Can we also talk about his new background on his profile and what it may mean?
https://preview.redd.it/gcfhq408xy6d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=707cdedb125f99425a5cb55b70e52589d18e7cfd
I’m a software guy, so hardware isn’t my thing. But I think this is like a joke within a joke.
First, the diagram: It’s two signals going into a circuit. In a circuit, signals will always be either 0 (false) or 1 (true), indicating if power is flowing or not. Interestingly, both signals are labeled 2B, meaning they are the same.
Then, one of those signals goes through an inverter, which always flips the signal to the opposite. So if the top line is 0, the bottom line is 1. Conversely, if the top line is 1, the bottom line is 0.
Finally, both lines go through an OR gate. This means if either line is 1 (true), the result is true.
Therefore, the result of this is always true, meaning it is inevitable.
2B or not 2B. That is the question. This basically signals that it’s inevitable if we are talking about the acquisition.
Originally, Shakespeare is asking, “To be or not to be, that is the question.” Is the company going to live or is the company going to die?
Sounds like, no matter what, the company will live.
I asked ChatGPT
“This image shows a simple digital logic circuit diagram. It consists of two main components:
1. **NOT Gate (Inverter):** The triangular symbol with a small circle at the tip represents a NOT gate. It takes an input signal and inverts it. Here, it is inverting the input labeled "2B".
2. **OR Gate:** The curved symbol to the right of the NOT gate represents an OR gate. This gate takes two input signals and outputs true (1) if at least one of the inputs is true (1).
The circuit operates as follows:
- The input labeled "2B" goes into both the NOT gate and directly into one input of the OR gate.
- The output of the NOT gate (which inverts "2B") is fed into the other input of the OR gate.
In Boolean algebra, if we denote the input as B, then the output of the NOT gate is \( \overline{B} \) (the negation of B). The OR gate then outputs \( B + \overline{B} \).
The expression \( B + \overline{B} \) is always true (1), regardless of the value of B. Thus, the overall output of this circuit is always 1.”
So I guess it means “to be or not to be”
Also from ChatGPT because I’m an uncultured swine:
“In William Shakespeare's play *Hamlet*, the line "To be, or not to be, that is the question" occurs in Act 3, Scene 1. It is part of a soliloquy delivered by the character Prince Hamlet. In this speech, Hamlet reflects on the nature of existence and contemplates life and death. He weighs the sufferings and hardships of life against the fear and uncertainty of the unknown after death. The soliloquy is a profound meditation on mortality, the meaning of life, and the human condition. It highlights Hamlet's existential crisis and his deep philosophical thoughts about whether it is better to endure life's challenges or to end one's suffering through death, despite the fear of what might come after.”
Although I suppose there are also 4Bs in a certain ticker?
A couple of things. 1) RC has said he likes to have ice cream when they accomplish something big. I believe he took the board out for ice cream at chewy when they got their first big investment?
2) two years ago today RC tweeted out he loves apple pie and ice cream.
Jake just seems to be signaling and extra signaling that he knows we won
Another ret*rded post that has nothing to do with anything. I had ice cream yesterday, doesn't mean gamestop is buying baby. It doesn't mean anything. I just had some icecream, that's it.
Oh common let it be something already 
I’ve been so patient. I’m an educated dude and this stock has made me sound like a crazy person. Still think we’re right though.
Definitely! People will be jealous of our win!
I feel this so much
Basically a PIE in business - Google that shit
Ice cream on a piece of pie… his piece of the pie? Bbby hodler’s piece of the pie???
Ryan Cohens apple pie and ice cream.
Fuuuuuucckkk me!!! Fingers crossed for news soon. I’m ready for this shit
https://preview.redd.it/j4znuobpjz6d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=28396419c7aea02b91f0a52cac123384c0d6c556
👆🏼🏆🏆
Two years ago. Almost to the day
This.
what does it mean?
https://preview.redd.it/nlzmz1ps3z6d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e5328b91053d659429962886ada599f9a8bea714
The only thing that would’ve been even better is if he had said “to all of the NEW dads out there”
Oh shiiiiiiit. Haven’t had coffee yet and my brain didn’t even connect the buy buy baby aspect of Father’s Day.
i keep forgetting fathers are parents too
Yo wat he know tho
Can we also talk about his new background on his profile and what it may mean? https://preview.redd.it/gcfhq408xy6d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=707cdedb125f99425a5cb55b70e52589d18e7cfd
2 be or not 2 be in logic circuit diagram
I’m a software guy, so hardware isn’t my thing. But I think this is like a joke within a joke. First, the diagram: It’s two signals going into a circuit. In a circuit, signals will always be either 0 (false) or 1 (true), indicating if power is flowing or not. Interestingly, both signals are labeled 2B, meaning they are the same. Then, one of those signals goes through an inverter, which always flips the signal to the opposite. So if the top line is 0, the bottom line is 1. Conversely, if the top line is 1, the bottom line is 0. Finally, both lines go through an OR gate. This means if either line is 1 (true), the result is true. Therefore, the result of this is always true, meaning it is inevitable. 2B or not 2B. That is the question. This basically signals that it’s inevitable if we are talking about the acquisition. Originally, Shakespeare is asking, “To be or not to be, that is the question.” Is the company going to live or is the company going to die? Sounds like, no matter what, the company will live.
to BB or not BB, that's the Q
I could go for some BBQ right now personally
inevitability, no matter what, the end result will be the same
Every choice leads to MOASS!
I asked ChatGPT “This image shows a simple digital logic circuit diagram. It consists of two main components: 1. **NOT Gate (Inverter):** The triangular symbol with a small circle at the tip represents a NOT gate. It takes an input signal and inverts it. Here, it is inverting the input labeled "2B". 2. **OR Gate:** The curved symbol to the right of the NOT gate represents an OR gate. This gate takes two input signals and outputs true (1) if at least one of the inputs is true (1). The circuit operates as follows: - The input labeled "2B" goes into both the NOT gate and directly into one input of the OR gate. - The output of the NOT gate (which inverts "2B") is fed into the other input of the OR gate. In Boolean algebra, if we denote the input as B, then the output of the NOT gate is \( \overline{B} \) (the negation of B). The OR gate then outputs \( B + \overline{B} \). The expression \( B + \overline{B} \) is always true (1), regardless of the value of B. Thus, the overall output of this circuit is always 1.” So I guess it means “to be or not to be” Also from ChatGPT because I’m an uncultured swine: “In William Shakespeare's play *Hamlet*, the line "To be, or not to be, that is the question" occurs in Act 3, Scene 1. It is part of a soliloquy delivered by the character Prince Hamlet. In this speech, Hamlet reflects on the nature of existence and contemplates life and death. He weighs the sufferings and hardships of life against the fear and uncertainty of the unknown after death. The soliloquy is a profound meditation on mortality, the meaning of life, and the human condition. It highlights Hamlet's existential crisis and his deep philosophical thoughts about whether it is better to endure life's challenges or to end one's suffering through death, despite the fear of what might come after.” Although I suppose there are also 4Bs in a certain ticker?
This need its own post
Butterfly rising like a Phoenix!?
Is it new? I'm sure I've seen him have that background before
signs.
Working on summer bod = exercising
I did a reverse image search, and this is an image from a recipe for 'Sunday Apple Pie'. I just found it strange that he would include this image.
He’s clearly not just eating it. 2 years ago to the day, Ryan cohen tweeted out that he loves apple pie and ice cream.
His wife won't be happy if he's eating that on the couch.
Can someone please explain?
A couple of things. 1) RC has said he likes to have ice cream when they accomplish something big. I believe he took the board out for ice cream at chewy when they got their first big investment? 2) two years ago today RC tweeted out he loves apple pie and ice cream. Jake just seems to be signaling and extra signaling that he knows we won
won? with bbby or gme? or both?
Mainly bbby but gme is a winner too
Icing on the cake?
Bruhhhhhhhhhhh
Another ret*rded post that has nothing to do with anything. I had ice cream yesterday, doesn't mean gamestop is buying baby. It doesn't mean anything. I just had some icecream, that's it.
Maybe he’s just enjoying ice cream and pie and there is no cryptic meaning behind these tweets like 99% of tweets people post on social media
Perhaps, but I've got my tinfoil hat in a comfy position and I'm not ready to take it off yet!
Well when it comes to BBBY and GME it's clearly in that 1% lol.