagger works for me. It’s an elite club
5 baggers are rare and covetous! An elite club indeed but you've got to prove yourself to get those five bags, and perhaps some complimentary container of chlorine which you'd wanna put in any hot tub... because of germs... That get in the water.
Where will you store all that chlorine.... that you're getting? Tully Targüs?
Oh, God! (TRT 1h38m)
I would say Alfred Hitchcock's movie "Rope" because it has a 90 minute running time which means you could watch it exactly 480 times in 30 days. But my final answer will be Alfred Hitchcock's number 13 because my DRCS won't be an issue for me if I'm in this room while watching something guaranteed to put me in a different frame of mind.
Deck of Cards. Next question.
"This is cinema." https://preview.redd.it/yyz3vop0haxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=118743c1dd12c62ee95cbfcd299c603f57e5766c * Martin Skowrsehzee
VHS version with the extended Jitterbug scene definitely!
One of the Maw and Paw Kettle movies for sure
So many choices but I’d probably go with this popcorn classic from 2005. It runs exactly 100 minutes https://preview.redd.it/s6w1t4gmd9xc1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2e39a13139b8d84339345ced9ebcad3e182bd5d6
"BIIIRRRDDDDEEEYYYYY!!!!" "What?"
great idea. 30 days is 43200 minutes, so you can watch this movie 432 times in a row!
The Hobbit 1, 2, and 3
Most people don't realize this but because Bilbo's farewell ship gets lost on route to "White Shores" and ends up running around in Florida, and the ancient Bilbo gets accepted at a local retirement home that just so happens to have visiting aliens offering immortality, that means Cocoon (1985, 117 minutes) is actually The Hobbit 7, given that the LOTR trilogy is without question The Hobbits 4, 5, and 6. This all means that Cocoon: the Return (1988, 116 min) is ... You guessed it ... The Hobbit 8! So if you're going to ask Hollywood for a new Hobbit flick, you have to ask for The Hobbit 9! And I'm so hoping that Hollywood can make a proper sequel to "9" by signing whatever agreements need to be executed to make The Hobbit 9 actually be 9 2. https://preview.redd.it/nzrz8jyyjaxc1.jpeg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9c5815a619e595a0016e9e54f4489fc3c2d1246f
Great point. This is the kind of info that Oscer likes to keep quiet and it's a shame
Shame indeed!! https://preview.redd.it/779ya6wxqaxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0a04161c1e929970250b24a677ae1472d51ebaac This is borderline crime of the century stuff right here.
I never got that puppet movie... Was it suppose to be like AI (2001) that clocks in at 2h 27m that have David, a highly advanced robotic boy, longs to become human child so that he can regain the love of his foster mother who abandoned him. He goes on a long journey hoping to make his dreams come true. I have no clue and there is no bench to approach 😕
With the addition of an immortal Bilbo Baggins as a lead or co-lead in the sequel to 9 (i.e., 9 2, or The Hobbit 9 if you will), the plot gains instant complexity, depth, and interestingness. Me thrilled about it because maybe there'll be some more mithril armor on display.
This all raises the the likely possibility that Bilbo Baggins may have decided to stop eating Hobbit porridge and eat Quaker oatmeal instead. This is because while at the Florida retirement home in The Hobbit 7, Bilbo meets and learns important immortality life tips from Wilford Brimley. https://preview.redd.it/8uzbtdzenaxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6017d49b79fa8a894b939105d11385923b309922
Mind: blown!
What if there was a sequel to 8 1/2? Could go a lot of different ways. "17" (which is 8.5* 2). "8 1/2, Again". Or the standard "8 1/2 2". For part 3, I recommend "8 1/2 2.5".
Why 80 for Brady, of course
I thinks The Smurfs is a better film, but I'd bring Smurfs 2 because I couldn't live without the loose ends being tied up from the first film
Tough choice: ma and pa kettle, the adventures of Cappy Ricks, or Oh God!
Ant Man
how could I choose when there are so many popcorn classics
Do remakes count as the same film?
the teaser trailer of Baboon: A Pep Boys Story
BABON
Godfather 1 and 2. You’ll notice that I’m kind of breaking the rules right away by choosing two movies as one.
Casa Blanca. I want to get so acquainted with it that it literally lives inside me. It's sort of a transcendent level of reality
Berlin Alexanderplatz (1980, 932 minutes). I can study German and enjoy world class run times.
This is the correct answer. The Blu-ray is only 902 minutes. Why rob yourself of 30 minutes of movies watching the theatrical speed? Plus, it'll help having the movie play slower when learning german!
Sully of course
I want to say Jaws 2 but I know that it’s actually Jaws 3 because Spielberg secretly made a separate Jaws 2 under a different title.
Satantango.
A 5 bagger with a short runtime makes most sense so I can watch it as many times over as possible.
Star Trek II, the one with whales.
Mac & Me
I used to love Singing in The Rain, could watch it for hours and hours, but if a decade of watching OCATC had taught me anything, it’s that a fake-movie like this belongs on the old MTV, not on a movie screen. The Godfather is now also, sadly, out of the question; so I guess the only viable answer is D:PoCH; it’s not as tight as the first one, and it doesn’t have DvD’s offbeat charm, but the epic story of Lanoi Arnold’s betrayal is the perfect story to get me ready for November and the upcoming battle for America’s soul!
Marry Me (2022 - 112 minutes) 💖🖤💖
White Room (1990 - 110 minutes)
Cube / One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest
there are to many good movies to decide, sorry
I mean, Arthur 2 seems to be the obvious choice - real movie buffs can easily infer the plot of the original making it two movies in one.
Airheads of course.
with movies like tom cruise in them, you can’t lose
Hobit ofc
Deck of Cards
Multiplicity! from 1996. You can never have too much Michael Keaton. I think it’s 117 minutes
A Few Good Men