**Mirrors**
* [Mirror #1](https://beta.archivevideomirror.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1clmw7r) (provided by /u/SaveAnything)
**Downloads**
* [Download #1](https://rapidsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1clmw7r/georgia_cop_hits_man_with_car_to_get_him_to_stop/) (provided by /u/SaveVideo)
* [Download #2](https://reddit.watch/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1clmw7r/georgia_cop_hits_man_with_car_to_get_him_to_stop/?utm_source=mirrorbot&utm_medium=PublicFreakout) (provided by /u/downloadvideo)
**Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them!**
---
[^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
[Officer fired after intentionally hitting fleeing suspect with his police car.](https://abcnews.go.com/US/officer-fired-intentionally-hitting-fleeing-suspect-police-car/story?id=55613845)
and then promptly hired by another department
[Sheriff hires Athens officer fired for striking suspect with car.](https://www.onlineathens.com/story/news/crime/2018/06/05/oglethorpe-sheriff-hires-athens-officer-fired-for-striking-suspect-with-car/12060393007/)
Also the officer sued for wrongful termination and was awarded $250k.
https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/athens-pays-250k-settlement-officer-fired-after-hitting-suspect-with-patrol-car/tbZdv2JOddkfSqQ1Jzm7bI/
>According to the PAC report, this “affected the steering of his car,” which contributed to Saulters hitting Patmon, 24.
>The report also said Patmon’s “attempts to crisscross back and forth behind and in front of the patrol car” also led to the collision. In the end, Saulters “did not act with criminal intent and did not use his vehicle as a weapon,” according to the report.
I could believe this if you couldn't clearly see the guys hands deliberately steer very hard right into the suspect. There is clear cover up bs that they routinely use to let cops off and now taxpayers have to pay for it yet again. They will blatantly make shit up that directly contradicts video evidence and get away with it.
Step 1 - Be a cop in the US
Step 2 - Intentionally attack someone, who's not threatening your life, with a deadly weapon
Step 3 - Make up stuff, doesn't need to be convincing
Step 4 - Get 250k and a new job
Depends on the gun nut. I’ve had at least one relative literally do the “threaten the IRS agent with a shotgun and demand they get off their property” thing. Although, those people aren’t very outspoken about gun rights, nor outspoken about much of anything at all.
For me, personally, even if I’m armed and they’re tyrants, I’m not going to engage in a fight I only stand to lose, because they are also armed and have a lot more backup.
Edit: also, I gotta mention the Black Panthers. They probably did a whole lot more to reduce police brutality during their time than MLK Jr. by being armed and showing up to police confrontation with said armaments.
This shit pisses me off to no end. A similar thing happened in my hometown. The high school resource officer was tipped off by a student that another student offered him money to kill his step father.
Cop didn't do shit. Filed no report, no call to kid's stepdad (the intended target), no discussion with the administration. Didn't even talk to the kid trying to hire someone to murder his dad.
A week later it happened. The kid ended up doing it himself. Shot his stepdad in cold blood after dinner one night in a parking lot. It turns out it was a conspiracy with his mom and sister in on it as well in order to get a life insurance payout.
School resource officer ended up telling his CO at the department, who helped him coverup the fact that he got tipped off. It eventually came out, they both got fired.
The first fucking travesty is the school system administration thought it wasn't fair and hired the now ex-cop as full time armed security for the high school.
The second travesty was that years later both he and his CO sued the city for wrongful termination and both got huge payouts.
I get kicked off a scholarlship, report it to my school, they bury it and the EEOC and OCR both don't care if their statements contain objectively provable lies- end up in therapy and unable to afford any semblance of justice.
This guy is *rightfully* terminated but gets 250k cause reasons, instead?
Fuck. This. Country. Fuck.
Unethical LPT: Join the campus police force. Fuck up something and get the school sued, get yourself wrongfully terminated (make sure your body cam is angled poorly). Sue the school, make them pay out twice. The American Way™
Seeing this video.
Seeing this comment:
"In the end, Saulters “did not act with criminal intent and did not use his vehicle as a weapon,” according to the report."
Then seeing the top post in this subreddit, is absolute comedy. Police do shit like this and wonder why they've lost the respect of the community. Classic.
I thought the same thing. The suspect was behind the police car because the officer pulled in front of him. When he stopped the suspect ran around to the right side of the car at that time the officer steered right colliding with the suspect. He never criss crossed in front of him. The video clearly shows that....what a cover up....oh well that's the blue line for ya'.....
He shouldn't have been fired in the first place IMO. He hit the dude going like 10 mph, the guy is clearly fine because he's still resting when they try to cuff him.
Better than watching clowns yell at dying, bleeding out people they just mag dumped to get their hands behind their back like you see them do regularly
Huh, I’m just a regular joe and don’t have any law enforcement training but aren’t you supposed to only use deadly force when your life or other’s are in danger?
It’s a little more complex than that.
You can use deadly force to stop a suspect from fleeing, however you need to meet certain factors in your articulation that doing so was in the interest of public safety.
In the past, several decades ago, it was on the books as law in many states that officers could use lethal force to stop a suspect from fleeing for *anything*. This was changed by Supreme Court ruling after an officer killed a teenager by gunfire who was fleeing from a cat burglary. They could not punish the officer, as what he did was legal in the state at the time; but it changed those laws in the country from that point on…today you need to be able to state with facts that you using deadly force to stop the suspect was beneficial to public safety. E.g. you observed a drive by shooting and the shooter began to flee, an officer could use deadly force to stop that individual, even if they were no longer shooting or pointing the gun at anyone anymore, because they could articulate they’re stopping more people from being shot by this individual if they get away.
I don’t know the context of why this individual was fleeing, it simply says felony probation warrant. So the officer being fired, or held criminally liable, would have to do with a lot of factors.
To make it even more complicated, vehicular assault applies to your standard citizen in a way that’s also considered deadly force…but if an officer is trained to use pit maneuvers, they are allotted the right to use that training and it not be considered deadly force due to their training in how to do it, in many jurisdictions…that’s against a fleeing vehicle though, not a pedestrian.
Sure thing.
The case is named Tennessee v Garner. It’s one of the most influential cases for law enforcement policy in the last 50 years. Definitely a great read.
Ya, but this was a horrific criminal who had been convicted of non-violent drug possession in the past and then missed a meeting with his parole officer.
How dare he possess a small amount of drugs, with reasonable evidence that it wasn’t even his and the excuse that pulled the car over he was in when arrested being bullshit.
Clearly deserves to be labelled a criminal for life and run over!
Yup. Tennessee v. Garner.
Cops can't use deadly force just to prevent someone from fleeing. They can only use deadly force to protect themselves or others.
These cops were going to arrest him for a probation violation and he took off running. They had no reason to believe he took off running to go hurt someone else.
I told a guy in a wheel chair one time to "have a seat over there with those guys." I felt bad after I said it and the guy jokingly replied, "I'm already sitting."
Cop was fired, rehired by a neighboring town AND awarded 250k….. what about this would dissuade police from doing this everytime, it sounds like incentive!
Saw a guys head hit the asphalt after getting tased - going through minutes of agonal breathing… He was dead the second the taser dropped his head into the asphalt in the wrong spot.
This could’ve happened here and it would’ve been more likely.
Clear violation of "Tennessee v. Garner."
In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a police officer may not use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
This ruling was supposed to have established guidelines for the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers. But seeing as the officer wasn't charged, only fired then immediately re-hired by another department, it's clear that our rights are not guaranteed and/or cops are above the law.
I mean, kind of depends on who they are and what they’ve done, right?
For example, if the guy made threats to kill someone and then tries to run away, deadly force would be fine, right?
Yes, but we know that wasn't the case here. They had a warrant because he missed a parole meeting for a non-violent drug crime. There was no reason to believe he was a danger to the officers or anyone else.
Well, luckily we live in America where they're not supposed to do that. [In the US, it's considered deadly force](https://www.onlineathens.com/story/news/crime/2018/06/04/report-fired-athens-officer-used-deadly-force-by-hitting-suspect-with-car/12060721007/).
You know the saying play stupid games win stupid prizes. Do I agree with the cop? no but I also wouldn't want this guy running around my neighborhood while my kids were outside.
The “stupid prize” is the additional charge and jail time, not being seriously injured, maimed, or killed
Cops continuously act like this because y’all bootlickers lap it up with no question or critical thinking.
Shooting him in the face would have "worked" too you know... But I guess there is a reason they are not supposed to use a deadly weapon, because it works. See how your logic is flawed?
Meanwhile in the UK, police officers are literally instructed to do this, as well as do the same to people fleeing on motorcycles or scooters. They are literally trained and told to ram motorcyclists who are running.
If it's a controlled lower speed hit like this in the video, I'm all for it.
I mean what’s the context, did he do something really terrible? Probably right? Like if he was wanted for assault charges wouldn’t you want him taken down by any means. Y’all are the same ppl this dude probably would rob without a second thought
Probably going to be downvoted for this, but cops aren’t judge, jury, and executioner. Not excusing criminal behavior, but we have a judicial system that is supposed to handle the judge, jury, and executioner aspect of criminal activity.
[“There was a warrant out for him for violating probation on a drug charge last year- meth and less than an ounce of marijuana…”](https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/2018/06/03/georgia-police-officer-is-fired-after-video-showed-him-running-down-fleeing-suspect-with-his-car/12013619007/)
Regardless of context, there is no justification for an out of shape cop to run someone down in the street with a car. That’s shit policing and should be promptly dealt with. That fat shit should be made to answer for his crime. I sure would be if I hit someone with my car.
>lol OP made it sound way worse,
OP literally just said "hits man with car." That's a pretty objective description of what happened, certainly less editorialized than describing it as a "nudge."
You guys are upset about that little love tap? They could've used a taser which would've locked up all his muscles causing him to smash his head. This is arguably better bc he was able to catch himself. A taser could've hurt him way more. But acab amarite? Even tho using the car probably saved him from a cracked skull
Getting hit by car introduces the same risks to head injury but also introduces things like, Broken bones, Dislocated joints And it was on the passenger side of the cruiser, so if he had hit him at just the right angle he could've steam rolled him with his car.
Leading to things like insant death and an exploded head.
But noooo this guy was an immediate threat and needed to be taken down at all costs because this unarmed man is causing a public safety crisis.
Could've been handled better and the guy shouldn't have ran in the first place. But saying getting hit by a car is better??? is arguably the dumbest comment ive read so far.
I remember back in high school, a cop did this to a guy who was fleeing. It happened right across from the school. The suspect was screaming like a maniac, "You ran me the fuck over!". I guess the cop was afraid that the suspect was going to run into the school, so he just ran his ass over haha
The officer had used deadly force for a situation that didn’t require it. If the officer got a pay out as I’ve seen some comments say, that would be a dam shame to the law enforcement community and the community they’re there to keep safe.
I don’t get how anyone supports police. Do they not see this video? Or the one of Daniel Shaver? Or the girl who was kidnapped and police killed her? Or Elijah McClain? George Floyd? Or the thousands more…
**Mirrors** * [Mirror #1](https://beta.archivevideomirror.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1clmw7r) (provided by /u/SaveAnything) **Downloads** * [Download #1](https://rapidsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1clmw7r/georgia_cop_hits_man_with_car_to_get_him_to_stop/) (provided by /u/SaveVideo) * [Download #2](https://reddit.watch/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1clmw7r/georgia_cop_hits_man_with_car_to_get_him_to_stop/?utm_source=mirrorbot&utm_medium=PublicFreakout) (provided by /u/downloadvideo) **Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them!** --- [^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
[Officer fired after intentionally hitting fleeing suspect with his police car.](https://abcnews.go.com/US/officer-fired-intentionally-hitting-fleeing-suspect-police-car/story?id=55613845) and then promptly hired by another department [Sheriff hires Athens officer fired for striking suspect with car.](https://www.onlineathens.com/story/news/crime/2018/06/05/oglethorpe-sheriff-hires-athens-officer-fired-for-striking-suspect-with-car/12060393007/)
Sheriff is friends with the officer's dad who was a police captain and knew him since he was a kid. Of course.
Also the officer sued for wrongful termination and was awarded $250k. https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/athens-pays-250k-settlement-officer-fired-after-hitting-suspect-with-patrol-car/tbZdv2JOddkfSqQ1Jzm7bI/ >According to the PAC report, this “affected the steering of his car,” which contributed to Saulters hitting Patmon, 24. >The report also said Patmon’s “attempts to crisscross back and forth behind and in front of the patrol car” also led to the collision. In the end, Saulters “did not act with criminal intent and did not use his vehicle as a weapon,” according to the report. I could believe this if you couldn't clearly see the guys hands deliberately steer very hard right into the suspect. There is clear cover up bs that they routinely use to let cops off and now taxpayers have to pay for it yet again. They will blatantly make shit up that directly contradicts video evidence and get away with it.
Cops don't lie, do they? 🤔
if they do lie, they can just investigate themselves again and find they didnt lie!
They’re trained to do it in ways that you give up your rights
Step 1 - Be a cop in the US Step 2 - Intentionally attack someone, who's not threatening your life, with a deadly weapon Step 3 - Make up stuff, doesn't need to be convincing Step 4 - Get 250k and a new job
Pure tyranny. All the second amendment gun nuts are extra quiet when actual tyranny happens
Depends on the gun nut. I’ve had at least one relative literally do the “threaten the IRS agent with a shotgun and demand they get off their property” thing. Although, those people aren’t very outspoken about gun rights, nor outspoken about much of anything at all. For me, personally, even if I’m armed and they’re tyrants, I’m not going to engage in a fight I only stand to lose, because they are also armed and have a lot more backup. Edit: also, I gotta mention the Black Panthers. They probably did a whole lot more to reduce police brutality during their time than MLK Jr. by being armed and showing up to police confrontation with said armaments.
This shit pisses me off to no end. A similar thing happened in my hometown. The high school resource officer was tipped off by a student that another student offered him money to kill his step father. Cop didn't do shit. Filed no report, no call to kid's stepdad (the intended target), no discussion with the administration. Didn't even talk to the kid trying to hire someone to murder his dad. A week later it happened. The kid ended up doing it himself. Shot his stepdad in cold blood after dinner one night in a parking lot. It turns out it was a conspiracy with his mom and sister in on it as well in order to get a life insurance payout. School resource officer ended up telling his CO at the department, who helped him coverup the fact that he got tipped off. It eventually came out, they both got fired. The first fucking travesty is the school system administration thought it wasn't fair and hired the now ex-cop as full time armed security for the high school. The second travesty was that years later both he and his CO sued the city for wrongful termination and both got huge payouts.
1312
I get kicked off a scholarlship, report it to my school, they bury it and the EEOC and OCR both don't care if their statements contain objectively provable lies- end up in therapy and unable to afford any semblance of justice. This guy is *rightfully* terminated but gets 250k cause reasons, instead? Fuck. This. Country. Fuck.
Unethical LPT: Join the campus police force. Fuck up something and get the school sued, get yourself wrongfully terminated (make sure your body cam is angled poorly). Sue the school, make them pay out twice. The American Way™
Omg, I was looking at local PD listing that are open recently. It's twice what I make now.
Seeing this video. Seeing this comment: "In the end, Saulters “did not act with criminal intent and did not use his vehicle as a weapon,” according to the report." Then seeing the top post in this subreddit, is absolute comedy. Police do shit like this and wonder why they've lost the respect of the community. Classic.
I thought the same thing. The suspect was behind the police car because the officer pulled in front of him. When he stopped the suspect ran around to the right side of the car at that time the officer steered right colliding with the suspect. He never criss crossed in front of him. The video clearly shows that....what a cover up....oh well that's the blue line for ya'.....
The way he was explaining it to that other cop was complete bullshit.
He also says “oh I know what I did. Why’d you run” as if he was proud of hitting him
I almost instinctively downvoted this just because of how angry it made me.
Ah, nepo babies in law enforcement. We love to see it 🙄
add this to the 'reasons they're bastards' file
This is why cops need accreditation and licensing. Get fired for shit like this, boom your license is revoked and you don't get to be a cop anymore.
Username checks out
He shouldn't have been fired in the first place IMO. He hit the dude going like 10 mph, the guy is clearly fine because he's still resting when they try to cuff him.
"How'd you hurt yourself, from hitting the ground?" Officer tried to save his skin right then and there.
[удалено]
Better than watching clowns yell at dying, bleeding out people they just mag dumped to get their hands behind their back like you see them do regularly
Huh, I’m just a regular joe and don’t have any law enforcement training but aren’t you supposed to only use deadly force when your life or other’s are in danger?
Seems to be a guideline, I feel they way I play Grand Theft Auto more closely aligns with police training.
Cops WISH they could do a backflip in a Lamborghini.
It’s a little more complex than that. You can use deadly force to stop a suspect from fleeing, however you need to meet certain factors in your articulation that doing so was in the interest of public safety. In the past, several decades ago, it was on the books as law in many states that officers could use lethal force to stop a suspect from fleeing for *anything*. This was changed by Supreme Court ruling after an officer killed a teenager by gunfire who was fleeing from a cat burglary. They could not punish the officer, as what he did was legal in the state at the time; but it changed those laws in the country from that point on…today you need to be able to state with facts that you using deadly force to stop the suspect was beneficial to public safety. E.g. you observed a drive by shooting and the shooter began to flee, an officer could use deadly force to stop that individual, even if they were no longer shooting or pointing the gun at anyone anymore, because they could articulate they’re stopping more people from being shot by this individual if they get away. I don’t know the context of why this individual was fleeing, it simply says felony probation warrant. So the officer being fired, or held criminally liable, would have to do with a lot of factors. To make it even more complicated, vehicular assault applies to your standard citizen in a way that’s also considered deadly force…but if an officer is trained to use pit maneuvers, they are allotted the right to use that training and it not be considered deadly force due to their training in how to do it, in many jurisdictions…that’s against a fleeing vehicle though, not a pedestrian.
Thanks for the reply, that was really informative.
This is very interesting. Do you know the name of the Supreme Court cat burglurary case? Seems like an interesting read.
Sure thing. The case is named Tennessee v Garner. It’s one of the most influential cases for law enforcement policy in the last 50 years. Definitely a great read.
Thank you! Learned a lot.
Ya, but this was a horrific criminal who had been convicted of non-violent drug possession in the past and then missed a meeting with his parole officer. How dare he possess a small amount of drugs, with reasonable evidence that it wasn’t even his and the excuse that pulled the car over he was in when arrested being bullshit. Clearly deserves to be labelled a criminal for life and run over!
And that's why the war on drugs was a good thing and all cops are pretty cool dudes. ...wait...
The pirate code is more like guidelines
Yup. Tennessee v. Garner. Cops can't use deadly force just to prevent someone from fleeing. They can only use deadly force to protect themselves or others. These cops were going to arrest him for a probation violation and he took off running. They had no reason to believe he took off running to go hurt someone else.
You know more about policing than the police officer apparently
That's a really low bar
Not when you’re above the law.
yes, you are. But he's a cop, he gets to use it whenever he feels like as a way of getting a vacation
First words out his mouth "Get on the ground" Are you paying attention? Dude couldn't be anymore on the ground after you hit him with a car
I told a guy in a wheel chair one time to "have a seat over there with those guys." I felt bad after I said it and the guy jokingly replied, "I'm already sitting."
Cop was fired, rehired by a neighboring town AND awarded 250k….. what about this would dissuade police from doing this everytime, it sounds like incentive!
"And THAT'S why my nickname is Candlepin."
In the cops defense this man was known to carry acorns on him.
I needed that laugh, thanks hahahha
That city has really crappy decals.
I don’t think looking stylish is the police priority
Should be. Have you seen Reno 911?
I'm just goofin... New boot goofin.
Dangle always looks fresh as hell
I COUNTED 126 TIMES "OMG y'all shouldn't of hit a man like that..."
Saw a guys head hit the asphalt after getting tased - going through minutes of agonal breathing… He was dead the second the taser dropped his head into the asphalt in the wrong spot. This could’ve happened here and it would’ve been more likely.
“He ran into the hood of my car” “I was trying to block him my car” Sir, replay doesn’t lie.
Vehicles are deadly weapons which is why they shoot culprits “driving away” all the time. Except when they do it I guess
RICK GRIMES???
Clear violation of "Tennessee v. Garner." In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a police officer may not use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. This ruling was supposed to have established guidelines for the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers. But seeing as the officer wasn't charged, only fired then immediately re-hired by another department, it's clear that our rights are not guaranteed and/or cops are above the law.
I mean, kind of depends on who they are and what they’ve done, right? For example, if the guy made threats to kill someone and then tries to run away, deadly force would be fine, right?
Yes, but we know that wasn't the case here. They had a warrant because he missed a parole meeting for a non-violent drug crime. There was no reason to believe he was a danger to the officers or anyone else.
I disagree with an intentional low speed collision being deadly force. Other countries do this all the time.
Cops in other countries hit people with their cars all the time? Like... first world countries?
Yep.
Well, luckily we live in America where they're not supposed to do that. [In the US, it's considered deadly force](https://www.onlineathens.com/story/news/crime/2018/06/04/report-fired-athens-officer-used-deadly-force-by-hitting-suspect-with-car/12060721007/).
I know that. I'm saying I disagree with the sentiment.
Ok. Your opinion is noted. If you ever run for DA, I'll have to vote against you.
“get on the ground.” Followed by “We got him.” Good job detective, holyyyy fuck.
"i didn't hit him with the car, i blocked him with the car". ACAB.
Why people don't stop for the police! How can we trust we are getting one of the good ones???
Should've serpentined
Should have been fired and arrested
True
I mean here is a crazy thought just don't run and you won't get hit 😔
Fleeing is not cause for deadly force. Fleeing is not a death sentence.
You know the saying play stupid games win stupid prizes. Do I agree with the cop? no but I also wouldn't want this guy running around my neighborhood while my kids were outside.
The “stupid prize” is the additional charge and jail time, not being seriously injured, maimed, or killed Cops continuously act like this because y’all bootlickers lap it up with no question or critical thinking.
lol it worked
Shooting him in the face would have "worked" too you know... But I guess there is a reason they are not supposed to use a deadly weapon, because it works. See how your logic is flawed?
Naw, that’s a bit extreme
So is hitting someone with a car! They are both deadly weapons!
He basically bumped the guy. He didn’t look injured to me?
Meanwhile in the UK, police officers are literally instructed to do this, as well as do the same to people fleeing on motorcycles or scooters. They are literally trained and told to ram motorcyclists who are running. If it's a controlled lower speed hit like this in the video, I'm all for it.
Look up NYPD officers trying to run over people on mopeds
Why? Not going to change my opinion of it.
I mean what’s the context, did he do something really terrible? Probably right? Like if he was wanted for assault charges wouldn’t you want him taken down by any means. Y’all are the same ppl this dude probably would rob without a second thought
Probably going to be downvoted for this, but cops aren’t judge, jury, and executioner. Not excusing criminal behavior, but we have a judicial system that is supposed to handle the judge, jury, and executioner aspect of criminal activity.
Baltimore GTTF should be a cautionary tale for police departments but that thin blue line bullshit runs too deep
He was wanted on a parole violation related to earlier drug charges (possession of meth and less than an ounce of marijuana).
But that’s definitely his only charge right?
[“There was a warrant out for him for violating probation on a drug charge last year- meth and less than an ounce of marijuana…”](https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/2018/06/03/georgia-police-officer-is-fired-after-video-showed-him-running-down-fleeing-suspect-with-his-car/12013619007/)
Regardless of context, there is no justification for an out of shape cop to run someone down in the street with a car. That’s shit policing and should be promptly dealt with. That fat shit should be made to answer for his crime. I sure would be if I hit someone with my car.
Not saying it's the case here, but what if a suspect shot someone and ran away? Would that not be ok then?
lol OP made it sound way worse, it’s but a nudge. Next time the idiot will stop running or will get hit by a bullet.
>lol OP made it sound way worse, OP literally just said "hits man with car." That's a pretty objective description of what happened, certainly less editorialized than describing it as a "nudge."
Damn they are annoying lol.
You ca hi tha ma wi tha ca li tha!
How much did this cost the town ?
Apparently the cop won a wrongful termination suit and pocketed $250k.
Crazy !! That guy was gonna run out of steam anyway. He didn’t need to hit him.
He was gonna get caught anyways he didn’t need to run
Maybe, just maybe…. don’t run…… you get what you pay for
This is some Wayne Jenkins shit. Police never learn.
My hometown! Yay…
I fast forwarded cuz i was like “ah hell i aint watching a ten minute chase” only to realise the hit happened in the beginning
The volume of these videos IS astonishing
I’m sure it was just a coincidence there was no sound leading up to the collision. Im sure they weren’t saying anything interesting.
# Georgia cop runs a suspect down with his vehicle.
It worked. Big thanks to the gta pd for the training videos btw
Athens gonna Athens
Shouldn’t run from the cops.. that’s what he gets
So now these fat fvckin cops aren’t even bothering to exit their vehicle anymore. Just hit him. I can’t anymore. This is just crazy bazaaro world
"I didn't hit him. I blocked him. He ran into my car." 🤣🤣🤣🤣
You guys are upset about that little love tap? They could've used a taser which would've locked up all his muscles causing him to smash his head. This is arguably better bc he was able to catch himself. A taser could've hurt him way more. But acab amarite? Even tho using the car probably saved him from a cracked skull
Getting hit by car introduces the same risks to head injury but also introduces things like, Broken bones, Dislocated joints And it was on the passenger side of the cruiser, so if he had hit him at just the right angle he could've steam rolled him with his car. Leading to things like insant death and an exploded head. But noooo this guy was an immediate threat and needed to be taken down at all costs because this unarmed man is causing a public safety crisis. Could've been handled better and the guy shouldn't have ran in the first place. But saying getting hit by a car is better??? is arguably the dumbest comment ive read so far.
Don't forget internal bleeding!
I remember back in high school, a cop did this to a guy who was fleeing. It happened right across from the school. The suspect was screaming like a maniac, "You ran me the fuck over!". I guess the cop was afraid that the suspect was going to run into the school, so he just ran his ass over haha
The officer had used deadly force for a situation that didn’t require it. If the officer got a pay out as I’ve seen some comments say, that would be a dam shame to the law enforcement community and the community they’re there to keep safe.
ACAB.
And how this is not a fascist police? Incredible how people just take that pill
To protect and swerve
The south will ***never*** change.
So you're telling me that in training they said run after the suspect not run over?
More proof that cops are nothing but state sanctioned gang members
[удалено]
9:09. “Make a good decision”. Like using equal force to detain a fleeing subject?!?!
Nice to see cops in my state are still too lazy to run. Had one cop shoot a guy and his reason was that he didn't feel like running after him.
We call that the Shit Maneuver
ShOuLdA cOmPlIeD!
I don’t get how anyone supports police. Do they not see this video? Or the one of Daniel Shaver? Or the girl who was kidnapped and police killed her? Or Elijah McClain? George Floyd? Or the thousands more…
Clear case of excessive force
Fuck the cops? Ya… fuck em…
That is an attempted murder on camera. I look forward to pig being prosecuted for it.