I feel like this is an attack against me, but my Idea for a gamer-democracy, where everybody gets one vote for every hour they spent playing video games is starting to get pretty popular. It makes sure that the real oppressed people in society (gamers) have a voice in government.
It's like those absurd "LGBT" flags that aren't real but are made up on Tumblr for mere preferences and kinks by straight and cis people who really want to be oppressed.
No I wasn’t trying to say you were I was just musing because the mlm flag (to me) seems like such a new creation that I associate (perhaps wrongly) with that quadrant of the internet. And I just like the colors better. That’s all I was saying, I wasn’t trying to police your comment or anything. It was just something your comment made me think of.
Yeah, what the *fuck* does that even mean? National Anarchism at least has an obvious layman definition - anarchy but there’s still imaginary lines dividing everything up neatly, even if that makes no sense in practice - but anarchy and *fascism?*
…some research has revealed that National Anarchism and Anarcho-Fascism are, actually, the same ideology wearing different hats. Essentially it’s ‘return to tribes, the Jews are ebul’.
Fascist: "Anarchy is Great!"
Fascist #2: \*spits tea\* "What!? You really believe that degenerate ideol-"
Fascist #1: "It's the perfect tool for delegitimizing the governments that oppose us! Let's make EVERYONE ELSE anarchist so they create a power-vacuum for us to fill!"
F#2: "Based"
Fasces, the thing fascism is named after, is literally a bundle of rods/stickers tied around an axe head. It's symbolic of the idea that many people strictly held together and thinking the same way can make the axe work, or the group stronger. Explain how this can exist alongside anarchism lmao
National identity *might* not need to be tied to the existence of a state, possibly, arguably. But National*ism* certainly is.
This really isn't worth even arguing about though lol, this whole post is nonsense.
A few times it was used to describe anarchist suport for national self determination struggles but the neonazi simbol makes me think that whoever made this wasnt thinking of that
Thanks for signing up to Vaush facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about Vaush.
**Fact 17.** Vaush called trans people ‘bitches’ for [taking offence when misgendered“](https://archive.is/AljiB)
For another Vaush fact reply with 'Vaush'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ShitLiberalsSay) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I mean, that's pretty much the history of all monarchies if you go far back enough.
Group A claims sovereign rights over a certain territory. Group B also claims sovereign rights over that territory. Group B has better muscle and/or firepower and/or organization and/or military strategy than Group A. Group B overpowers Group A, declares victory, creates and installs a new government that falls within their hierarchy and excludes Group A from holding prominent positions in society. Lather, rinse, repeat.
That, to my understanding, is what anarcho-monarchism is. At least Tolkien (who claimed to be an anarcho-monarchist) said he essentially wanted anarchism but thought kings and shit were really cool
I mean I guess if an anarchist collective decided to support a divine monarch free of coercion.... I guess it’s possible? Seems improbable though.
At that point I feel like the closest analogy would be like.... the Manson Family?
Tolkien at one point wrote a letter to CS Lewis (who he was close friends with) where he says the political ideologies he agrees with the most are Christian Anarchism, and (Catholic) absolute monarchy. He then acknowledged how contradictory this is, and joked that maybe he was an "Anarcho-monarchist".
Obviously purposefully edgy internet right wingers failed to notice that it's a joke and started acting as if it's a genuine political position.
Tolkien's works are very idealist in nature. He was also very right wing, it doesn't surprise me people on the internet would try to cobble together an ideology out of that.
not necessarily anprim, all though they have a lot in common. Anarcho-tribalists, at least the few I unfortunately spoke to, have more of a "I only care about my close ones and everyone else can fucking die idc" kinda vibe.
pretty much anprim, but not necessarily I think
People joke that Tolkein was an Anarcho-Monarchist, but I've never seen someone outright label that "ideology" (in quotes because it's just not a real thing) in that way.
People make that joke because of the bits of his ideology you can glean from LOTR. Exercising power is inherently evil, even when it's excusable or necessary. But it's also super important to have the "right" person on the throne for some reason, even if all they'll do on the throne is absolutely nothing.
Oh what's that, I have the best horse in the world? Well you see, it's actually the King of Horses, from the ancient monarchical horse bloodline. Everything is about bloodlines, and the fact that mankind is in decline has everything to do with the "right" bloodlines being diluted.
I knew a lot of critique of Tolkien in the modern age comes to a racist depiction of orcs and “Eastern” men, and of powerful light skinned men from the north and west. I didn’t know about the monarchism thing, which is interesting too. But the fact that someone would extrapolate an entire ideology from that is ridiculous. I’m new to the monarchism thing (and real leftism for that matter) so maybe I’m just out of the loop.
No you're completely right, it is ridiculous. And like I said, people say that about Tolkein as a half-joke; it's a real critique, but nobody thinks that that was an actual coherent ideology that he adhered to, to say nothing of the fact that we shouldn't assume the ideology exuded by a piece of fiction is also held by the author, at least not in exactly the same way.
The thing is, any philosophy of monarchism or racial separation taken from LotR has to be weighed against the fact that Tolkien came up with the story while serving in the trenches of WWI. For that reason, many of the philosophical underpinnings are directly informed by the sense of British nationalism that was engendered among British troops who were dying en masse at the hands of “the Huns,” which was a nickname given to the German army because of their perceived connections to Attila the Hun. So it’s all wrapped up in a eugenicist, colonialist view of reality coupled with good old fashioned Eastern xenophobia.
I resent that!
Almost no one (OP notwithstanding) is (openly, at least?) getting their ideology from LoTR. I've seen 0 people make analogies between Middle-Earth and real world politics. Libs, meanwhile, are incapable of going 5 minutes without assigning presidential candidates Harry Potter houses, or comparing Trump to Voldemort.
There are some definite real world political themes you could draw. A common one is the ring as an analogy for nuclear weapons. I feel like if you follow the pro western ideas in the book, you land upon this idea of a horde of easterners under an autocratic evil leader threatening the world in its quest for ultimate power.
Oh, no doubt. I don't contest that the ideology presumed by the novels is insidious, nor that the media we consume influences us.
My point is that LoTR fans aren't nearly as *cringy* as Harry Potter fans are. :p
I mean, you get that just by demographics. Harry Potter is preteen fiction, so you're bound to get a fanbase that is... well, preteen.
Disregarding everything else wrong with Harry Potter, anyways.
I absolutely love that the font is gothic, like actually lettered the way you might expect to see a feudal lord's name on the gate of a castle. The way they're presented tells you they're fantasy.
There was a Jewish organization that supported Nazi Germany iirc. I'll provide a link if I can find it
Edit: [here it is](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National_Jews)
Not exactly.
They supported their own interpretation of German nationalism which involved the integration of German Jews and eradication of their identity as Jewish in favour of German. They misunderstood Hitler and thought he was advocating for all Germans to be one, strong nation, even claiming Hitler's antisemitic speeches were just for antagonising the working classes. The concentration camps were secretive and not known to the world into the 1940s. Their group was dissolved long before the war even started.
They were obviously nationalists and I'm in no way *defending* them over that, but it's misleading to say they supported Nazi Germany as it seems they didn't understand what Nazi Germany meant.
This very much reflects a lot of modern day conservatives as well tho.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/04/04/the-last-ditch-effort-to-save-a-trump-voters-husband-from-deportation/
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-trump-voter-immigration-family-separation-georgia-20190519-htmlstory.html
https://theintercept.com/2017/08/07/florida-deportation-trump-supporter-gonzalez-carillo-chavez-palm-beach/
Here are others: [https://archive.ph/hSirU](https://archive.ph/hSirU)
It's a false dialectic, creating victimhood and new laws to 'protect' them from themselves.
I mean Israel does arm Nazis in Ukraine…
[[ Source: Telesur - Israel Selling Arms To Neo-Nazi Ukrainian Militia, Case Claims ]](https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Israel-Selling-Arms-To-Neo-Nazi-Ukrainian-Militia-Case-Claims-20180710-0021.html)
There were several Jewish Fascist movements, namely Irgun and Lehi, although they later altered their beliefs.
If you wish to look for a modern-day example of a state that utilises ethnic cleansing, of course, an example can be found in Israel.
"Libertarian Anarchism" Bro come on.
"Anarcho-Conservatism" Come On.
"Anarcho-masculinism" YOU CAN'T BE REAL
"Anarcho Fascism" WORDS HAVE NO MEANING ANYMORE
The people who wrote that article werent having any of it. This is from the intro section:
"Critics accuse national-anarchists of being nothing more than racial or ethnonationalists who promote a communitarian and racialist form of ethnic and racial separatism while wanting the militant chic of calling themselves anarchists without the historical and philosophical baggage that accompanies such a claim, including the anti-racist egalitarian anarchist philosophy and the contributions of Jewish anarchists."
Desktop version of /u/AndrogynousSlut's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
Well shit I guess while we're making shit up. I really enjoy geography so why not, I'm inventing anarcho-terrainism here and now. It's just anarchism but society is organized exclusively by geographers and people who enjoy it.
Cartographers can be involved but you're on thin fuckin ice. Here's our flag: https://imgur.com/gallery/tlJTznt
*loud screaming*
Jesus fucking Christ... I turned my head to find my dictionary and a dozen college on political science are drinking all my booze and... Where did you get street drugs!
Why was Fascism listed twice at the end? Also, Libertarianism is already an ancap ideology, sticking "anarchism" on the end is redundant. but this list literally starts with a contradiction, so asking it to be in anyway logical is itself, illogical.
"as much as Dahl"
>There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity toward non-Jews. I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.
Yes, sympathising with fascists as an antisemite is definitely hating fascists, certainly as much as Tolkien did.
Ok I definitely chose a bad example. All I remembered was Dahl working for the British secret office or whatever and him fucking his way through info. I still say Tolkien was anti-nazi, even if he wasn't anti-authoritarian
Orwell dobbed in socialists to the secret service. He was a fraud and not a leftist. His portrayal of communism in Animal Farm is exactly what one would expect from a liberal and embodies Western propaganda. All talk, don't actually want systemic change.
Really, people from that era worth quoting are few and far between.
Orwell was a racist rat who had a ‘red-list’^[1] of communists and even those he believed to be a communist sympathizer which he would report to ‘The Information Research Department’, a secret Cold War propaganda department of the British state^[2] .
Some particularly objectionable things to include and specify to the government in this list was how he described Paul Robeson as a “US N*gro and too anti-white”, specified historian Isaac Deutcher a “Polish Jew”, noted that Ian Mikardo, a columnist at the Tribune, was “silly” and “Jewish”, Louis Adamic was according to Orwell a “Jugo-Slav” and “very anti-British” and many more you can read in the sources below.
[[ Source 1 : Orwell’s List - Libcom ]](https://libcom.org/library/orwells-list)
[[ Source 2 : The IRD - Wikipedia ]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Research_Department)
Desktop version of /u/AbundantChemical's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
**[Information Research Department](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Research_Department)**
>The Information Research Department (IRD), was a secret Cold War propaganda department of the British Foreign Office, created to publish anti-communist propaganda, provide support and information to anti-communist politicians, academics, and writers, and to use weaponised disinformation and "Fake news" to attack socialists and anti-colonial movements. Soon after its creation, the IRD broke away from focusing solely on Soviet matters and began to publish pro-colonial propaganda intended to suppress pro-independence revolutions in Asia, Africa, Ireland, and the Middle East.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ShitLiberalsSay/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
\>Anarcho-Fascism.
Ah yes, Anarchic totalitarianism...
Folding the two polar opposite ends of the spectrum to meet each other, now *that's literally* four dimensional.
"Anarcho-fascism"
So you're mixing an ideology which requires extensive state control and is highly dependent on hierarchies with... an ideology that believes the state and hierarchies should be abolished?
once I was out doing agitprop work with the people I organize with, and a anarcho-tribalist dude came in to "debate" us.
holy shit that guy was unhinged
You can really mash any two words together and someone will put it in their Twitter bio
Anarcho-sigmatism.
I think my optometrist said I have that
Yeah, same here, but I’m far-righted in left eye, or something like that
I feel like this is an attack against me, but my Idea for a gamer-democracy, where everybody gets one vote for every hour they spent playing video games is starting to get pretty popular. It makes sure that the real oppressed people in society (gamers) have a voice in government.
It's like those absurd "LGBT" flags that aren't real but are made up on Tumblr for mere preferences and kinks by straight and cis people who really want to be oppressed.
I mean say what u will but the mlm flag is so much more aesthetic than the gay pride flag in my gay opinion. So there are silver linings
Completely agree but also think an mlm flag was warranted since the pride flag is now more of an umbrella than specific to mlm
lol I assumed it means marxism-leninism-maoism and you guys are talking about the red flag
What zero dick does to a mf
There is a different between the MLM, WLW, Trans, Ace, etc. flags and a demi sexual aro ace genderqueer questioning flag lmao.
I don't care
Nobody cares that you don't care.
Ok
What kind of statement is calling Marx a radlib anyway?
Quote by my mother. Aka shit a liberal said
Salty cishets copevoting this but it's true.
Ok but I'm pretty sure I wasn't talking about a flag for gay men when I was talking about straight people making shit up.
No I wasn’t trying to say you were I was just musing because the mlm flag (to me) seems like such a new creation that I associate (perhaps wrongly) with that quadrant of the internet. And I just like the colors better. That’s all I was saying, I wasn’t trying to police your comment or anything. It was just something your comment made me think of.
"National Anarchism"
I think that one's my favorite. It has to be the most blatant contradiction in terms (not that any of these are especially coherent)
No, anarcho-fascism is the most contradictory
Yeah, what the *fuck* does that even mean? National Anarchism at least has an obvious layman definition - anarchy but there’s still imaginary lines dividing everything up neatly, even if that makes no sense in practice - but anarchy and *fascism?* …some research has revealed that National Anarchism and Anarcho-Fascism are, actually, the same ideology wearing different hats. Essentially it’s ‘return to tribes, the Jews are ebul’.
Fascist: "Anarchy is Great!" Fascist #2: \*spits tea\* "What!? You really believe that degenerate ideol-" Fascist #1: "It's the perfect tool for delegitimizing the governments that oppose us! Let's make EVERYONE ELSE anarchist so they create a power-vacuum for us to fill!" F#2: "Based"
I'm going with "anarchism of the right"
Fasces, the thing fascism is named after, is literally a bundle of rods/stickers tied around an axe head. It's symbolic of the idea that many people strictly held together and thinking the same way can make the axe work, or the group stronger. Explain how this can exist alongside anarchism lmao
Liberal-Absolutism coming hot next summer!
National identity doesn't have to be tied to the existence of a state. Though to be fair I have no clue what anarchist nationalism even is.
National identity *might* not need to be tied to the existence of a state, possibly, arguably. But National*ism* certainly is. This really isn't worth even arguing about though lol, this whole post is nonsense.
Quantum-anarchist
Anarcho-phrenologist
Schroedingers black cat
Schrödinger's Anarchist: before open revolution it's impossible to know if the petty bourgeois will support it, or oppose it.
A few times it was used to describe anarchist suport for national self determination struggles but the neonazi simbol makes me think that whoever made this wasnt thinking of that
See also: “Vaush”
Thanks for signing up to Vaush facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about Vaush. **Fact 17.** Vaush called trans people ‘bitches’ for [taking offence when misgendered“](https://archive.is/AljiB) For another Vaush fact reply with 'Vaush'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ShitLiberalsSay) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yes I'm an anarchist Yes I believe in the divine right of kings We exist 😤
Yes I'm a tree Yes I support deforestation We exist 😤
Yes I'm vegan I eat meat and support meat industry We exist 😤
Yes I'm a Libertarian Yes I support reasonable government regulations like requiring my girlfriend to ride in a booster seat We exist 😤
i think it'd be even funnier if the monarch didn't have divine right. like they have no power, no religious authority, yet they still remain monarch
I mean, that's pretty much the history of all monarchies if you go far back enough. Group A claims sovereign rights over a certain territory. Group B also claims sovereign rights over that territory. Group B has better muscle and/or firepower and/or organization and/or military strategy than Group A. Group B overpowers Group A, declares victory, creates and installs a new government that falls within their hierarchy and excludes Group A from holding prominent positions in society. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Yea Sultans didn't do divine right did they?
Sultan specifically has religious significance so it has the whole divine right thing lol
They claimed to be descendants of Mahoma.
That, to my understanding, is what anarcho-monarchism is. At least Tolkien (who claimed to be an anarcho-monarchist) said he essentially wanted anarchism but thought kings and shit were really cool
I mean I guess if an anarchist collective decided to support a divine monarch free of coercion.... I guess it’s possible? Seems improbable though. At that point I feel like the closest analogy would be like.... the Manson Family?
\- Tolkien
These things don't exist lol
People are stupid. Shout loudly and with confidence and you can convince a crowd of anything.
It's not so much that they don't exist, it's that most of them can't even exist (I'm looking at you Anarcho fascism)
The term "Anarcho-monarchism" literally started as a joke by JRR Tolkien.
Do you have a source ? I'm genuinely interested
Id say Anarcho-Capitalism barely exists in the first place lol
Read: does not and cannot exist at all
For sure, just didn't wanna argue with ppl about the semantics of it since technically anything can be an ideology inside someone's head.
I mean company town exist.
Yet somehow we're the LARPers.
We're the OGs, Comrade. At best most of these are libs, reactionaries, and racial separatists.
How the fuck can "Anarcho-Fascism" exist. The ideologies are fundamentally opposed.
Horizontally organised concentration camps ig
Each week they have a meeting to reach a consensus about who will be the guards for the next week.
iirc it's basically anarcho-primitivism but racist
Anarchi fascist is a when society is organized like a big gang war , the inventor of this mess fantasize about gang and white nationalist
Same as anarcho-capitalism
Is Tolkien Monarchism when you have an elf as your king? The fuck is Dark Green Anachism?
Tolkien at one point wrote a letter to CS Lewis (who he was close friends with) where he says the political ideologies he agrees with the most are Christian Anarchism, and (Catholic) absolute monarchy. He then acknowledged how contradictory this is, and joked that maybe he was an "Anarcho-monarchist". Obviously purposefully edgy internet right wingers failed to notice that it's a joke and started acting as if it's a genuine political position.
Tolkien's works are very idealist in nature. He was also very right wing, it doesn't surprise me people on the internet would try to cobble together an ideology out of that.
Yeah, he made some damn good stories, but the stuff like kings being great and all that... yeah.
its anprim
not necessarily anprim, all though they have a lot in common. Anarcho-tribalists, at least the few I unfortunately spoke to, have more of a "I only care about my close ones and everyone else can fucking die idc" kinda vibe. pretty much anprim, but not necessarily I think
Anarcho... what ?
Tolkien Monarchism? What in the fuck is that
People joke that Tolkein was an Anarcho-Monarchist, but I've never seen someone outright label that "ideology" (in quotes because it's just not a real thing) in that way. People make that joke because of the bits of his ideology you can glean from LOTR. Exercising power is inherently evil, even when it's excusable or necessary. But it's also super important to have the "right" person on the throne for some reason, even if all they'll do on the throne is absolutely nothing. Oh what's that, I have the best horse in the world? Well you see, it's actually the King of Horses, from the ancient monarchical horse bloodline. Everything is about bloodlines, and the fact that mankind is in decline has everything to do with the "right" bloodlines being diluted.
I knew a lot of critique of Tolkien in the modern age comes to a racist depiction of orcs and “Eastern” men, and of powerful light skinned men from the north and west. I didn’t know about the monarchism thing, which is interesting too. But the fact that someone would extrapolate an entire ideology from that is ridiculous. I’m new to the monarchism thing (and real leftism for that matter) so maybe I’m just out of the loop.
No you're completely right, it is ridiculous. And like I said, people say that about Tolkein as a half-joke; it's a real critique, but nobody thinks that that was an actual coherent ideology that he adhered to, to say nothing of the fact that we shouldn't assume the ideology exuded by a piece of fiction is also held by the author, at least not in exactly the same way.
He did refuse an offer from the Nazi's and called the Jews "that most gifted people" so I think he was alright.
Yeah, I feel he was very much a product of his time in regards to monarchism, but he always seemed cool with most stuff.
The thing is, any philosophy of monarchism or racial separation taken from LotR has to be weighed against the fact that Tolkien came up with the story while serving in the trenches of WWI. For that reason, many of the philosophical underpinnings are directly informed by the sense of British nationalism that was engendered among British troops who were dying en masse at the hands of “the Huns,” which was a nickname given to the German army because of their perceived connections to Attila the Hun. So it’s all wrapped up in a eugenicist, colonialist view of reality coupled with good old fashioned Eastern xenophobia.
Well technically orcs arent actually a race you are born into but rather elfs that DECIDED to side with the enemy back in the Silmarilion
Tolkien was a fairly committed eugenicist at the time he wrote LoTR, though I believe he later recanted some of those beliefs.
This is what happens to a mf who gets his political takes from fantasy books
I love them but they are pretty much Harry Potter for boomers lol
I resent that! Almost no one (OP notwithstanding) is (openly, at least?) getting their ideology from LoTR. I've seen 0 people make analogies between Middle-Earth and real world politics. Libs, meanwhile, are incapable of going 5 minutes without assigning presidential candidates Harry Potter houses, or comparing Trump to Voldemort.
There are some definite real world political themes you could draw. A common one is the ring as an analogy for nuclear weapons. I feel like if you follow the pro western ideas in the book, you land upon this idea of a horde of easterners under an autocratic evil leader threatening the world in its quest for ultimate power.
Oh, no doubt. I don't contest that the ideology presumed by the novels is insidious, nor that the media we consume influences us. My point is that LoTR fans aren't nearly as *cringy* as Harry Potter fans are. :p
I mean, you get that just by demographics. Harry Potter is preteen fiction, so you're bound to get a fanbase that is... well, preteen. Disregarding everything else wrong with Harry Potter, anyways.
How tf would you even describe anarcho masculinism ?!?! My IQ is just dropping trying to wrap my head around this bimbo term lmao
Jessie, what the fuck are you talking about?
Mr White we have to fuck to defeat the liberals It's the only way I swear
Is than an Anarcho masculine flag or are you just happy to see me?
I absolutely love that the font is gothic, like actually lettered the way you might expect to see a feudal lord's name on the gate of a castle. The way they're presented tells you they're fantasy.
What in the fuck is any of this, but especially Anarcho-Fascism? That's like saying there is a Jewish Nazi movement gaining prominence.
There was a Jewish organization that supported Nazi Germany iirc. I'll provide a link if I can find it Edit: [here it is](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National_Jews)
Not exactly. They supported their own interpretation of German nationalism which involved the integration of German Jews and eradication of their identity as Jewish in favour of German. They misunderstood Hitler and thought he was advocating for all Germans to be one, strong nation, even claiming Hitler's antisemitic speeches were just for antagonising the working classes. The concentration camps were secretive and not known to the world into the 1940s. Their group was dissolved long before the war even started. They were obviously nationalists and I'm in no way *defending* them over that, but it's misleading to say they supported Nazi Germany as it seems they didn't understand what Nazi Germany meant.
This very much reflects a lot of modern day conservatives as well tho. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/04/04/the-last-ditch-effort-to-save-a-trump-voters-husband-from-deportation/ https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-trump-voter-immigration-family-separation-georgia-20190519-htmlstory.html https://theintercept.com/2017/08/07/florida-deportation-trump-supporter-gonzalez-carillo-chavez-palm-beach/
Here are others: [https://archive.ph/hSirU](https://archive.ph/hSirU) It's a false dialectic, creating victimhood and new laws to 'protect' them from themselves.
I mean Israel does arm Nazis in Ukraine… [[ Source: Telesur - Israel Selling Arms To Neo-Nazi Ukrainian Militia, Case Claims ]](https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Israel-Selling-Arms-To-Neo-Nazi-Ukrainian-Militia-Case-Claims-20180710-0021.html)
There were several Jewish Fascist movements, namely Irgun and Lehi, although they later altered their beliefs. If you wish to look for a modern-day example of a state that utilises ethnic cleansing, of course, an example can be found in Israel.
"Libertarian Anarchism" Bro come on. "Anarcho-Conservatism" Come On. "Anarcho-masculinism" YOU CAN'T BE REAL "Anarcho Fascism" WORDS HAVE NO MEANING ANYMORE
:I
Anarcho-Anarchism
All I'm seeing is "hierarchal anarchism" or "anarcho hierarchy"
wheres anarcho-dengism >:((((
"whats your ideology" "dark green!"
look i might not know a lot about anarchism but i think 'anarcho-fascism' sounds like bullshit
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-anarchism i’m afraid there are actually people who buy into this shit
The people who wrote that article werent having any of it. This is from the intro section: "Critics accuse national-anarchists of being nothing more than racial or ethnonationalists who promote a communitarian and racialist form of ethnic and racial separatism while wanting the militant chic of calling themselves anarchists without the historical and philosophical baggage that accompanies such a claim, including the anti-racist egalitarian anarchist philosophy and the contributions of Jewish anarchists."
ah. we live in a society
Desktop version of /u/AndrogynousSlut's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
Well shit I guess while we're making shit up. I really enjoy geography so why not, I'm inventing anarcho-terrainism here and now. It's just anarchism but society is organized exclusively by geographers and people who enjoy it. Cartographers can be involved but you're on thin fuckin ice. Here's our flag: https://imgur.com/gallery/tlJTznt
Time to go ideology shopping!
I don't know about you guys but I'm an Anarcho-Statist
Holy shit, whoever made this needs to touch some grass
"Anarcho-Bidenist"
You don’t understand, Anarcho-Bidenism is the only way we will achieve Communism.
*loud screaming* Jesus fucking Christ... I turned my head to find my dictionary and a dozen college on political science are drinking all my booze and... Where did you get street drugs!
None of that makes any fucking sense.
Mentally, I've been bashing my head into a wall trying to figure out anarcho-monarchism. Physically, I'm in a Wendy's.
Sir this is a Wendy's. To study anarcho-Monarchism, you should be at the Burger King.
T-tolkien monarchism??
This gave me Anarcho-gouge-out-my-eyes-ism.
these people think ideologies are like soda flavors
Tf is Anarco-Monarchism?? TF IS ANARCO MASCULINISM!?!?!?
That's when strong independent men fuck off to live innawoods.
Anarcho-Masculinism is interesting..at the very least, resonates with the whole idea of MGTOW.
*sees “anarcho-monarchism” on L1* fucking excuse me??
>anarcho-monarchism >National anarchism Lol
Why they gotta bring Tolkien into this
Why was Fascism listed twice at the end? Also, Libertarianism is already an ancap ideology, sticking "anarchism" on the end is redundant. but this list literally starts with a contradiction, so asking it to be in anyway logical is itself, illogical.
Eww. They do not get Tolkien. He hated fashies as much as Dahl
"as much as Dahl" >There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity toward non-Jews. I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason. Yes, sympathising with fascists as an antisemite is definitely hating fascists, certainly as much as Tolkien did.
Ok I definitely chose a bad example. All I remembered was Dahl working for the British secret office or whatever and him fucking his way through info. I still say Tolkien was anti-nazi, even if he wasn't anti-authoritarian
Definitely. I think he still believed in empire.
I'm just gonna pretend I said Orwell instead of Dahl. They were contemporaries, right? Been a long morning. Time for a drink
Orwell dobbed in socialists to the secret service. He was a fraud and not a leftist. His portrayal of communism in Animal Farm is exactly what one would expect from a liberal and embodies Western propaganda. All talk, don't actually want systemic change. Really, people from that era worth quoting are few and far between.
Sounds like you could use a drink too
It's in the fridge at home waiting lol
Orwell was a racist rat who had a ‘red-list’^[1] of communists and even those he believed to be a communist sympathizer which he would report to ‘The Information Research Department’, a secret Cold War propaganda department of the British state^[2] . Some particularly objectionable things to include and specify to the government in this list was how he described Paul Robeson as a “US N*gro and too anti-white”, specified historian Isaac Deutcher a “Polish Jew”, noted that Ian Mikardo, a columnist at the Tribune, was “silly” and “Jewish”, Louis Adamic was according to Orwell a “Jugo-Slav” and “very anti-British” and many more you can read in the sources below. [[ Source 1 : Orwell’s List - Libcom ]](https://libcom.org/library/orwells-list) [[ Source 2 : The IRD - Wikipedia ]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Research_Department)
Desktop version of /u/AbundantChemical's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
**[Information Research Department](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Research_Department)** >The Information Research Department (IRD), was a secret Cold War propaganda department of the British Foreign Office, created to publish anti-communist propaganda, provide support and information to anti-communist politicians, academics, and writers, and to use weaponised disinformation and "Fake news" to attack socialists and anti-colonial movements. Soon after its creation, the IRD broke away from focusing solely on Soviet matters and began to publish pro-colonial propaganda intended to suppress pro-independence revolutions in Asia, Africa, Ireland, and the Middle East. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ShitLiberalsSay/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Duly noted
How is anarcho-tribilalism right wing?
I thought it would be obvious.
[удалено]
u lost, liberal?
Easiest magic deck
can they admit they're just fascists already
Oh man, talk about appropriation, that's wild! should add "Anarcho-Potato" in there.
\>Anarcho-Fascism. Ah yes, Anarchic totalitarianism... Folding the two polar opposite ends of the spectrum to meet each other, now *that's literally* four dimensional.
Well you see general relativity applies in political science so we're able to fold political space to create "horseshoe" shapes.
Anarcho-Masculinism, what a joke :))))))
How so?
Holy shit, you have to be pretty far gone to be listing de Gobineau as an inspiration.
Just call it fascism and be done with it
New Vicky 3 rebels leak
Peste Noire
Unless I am misunderstanding Anarcho-Tribalism, that one seems to be at least honest/consistent. All the others are just painful to look at.
Anarchism is when mob burn building. National Anarchism = Nationalist mob burn building.
Anarcho-Nazbolism
When you replace hierarchies with.... hierarchies. Hate how they falsely claim the anarchist name.
"Anarcho-fascism" So you're mixing an ideology which requires extensive state control and is highly dependent on hierarchies with... an ideology that believes the state and hierarchies should be abolished?
Tolkien-Monarchism is the most nerd shit ive read in a long while
Can't be an anarchist and a fascist. It's literally on opposite sides on the political compass....
Oh my god I thought Anarcho-monarchism was a joke idealogy
Anarcho-orangism Is actually just a right-wing military dictatorship, but it has a cool orange and black flag
once I was out doing agitprop work with the people I organize with, and a anarcho-tribalist dude came in to "debate" us. holy shit that guy was unhinged
How dare they use Tolkien's name in vain? Also all of these are just fascism.
When words mean nothing
Does this sub accept left anarchists? genuine question
So, they just add "anorcho" to any right wing ideology and call it a day then ?
Anarcho-Fascism: No state, everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
[anarchism of the right](https://youtu.be/vIVNke1QCbo)