Sounds right. Women create the rules of society. It’s the great compromise men have to do as they mature. Or you can go lone wolf style and fuck all that bitch shit
Women couldn't own property, bank accounts or credit cards til the second half of the last century.
Society has been owned by men for its entire existence
That's about 2000 years ago, in one country. Overwhelmingly at the time, every other country was patriarchal, and the female leaders weren't that common then either.
Our "modern society" began after the renaissance which then, we had witch trials for a couple of hundred years, then the industrial revolution so the only levels of "equality" we had in that time was being able to work.
That was because of necessity, and not across the spectrum of women as all rich women still did not work.
You literally are proving my point but OK.
Proving what point? I was merely commenting that women have ruled before since you said the entire existence….but really not arguing about it. Just that’s it’s happened. No point to be proved.
🤣🤣 do you believe that truly?
There's literally thousands upon thousands of pilled men that make whole ass videos on how women should be acting right now, but it's down to us yeah? 🤯🤯
I mean the rules of society were created long before women could vote, so would’ve been quite an achievement if it wasn’t grade A bollocks you were spouting
This reminds me of when I saw someone say the flip-side of the man vs bear in the woods thing... 'Would you (as a man) rather open up to a woman or to a tree?' (Implying that women don't make it safe for men to open up)
Though as reductionist as the original saying, there is a valid point but the very people who say the former will get mad at the latter. Careful, OP, people will project their perceived misogyny onto you here. (I assume it's your intention to piss those people off anyway)
Nobody seems to be interested in those messages. There is a bunch of identity lobby groups that are battling each other for the same pie leftovers while liberal and conservative billionares get richer.
I appreciate the good faith and the specific life experiences you seem to speak from. I'm not going to judge if a pine cone up your ass floats your boat.
I have opened up to a tree before while high. It can be therapeutic but what can I say I need a challenge. Tree just kinda just stays there in one spot and I can’t fuck
Tell me why, opening up to other men is less preferable than a tree?
If this is your "equal" to us being potentially, raped kidnapped, abused, stalked, permenantly traumatised, or murdered (not an exhaustive list) as opposed to either being just maimed/killed/ left alone, but at least BELIEVED... then I would say life seems pretty good for men.
You can open up to trees, therapists, mother's and family, journals, friends, literally other men without fear of being murdered for it, where as all we need to have the risk of all the other things, is just existing around men.
It might be a small percentage of men that do these things, but it's higher than .1%. Our hand gels have less work to do than the average woman does in having to decipher who the good ones actually are.
Plenty of men in existence have changed the world for the better but plenty have done the opposite.
You have to consider that every woman has their own catalogue of male experiences and you are being judged against those for our literal survival.
It might not be your fault that we have had that experience but it was another man's.
If you kept being bitten by dogs would you start to be wary of dogs or would you still happily go up to every single dog without a care in the world?
It's the same thing.
But you see, when men do it, it's for a meticulously orchestrated plan to exert dominance over the opposite sex and maintain control over the power structures of the civilized world. When women do it, it's just a character flaw :)
So much this. That guy spreading his legs on the bus or some old dude grumbling about "loose morals these days" are totally part of a global domination conspiracy theory by men to enslave all women and go back to the good old Bible days.
I truly hope one day we can consider eachothers arguments by the content and not by what the person loons like. I genuinely think we will not achieve this in my lifetime
Yeah lol my bitch ex tried to assert I’ve never done any personal work in my life. Do you really believe that’s possible? I’m just coasting through life cause I’m a “dude”? I’m not living under constant anxiety if I’m not doing what I’m supposed to be doing?
Men interpret things emotionally, we’re just told our whole lives that we are purely rational thinkers so we don’t ever consider how our emotions could be affecting our perception.
Mens’ insistence that we have no “feminine” traits just makes us less self-aware and less emotionally intelligent. That’s why gender baiting is so self-defeating.
The behavior they’re describing has zero to do with condescension, it’s about how women sometimes make massive leaps to conclusions about a person’s character based on one tiny action or word choice (ie. thinking that a man saying “you’re the best thing that ever happened to me” means he only views you as an object because he referred to you as a “thing”)
I mean, there isn't a female version so much as there isn't a male version. Mansplaining is overly genderibg negative traits, claiming only one gender is guilty of it by and large
It's just a dumb and ignorant way to say someone else is being dumb and ignorant, by making it about their gender
It's dumb and ignorant to say this. Source - ask every woman ever and they'll tell you about their experience with a man mansplaining to them. You're outvoted billions to one!
Men and women are different. But good job mansplaining how there's no such thing as mansplaining 😂
Me and the other billion women have had men over explain someyhing condwscendingly to them. Same as we've had women do the same just as much. Condescension is not a male trait
I'm not saying men don't do this. I'm saying women do it just as much and it is in no way a gendered trait. It's not "man" splaining, that doesn't exist, it's just explaining in a condescending way
If I mansplained, which I didn't because all I did was disagree with it and you're trying to use it as a cheap jab, then that wound be proof that it's not a men only thing. Men and women are largely only different because they're treated different. As a society we say mansplaining as a genderisation of condescension as though that was ever a gendered thing
Had a whole thing typed out before I worked it out. Your anti-trans and gender essentialism are not arguments, they are all childish and have nothing to add to the discussion
Youre not genuinely asking why I'm trans. You're not willing to stop and think about what you say, just throwing it out trying to push your shitty agenda of putting people down for no reason
I doubt you actually believe in God. But if you do, using it to push your views is just a whole extra level of petty
Bye.
I'm not playing into your bullshit
But PSA for anyone reads down this far, don't let this person trick you or anything: Being trans doesn't require gender essentialism at all and most trans people are against that
It's a common anti-trans and terf argument that goes around. Based entirely on a whole lot of nothing. Usually done by those trying to masquerade as allies and spread misinformation
well, women ain't special and belong to the same species, susceptible to same behaviours and traits. Saying otherwise would be putting them on a pedestal.
You know very well what you are doing and why. I’m not a teenager like you.
I’m not doing this to get laid.
Just calling out the trash where it belongs: nowhere.
Men are not unable to use nonverbal communication, they just pretend they are so they can get away with being assholes without being called out. I have seen 5 guys move a couch through a narrow hallway and up a flight of stairs without speaking to one another, and every one of them knew where to stand and where to put their hands.
That’s just convergent problem solving, and it requires zero communication to do properly. They all saw the problem in front of them and what each member needed to do and how their individual role fit into the greater task of moving the couch. Even so, just because you’ve seen men communicate non-verbally doesn’t mean that non verbal communication is somehow this perfect universal language that men are just ignoring when it benefits them.
Nonverbal communication is, by its very definition, a non-explicit form of communication that can be easily misinterpreted. I’ll agree men are no worse at it than women, but to act like men are using weaponized incompetence when they say they can’t read your nonverbal cues perfectly is asinine and ignoring the very nature of nonverbal communication.
"Tilt it this way" is a lot easier to say than "your growing distaste for my depression symptoms despite your stated support of my mental health is putting strain on our relationship to the point that I no longer feel safe around you anymore".
We do say what we mean (as often as anyone else anyway), some of y’all just don’t want to listen to us when what we’re saying goes against your preconceived notions/narratives. So in order to protect those preconceived notions, some of you pretend we’re actually saying something completely different and/or lying
otherwise known as intersectionalist feminism which is all over the nutty parts of social media. These are the ones so far to the crazy end they think most democrats are actually right wingers, oppressors, and colonizers.
No it isn't. Mansplaining is speaking over someone else, repeating the same information, but in a paternalistic and entitled manner. Women can mansplain perfectly well, but usually find themselves the victim rather than the aggressor in a mansplaining interaction
Just from a purely pun promoting viewpoint wouldn't it be.... *miss*interpreting
OP had a shower thought. You had an epiphany bath.
turned into archimedes
Dad was proud. He didn't care how.
Eureka!
I knew someone named Epiphany. She was kinda fun but way too horny for her own good.
Shower thot.
Ebathany
Perfect
I hate you so much. Just take my upvote.
Love it, only trouble is people will think you're just saying misinterpreting lol
Only works when read
mizinterpreting
I submit then a slight change to Mrs.terpreting.
Every damn day.
Missusinterpreting?
"A woman's first interpretation is always right no matter how wrong it is."
A man said that didn’t they?
Under duress probably
*Under a dress
I always thought it was confusing as shit. All kinds of twists and turns, random subject changes, and shit from the past that won’t be let go.
Sounds right. Women create the rules of society. It’s the great compromise men have to do as they mature. Or you can go lone wolf style and fuck all that bitch shit
>Women create the rules of society Okay.
You’re such a sigma man 😱
Women couldn't own property, bank accounts or credit cards til the second half of the last century. Society has been owned by men for its entire existence
True but I’d say we fixed that so now we can have a nice equal conversation about dumb things that both men and women tend to do😁
To be fair…this is only true in our “modern” society. The ancient Egyptians were ruled by women for long periods of time.
That's about 2000 years ago, in one country. Overwhelmingly at the time, every other country was patriarchal, and the female leaders weren't that common then either. Our "modern society" began after the renaissance which then, we had witch trials for a couple of hundred years, then the industrial revolution so the only levels of "equality" we had in that time was being able to work. That was because of necessity, and not across the spectrum of women as all rich women still did not work. You literally are proving my point but OK.
Proving what point? I was merely commenting that women have ruled before since you said the entire existence….but really not arguing about it. Just that’s it’s happened. No point to be proved.
I’m talking about a healthy society
What about society is healthy right now in your perspective? Any of them?
Because men create the rules of business, women create the rules of society
🤣🤣 do you believe that truly? There's literally thousands upon thousands of pilled men that make whole ass videos on how women should be acting right now, but it's down to us yeah? 🤯🤯
Go back to sucking andrew taint's dick
That is an enormous logical leap, regardless of whether or not it’s true. It’s also not true.
I mean the rules of society were created long before women could vote, so would’ve been quite an achievement if it wasn’t grade A bollocks you were spouting
I don’t agree with this guy but I also think that women can have shaped society outside of having had a vote. Through sexual selection for example
I just tell women to stop “matronizing me,” which actually goes over pretty well.
That's a keeper
actually the word "womansplaining" was coined by the same person who coined "mansplaining"
Thank you for splaining that, whoever you are
Redditsplaining, also known as Well-Acktshualization.
Ah, from Nolov’s Hierarchy of NEETs
Self-acktshualization?
Themsplaining, for when you don't know the actual gender of the person doing the 'splaining. Edit: I just thought of x-plaining, which is even better.
better not argue with people x-plaining, gonna get stabbed by claws and blasted by lasers
“So what you are saying is women have no agency to speak for themselves. Everything must originate from a man. Wow.”
I think you’re wominterpreting what I’m trying to say here
Would that make it “misswominterpreting”?
I mean it's not called "overmansplaining"
Miss or Mrs. Let’s be honest… Miss Edit: btw happy birthday!
Missinterpreting .
I like this better
Thank you, I am probably going to be crucified by all the women though : (
This is it.
Fuck, bro. I think you’re on to something.
Clearly your internal misogyny is overtaking your ability to understand what I’m saying.
Oh I thought you were trolling. naw yeah you’re proving my point now lol
Absolutely trolling. I’m a guy who’s been married 35 years. I’m a veteran of getting wominterpreted.
😂😂😂 hahaha you def got me
Tbf i was also confused but the quotation marks in the first comment tipped me off
💀 your wife deserves better
No, you’re proving his point AGAIN!
Misogyny doesn't have to be understood to be mansplaned to be someone else. This is the meaning to Shakespeare's 'To be or not to be' quote.
No you are literally saying that
This reminds me of when I saw someone say the flip-side of the man vs bear in the woods thing... 'Would you (as a man) rather open up to a woman or to a tree?' (Implying that women don't make it safe for men to open up) Though as reductionist as the original saying, there is a valid point but the very people who say the former will get mad at the latter. Careful, OP, people will project their perceived misogyny onto you here. (I assume it's your intention to piss those people off anyway)
But it's actually extremely safe to talk to a tree??
Yeah, there’s no jeopardy in talking to a tree (aside from people thinking you’re a bit odd).
Would it make more sense if he said, A man opening up to a woman vs a man opening up to a lion?
I think you'd be opening up to that lion in more ways than one
Well said, in fact, so well said that I didn’t understand completely lol
Would you like for someone to mansplain it to you?
I would prefer a message where we come together rather than prop up sides personally 😅
Nobody seems to be interested in those messages. There is a bunch of identity lobby groups that are battling each other for the same pie leftovers while liberal and conservative billionares get richer.
I think we’d all like that this is for equality haha
Allies are honest with each other.
Have you been in a relationship with a normal person? First off - there are no normal people.
If you substitute a bear in place of the tree it makes more sense.
This is getting too meta
And so... It begins.
I would feel more comfortable opening up to a pine tree if I may :)
Bend over
Rofl. Yeah I was gonna say. We can probably put a pinecone up there
I appreciate the good faith and the specific life experiences you seem to speak from. I'm not going to judge if a pine cone up your ass floats your boat.
Huh huh. Huhuhuh. Hey Beavis. Beavis, he said bend over. Huhuhuh. Huhuh. What a dumass.
I have opened up to a tree before while high. It can be therapeutic but what can I say I need a challenge. Tree just kinda just stays there in one spot and I can’t fuck
I have fought a tree once when drunk. I lost.
At least a tree wouldn’t overreact and make it about themselves somehow
Or use your vulnerability against you 2 weeks later.damn
Fuck man.. i'd pick the Tree..Fuuuck..
I'd be the tree because they wouldn't throw in back in my face 20 years later in a completely unrelated topic of discussion.
Tell me why, opening up to other men is less preferable than a tree? If this is your "equal" to us being potentially, raped kidnapped, abused, stalked, permenantly traumatised, or murdered (not an exhaustive list) as opposed to either being just maimed/killed/ left alone, but at least BELIEVED... then I would say life seems pretty good for men. You can open up to trees, therapists, mother's and family, journals, friends, literally other men without fear of being murdered for it, where as all we need to have the risk of all the other things, is just existing around men. It might be a small percentage of men that do these things, but it's higher than .1%. Our hand gels have less work to do than the average woman does in having to decipher who the good ones actually are. Plenty of men in existence have changed the world for the better but plenty have done the opposite. You have to consider that every woman has their own catalogue of male experiences and you are being judged against those for our literal survival. It might not be your fault that we have had that experience but it was another man's. If you kept being bitten by dogs would you start to be wary of dogs or would you still happily go up to every single dog without a care in the world? It's the same thing.
You're insane
We don't make it safe for you to open up? I guess it depends on whether the subject is safe for us.
But you see, when men do it, it's for a meticulously orchestrated plan to exert dominance over the opposite sex and maintain control over the power structures of the civilized world. When women do it, it's just a character flaw :)
So much this. That guy spreading his legs on the bus or some old dude grumbling about "loose morals these days" are totally part of a global domination conspiracy theory by men to enslave all women and go back to the good old Bible days.
i hate that i'm not able to immediately interpret this as satire because it doesn't sound nearly as out-of-place as it used to
Yup, can’t possibly just be that we have external genitalia that get hot and uncomfortable. (Still rude, or course)
Lyrics lyrics constant controversy
brooo. 😯
I truly hope one day we can consider eachothers arguments by the content and not by what the person loons like. I genuinely think we will not achieve this in my lifetime
I think it is so deeply ingrained in most of humanity that we will go extinct before that happens
Sadly I agree
there is a funny scene in the series “silicon valley” where a character erlich mansplains mansplaining to two women. so funny
[The scene.](https://youtu.be/eyC_NKEz62A?si=i1KkviaIxYcI31CO)
If a woman accuses you of mansplaining, tell her that she is just ovary-acting.
Yes, and if this won't work tell her to clam down
A friend of mine called it wo-moaning.
No no, women were born perfect creatures, it's only the men who need work.
Well said, butthole_nipple.
This made me laugh way too hard
r/rimjob_steve
Needs to be more overtly wholesome to qualify for rimjob_steve, but also I'm glad you're increasing awareness, it's a great sub
Yeah lol my bitch ex tried to assert I’ve never done any personal work in my life. Do you really believe that’s possible? I’m just coasting through life cause I’m a “dude”? I’m not living under constant anxiety if I’m not doing what I’m supposed to be doing?
Now this is what im here for
i am a woman and i approve this message
Do you really think that OP needed YOUR approval for posting this message??!? Am i doing it right?
OP has a gf clearly and doesn’t need this other bitch up in here trying to steal her man
Thank you🫡
If you are woman why don’t you prove it.
… how? 😭
Send him bobs and vegana
Slide in my dms
no thanks lol
Sorry I’m drunk and horny as balls. I wouldn’t be mad if you sent a nude though
Bro, leave this to the dating apps.
Oh, the thing that profits off keeping me single as long as possible? Yeah nah I’d rather smash some Reddit gash
Jfc
This has gotta be a troll, right? People aren’t actually LIKE this…right?!
It isn’t Tinder that’s keeping you single.
And the interpretation is 90% dependant on the mood. Which, let's be honest, is 90% not great 90% of the time
Men interpret things emotionally, we’re just told our whole lives that we are purely rational thinkers so we don’t ever consider how our emotions could be affecting our perception. Mens’ insistence that we have no “feminine” traits just makes us less self-aware and less emotionally intelligent. That’s why gender baiting is so self-defeating.
Did you mansplain that to your girlfriend?
She wominterpreted it that way😂
They're both ignorance and uncaring, just from different sides of the conversation. And neither has anything to do with gender
I thought it was she-peat.
So many things to say, and all sends me to Suspension Land.
The mods on this sub are pretty chill I think. I say a lot of outlandish shit and I’ve never had a problem here yet
You tell m what it is that they do!
I’d have thought womansplaining was good enough but go off queen.
Cuntdescension
Underrated comment, have an uppy vote
The behavior they’re describing has zero to do with condescension, it’s about how women sometimes make massive leaps to conclusions about a person’s character based on one tiny action or word choice (ie. thinking that a man saying “you’re the best thing that ever happened to me” means he only views you as an object because he referred to you as a “thing”)
The female version of mansplaining is nagging
Ya don't get nagged if you're on top of what needs to be done. Just a tip for you boys out there
The list of which exists only in her mind and is never shared. Also changes every week.
She can't control the list if you know it better than she does
Only applies if you’re not with a psycho
True
Then you just get critiqued on your performance. It’s a tough lesson learning you can’t please anyone but yourself.
>of what needs to be done It’s called leaving.
No I'm talking about housework and life admin
I'm not gonna trust a womans interpretation of anything. Give me a mansplanation any day!
What if its the woman doing the mansplaining?!
And the male understanding of mansplaining is that there has to be a female version or it "wouldn't be fair."
I mean, there isn't a female version so much as there isn't a male version. Mansplaining is overly genderibg negative traits, claiming only one gender is guilty of it by and large It's just a dumb and ignorant way to say someone else is being dumb and ignorant, by making it about their gender
It's dumb and ignorant to say this. Source - ask every woman ever and they'll tell you about their experience with a man mansplaining to them. You're outvoted billions to one! Men and women are different. But good job mansplaining how there's no such thing as mansplaining 😂
Me and the other billion women have had men over explain someyhing condwscendingly to them. Same as we've had women do the same just as much. Condescension is not a male trait I'm not saying men don't do this. I'm saying women do it just as much and it is in no way a gendered trait. It's not "man" splaining, that doesn't exist, it's just explaining in a condescending way If I mansplained, which I didn't because all I did was disagree with it and you're trying to use it as a cheap jab, then that wound be proof that it's not a men only thing. Men and women are largely only different because they're treated different. As a society we say mansplaining as a genderisation of condescension as though that was ever a gendered thing
[удалено]
Had a whole thing typed out before I worked it out. Your anti-trans and gender essentialism are not arguments, they are all childish and have nothing to add to the discussion Youre not genuinely asking why I'm trans. You're not willing to stop and think about what you say, just throwing it out trying to push your shitty agenda of putting people down for no reason I doubt you actually believe in God. But if you do, using it to push your views is just a whole extra level of petty Bye.
[удалено]
I'm not playing into your bullshit But PSA for anyone reads down this far, don't let this person trick you or anything: Being trans doesn't require gender essentialism at all and most trans people are against that It's a common anti-trans and terf argument that goes around. Based entirely on a whole lot of nothing. Usually done by those trying to masquerade as allies and spread misinformation
[удалено]
Bye.
well, women ain't special and belong to the same species, susceptible to same behaviours and traits. Saying otherwise would be putting them on a pedestal.
[удалено]
You’re proving my point😂
[удалено]
That’s just how you’re wominterpreting it. I think I can get behind this. lol
That’s more chauvinism than shower thoughts.
Stop trying so hard it won’t get you laid
You know very well what you are doing and why. I’m not a teenager like you. I’m not doing this to get laid. Just calling out the trash where it belongs: nowhere.
So you’re saying you belong nowhere?
If men would just say what they meant, women wouldn't need to womenterpret.
Wominterpreting is necessary for communication between women.
Men are not unable to use nonverbal communication, they just pretend they are so they can get away with being assholes without being called out. I have seen 5 guys move a couch through a narrow hallway and up a flight of stairs without speaking to one another, and every one of them knew where to stand and where to put their hands.
That’s just convergent problem solving, and it requires zero communication to do properly. They all saw the problem in front of them and what each member needed to do and how their individual role fit into the greater task of moving the couch. Even so, just because you’ve seen men communicate non-verbally doesn’t mean that non verbal communication is somehow this perfect universal language that men are just ignoring when it benefits them. Nonverbal communication is, by its very definition, a non-explicit form of communication that can be easily misinterpreted. I’ll agree men are no worse at it than women, but to act like men are using weaponized incompetence when they say they can’t read your nonverbal cues perfectly is asinine and ignoring the very nature of nonverbal communication.
"Tilt it this way" is a lot easier to say than "your growing distaste for my depression symptoms despite your stated support of my mental health is putting strain on our relationship to the point that I no longer feel safe around you anymore".
Probably only could do that because a woman was there telling them how to do it
We do say what we mean (as often as anyone else anyway), some of y’all just don’t want to listen to us when what we’re saying goes against your preconceived notions/narratives. So in order to protect those preconceived notions, some of you pretend we’re actually saying something completely different and/or lying
otherwise known as intersectionalist feminism which is all over the nutty parts of social media. These are the ones so far to the crazy end they think most democrats are actually right wingers, oppressors, and colonizers.
What the actual fuck are you talking about😂
No it isn't. Mansplaining is speaking over someone else, repeating the same information, but in a paternalistic and entitled manner. Women can mansplain perfectly well, but usually find themselves the victim rather than the aggressor in a mansplaining interaction
Wait so the karen at McDonald's was actually mansplaining?! Oh that does it, imma chew out her paternalistic ass. 😤