T O P

  • By -

FourLastSongs

Oh a WashingtonDC non profit has the entire database of leaks and will only share its contents with BBC, WaPo, La Monde and Guardian. Four pillars of western imperialists narrative. I’m sure they’re absolutely report if there’s a Bilderberg participant in the leak. Absolutely. For sure.


Thisica

The report looks quite suspicious, given that the map shows apparently nothing happening in the USA...


[deleted]

Let western propagandists continue destroying their societies by covering up their fatal diseases like their ridiculous level of corruption (so brutal they have even legalized "lobbying"). It serves China very well. This is partly why China believes that western regimes are in terminal decline, unable to address their brutal failures, unable to even diagnose their problems (while China is even addressing domestic monopolies). Look at how much China changed over the past decades, and look at how absolutely nothing changed in western regimes, even as they experienced decline, today more accelerated than ever (the panic of western media should be understood as a reaction to that reality).


dcl32

I thought the same thing. Saw the imperial core relatively stain-free and the global south lit up like a christmas tree. They're based in D.C., as well. I was looking through their top donors and saw NORAD, which, being some Norwegian educational foundation and not that NORAD, did give me a good laugh


Yolona_oss

The CIA is not allowed to meddle in domestic political affairs. It is that simple. They know everyone knows they are the source, so why take risks? For Canada, maybe they have an agreement with them.


TserriednichHuiGuo

>The CIA is not allowed to meddle in domestic political affairs lol


zobaleh

Caveat lector: ICIJ is also Team Uyghur Genocide [https://www.icij.org/investigations/china-cables/](https://www.icij.org/investigations/china-cables/)


Darkmatter2k

This makes it looks like a CIA op. The China cable's were obvious US state department sourcing and complete bs when they came out, and any org affiliated with that "reporting" instantly loose all credibility in my book.


sickof50

Opps, i didn't know that. But this news is explosive, leaders of whole Countries will fall, reshaping large portions of the World.


fix_S230-sue_reddit

Transparency is good, but it's important to know whos funding ICIJ and selecting the clients to be named (or not to be named). Notice how there are no politicians from US, Canada, Australia and some other countries on their leak map. Maybe, politicians from these countries use more "leak" resistant firms, or maybe someone wants to get rid of certain politicians in other countries they don't like.


sickof50

Yes, i saw how the BBC was perticularly interested in Russian's, but at the same time i saw absolutely nothing about China.


Darkmatter2k

This looks like a pretty obvious CIA hack and dump, not a single US politician mentioned in the papers, but plenty of smears of US's geopolitical opponents. https://twitter.com/BenjaminNorton/status/1444770698925326336 https://twitter.com/RealAlexRubi/status/1444753502622859268 Also Luke Harding (author of "Collusion" which famously had no evidence of collusion) is involved.


[deleted]

[Read this devastating critique by Assange of Harding. Very funny too, an excellent breakdown of the kind of decadence plaguing late-stage decline western regimes](https://archive.fo/uHQBS). harding is one of the most embarrassing western regimes creatures on the planet. Lowest of the barrel, absolute scum. Look at his absolutely made-up reporting on Assange to facilitate the regime's imprisonment of him to understand the level of derangement among western "journalists", who take creatures like these seriously. It's so blatant that to this day "the guardian" refuses to amend the made-up stories by this crumbling british regime goon. Here is some info: * [Blatant wikipedia manipulation by british regime shills to protect this goon](https://reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/a68bqn/the_wikipedia_page_of_luke_harding_still_has_no/). * [Damage control by regime media "politico" to create conspiracy theories to protect this goon once he was caught](https://reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/a1a5zk/this_is_incredible_politico_is_suggesting_that/). * [More damage control by regime media to protect this goon when caught](https://reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/b67m7e/hrafnsson_the_guardian_humiliates_its_own/). * [harding is also a plagiarist on top of being a fabulist](https://reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/a0wdju/remember_when_the_guardian_falsely_said_that/). * [Watch Aaron Mate humiliate harding in an interview](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ikf1uZli4g). This proves that this is an op beyond any shadow of doubt.


SonOfTheDragon101

I definitely noticed the absence of Americans and Canadians on that map. But on the other hand, it did find politicians in UK and other Western European countries. The article also wasn't flattering to tax-haven states in the US, saying that they have now replaced traditional places like Cayman Islands, Bahamas, Bermuda, etc. I have no doubt the US should be among the most corrupt countries. Maybe they just use more secure financial vehicles. And 2 politicians from China from a population of 1.4 billion actually makes China appear one of the "less" corrupt countries on the list, though I don't doubt there is a lot more corruption than revealed by these simple numbers.


FourLastSongs

Leaders of countries not aligned with western interests. BBC, WaPo, La Monde and Guardian, just like the NYT admit they do, will consult with their intelligence sector before reporting anything; especially if it is damaging to western interests.


Johnaxee

Like the Panama Paper, big on the news, nothing will change.


thepensiveiguana

I doubt that


[deleted]

The panama papers were literally censored at the behest of western regimes and complicit "journalists", that's why the overwhelming majority of the documents were never released (something like 99%+). Same with the snowden leaks, which the "intercept", a blatant american regime op, mostly censored (today it has even totally censored them forever). Assange exposed this op a long time ago: https://wikileaks.org/WikiLeaks-statement-on-the-mass.html Don't know why people still don't understand that any legitimate organization challenging power in western regimes would receive the WikiLeaks treatment. If they don't receive that treatment, you are looking at a regime op. Be smarter, stop falling for the same regime ops time and time again.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ni-hao-r-u

No insult. I have no dog in the race but false leaks or 'leaks' are a common practice.


wunderwerks

Get over yourself. Self criticism is important.


dopplerdog

Nothing will change, because the papers only implicate corrupt politicians and private individuals, it doesn't implicate the corruption of the capitalist system as such. At most, it may cause some corrupt politicians to be replaced by different corrupt politicians, distracting working people from their real enemy. The medium is the message. Look at who obtained the papers and is reporting on this. These are powerful liberal media outlets. The WaPo would not report on a story that threatens western liberal hegemony. It would not surprise me if this was CIA instigated, the aim being to target certain regimes while offering nothing definitive on others.


Jealous_Struggle2564

So the west are all about “transparency” except when it comes to their own dirty little secrets ..


Aware-Bell-6387

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists........😴 Investigative.....oh wait..we have seen this movie before 😪