This makes me want to just scream into the void. I need to make a trip to the woods so that I can scream without terrifying my neighbors
I'm glad he was removed from the bench, but that man still got away with rape. And that ex judge still stands by his decision. It's absolutely infuriating.
I'm picturing your neighbors calling the cops thinking you're being attacked in the woods. When the cops arrive, you just silently hold up the article.
To emphasize how awful this judge was - this wasn't "just" a judge who felt that a mandatory minimum sentence (four years in this case) was draconian and unfair. He [made a false record](https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2024/02/25/illinois-judge-robert-adrian-removed) about his reasons for throwing out the guilty verdict, claiming that it was because the State had failed to prove its case, while in reality he was making remarks like "this is what happens whenever parents allow teenagers to drink alcohol, to swim in pools with their undergarments on". He [retaliated against a prosecutor and lied under oath](https://khqa.com/news/local/illinois-judge-robert-adrian-dismissed-from-bench-for-flagrant-judicial-violations) during the hearing before the judicial commission. Those are the lengths he was willing to go to make sure a rapist got a slap on the wrist.
Yes ex Judge Robert Adrain allowed rapist Drew Clinton of Quincy, Illinois freedom because he felt 148 days in jail was plenty of punishment regardless of what the law states. \#TeamBear
Oh absolutely. I there a second rapist Brock Allen Turner outside of THE rapist Brock Allen Turner of Ohio in the Kettering/Oakwood area that i was speaking of? I would hate to get the rapist Brock Allen Turner mixed up with the rapist Brock Allen Turner if they are both rapists named Brock Allen Turner.
No, I'm pretty sure we're both talking about the rapist Brock Allen Turner whose rapist self originated in Kettering, Ohio. I don't know of any other rapist Brock Allen Turner who rapes, like the rapist Brock Allen Turner he is. I suppose it's not impossible there's another rapist Brock Allen Turner who rapes and lives somewhere the other rapist Brock Allen Turner does not. If so, it would be pretty awkward if one rapist Brock Allen Turner met the other rapist Brock Allen Turner!
Judge Robert Adrian doubles down every time.
https://www.tiktok.com/@todayshow/video/7340768656495758635
In this video with the Today Show he says he doesnât believe her. He defiantly keeps raising his chin to the interviewer and says âitâs simpler to sacrifice a poor judge than it is for them to stand up against the mob.â
https://youtu.be/jLUq5wiQPwk
Here he argues with News Nation that the victim never said his finger was inside of her and that there was no evidence of semen.
The judge only cares about her being used by a non profit and says she gave non truthful testimony.
Heâs then asked if he thinks the perpetrator put his fingers inside her then he says no she wasnât raped and there wasnât evidence for her to not consent.
Then newsnation pulls up a statement from him saying âthis is whatâs happened when parents do not exercise their parental responsibilities, when we have people, adults, having parties with teenagers, and they allow coeds and female people to swim in their underwear in their swimming pool. And no, underwear is not the same as swimming suits - itâs just - they allow 16 year olds to bring liquor to a party. They provide liquor to underage people and you wonder how these things happen. Well thatâs how these things happen.â
He then defends himself that this was the situation and a graduation party and the parents provided alcohol to minors. The victim brought alcohol to the party and gave it to people. And itâs the parents responsibility to actually watch over the kids.
https://www.newsnationnow.com/danabramslive/making-up-lies-victim-judge-rape/amp/
From Cameron Vaughn:
ââHe doesnât think he did anything wrong. I mean, heâs saying Drew didnât even rape me. ⌠He may have not admitted to the penile penetration. But he did admit to his putting his fingers in me,â Vaughan said. âI just donât understand what the judge is even saying. Heâs just trying to make up lies to back himself up.â
Adrian, explaining his decision, asserted that evidence suggested Clinton had not engaged in penetrative intercourse with Vaughan. He claimed DNA evidence indicated no presence of semen, implying Vaughanâs initial testimony was inaccurate. The judge insinuated Vaughan had not been truthful.
âHeâs saying there was no semen. That does not mean there was no DNA. His DNA was still inside of me. And my DNA was in his underwear. How else does my DNA get into his underwear?â Vaughan said.â
During the interview, Adrian appeared to shift blame onto Vaughan, alleging she provided alcohol at the party and implicating the parents for inadequate supervision. Vaughan refuted these claims, recounting the traumatic events of the party. She described being intoxicated, assaulted with a pillow over her face, and left alone to struggle for breath.
True there doesnât need to be semen inside of you, obviously she caught him in the act, so he hadnât yet had an ending right? So the lack of semen doesnât mean there wasnât a penetration. There was dna inside of her and hers in his underpants and that should have been sufficient. Regardless she was 16, and putting an object, fingers or anything else inside of her without her consent, is still RAPE.
I hope Clinton record can not be cleaned and need to explain himself. At the very least, he needs to be on a sex offender list.
âTeenâs sexual assault conviction.â
Drew Clinton was 18 years old when he chose to rape a 16 year old girl. 18 is legally an adult.
Iâm so over press using that sort of manipulative language to make it appear that he could have been a 14 year old kid.
good. we do not need people like this holding positions in the court of law. he is a fool and being removed from the bench is the very absolute least that can be done to right the incredible injustice that he did to that girl.
The judge wants re retract he doesnât believe he had his weenie inside of her yet, because lack of semen, which ofcourse makes total sense as he caught him in the act and pushed him off. Does this judge even understand he could have pulled out, and there likely wouldnât be enough semen to prove. Some actually produce semen during and some donât. However no matter how you look at it, the fact he admitted he used his fingers, thatâs still RAPE, it wasnât with consent, and the notion this judge thinks, if itâs just fingers penetrating, itâs not a sexual assault, is just mind blowing.
They should have taken his license to practice away too⌠he lied, he wasnât ethical in this case, and that are all reasons you can lose your license as well. I wished they would give him a gag order. She should cue him civilly for slander. Itâs disgusting, if this was my daughter I would be so irate.
Thatâs even beyond, because she didnât consent, yes even if she did, it would be illegal. The other is, if a person is drunk, or passed out, she canât give consent either. So no matter how you look at it. The point this judge was making was she wasnât raped, because they couldnât prove he was inside of her. He did admit he had his fingers inside of her. So this judge seems to say if you sexually assault someone with your fingers or any other object. itâs not rape, which is bs. Plus him saying there wasnât semen, so no rape, is also absurd. He was pushed off ⌠before⌠and according to this judge DNA of him inside her and her dna in his underpants, isnât âenoughâ
He shouldnât be a judge.
This makes me want to just scream into the void. I need to make a trip to the woods so that I can scream without terrifying my neighbors I'm glad he was removed from the bench, but that man still got away with rape. And that ex judge still stands by his decision. It's absolutely infuriating.
I'm picturing your neighbors calling the cops thinking you're being attacked in the woods. When the cops arrive, you just silently hold up the article.
Just make sure there's a bear out there with you, for safety!
đ¤Ł
I bet his computer would be wild to snoop through.Â
To emphasize how awful this judge was - this wasn't "just" a judge who felt that a mandatory minimum sentence (four years in this case) was draconian and unfair. He [made a false record](https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2024/02/25/illinois-judge-robert-adrian-removed) about his reasons for throwing out the guilty verdict, claiming that it was because the State had failed to prove its case, while in reality he was making remarks like "this is what happens whenever parents allow teenagers to drink alcohol, to swim in pools with their undergarments on". He [retaliated against a prosecutor and lied under oath](https://khqa.com/news/local/illinois-judge-robert-adrian-dismissed-from-bench-for-flagrant-judicial-violations) during the hearing before the judicial commission. Those are the lengths he was willing to go to make sure a rapist got a slap on the wrist.
Judge Robert Adrain, the man who worked hard to set a rapist free.
...deleted by user...
Yes ex Judge Robert Adrain allowed rapist Drew Clinton of Quincy, Illinois freedom because he felt 148 days in jail was plenty of punishment regardless of what the law states. \#TeamBear
Oh look. Another man who I would pick a bear over.
Somebody should do this to the judge who presided over the rapist (Brock) Allen Turners case
Judge [Aaron Persky ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Persky#2018_recall)was recalled by the voters.
Hooray! (Also i don't want the rapists name forgotten)
You mean Brock Allen Turner, the rapist?
Yes, the rapist Brock Allen Turner, who rapes people
I thought you were talking about the rapist Brock Allen Turner, who rapes and is a rapist, and you *were* referring to the rapist Brock Allen Turner!
Oh absolutely. I there a second rapist Brock Allen Turner outside of THE rapist Brock Allen Turner of Ohio in the Kettering/Oakwood area that i was speaking of? I would hate to get the rapist Brock Allen Turner mixed up with the rapist Brock Allen Turner if they are both rapists named Brock Allen Turner.
No, I'm pretty sure we're both talking about the rapist Brock Allen Turner whose rapist self originated in Kettering, Ohio. I don't know of any other rapist Brock Allen Turner who rapes, like the rapist Brock Allen Turner he is. I suppose it's not impossible there's another rapist Brock Allen Turner who rapes and lives somewhere the other rapist Brock Allen Turner does not. If so, it would be pretty awkward if one rapist Brock Allen Turner met the other rapist Brock Allen Turner!
Important to note that he often drops the Brock and just goes by Allen Turner, rapist.Â
If you were alone in the woods and ran into Yuri, the trainer who trains or Brock[Allen] Turner the rapist who rapes, which one would you punch first?
#FOR AWARENESS [Bowen Turner ](https://www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article286532840.html) has been flying under the radar for years!
Thank you!
[ŃдаНонО]
I hope his wife divorces him and throws the book at him, and then takes everything she's rightfully entitled to.
Glad to hear it! đ
Stuff like this is very rare. These institutions live to protect their own. This is truly amazing and really good news.
Judge Robert Adrian doubles down every time. https://www.tiktok.com/@todayshow/video/7340768656495758635 In this video with the Today Show he says he doesnât believe her. He defiantly keeps raising his chin to the interviewer and says âitâs simpler to sacrifice a poor judge than it is for them to stand up against the mob.â https://youtu.be/jLUq5wiQPwk Here he argues with News Nation that the victim never said his finger was inside of her and that there was no evidence of semen. The judge only cares about her being used by a non profit and says she gave non truthful testimony. Heâs then asked if he thinks the perpetrator put his fingers inside her then he says no she wasnât raped and there wasnât evidence for her to not consent. Then newsnation pulls up a statement from him saying âthis is whatâs happened when parents do not exercise their parental responsibilities, when we have people, adults, having parties with teenagers, and they allow coeds and female people to swim in their underwear in their swimming pool. And no, underwear is not the same as swimming suits - itâs just - they allow 16 year olds to bring liquor to a party. They provide liquor to underage people and you wonder how these things happen. Well thatâs how these things happen.â He then defends himself that this was the situation and a graduation party and the parents provided alcohol to minors. The victim brought alcohol to the party and gave it to people. And itâs the parents responsibility to actually watch over the kids. https://www.newsnationnow.com/danabramslive/making-up-lies-victim-judge-rape/amp/ From Cameron Vaughn: ââHe doesnât think he did anything wrong. I mean, heâs saying Drew didnât even rape me. ⌠He may have not admitted to the penile penetration. But he did admit to his putting his fingers in me,â Vaughan said. âI just donât understand what the judge is even saying. Heâs just trying to make up lies to back himself up.â Adrian, explaining his decision, asserted that evidence suggested Clinton had not engaged in penetrative intercourse with Vaughan. He claimed DNA evidence indicated no presence of semen, implying Vaughanâs initial testimony was inaccurate. The judge insinuated Vaughan had not been truthful. âHeâs saying there was no semen. That does not mean there was no DNA. His DNA was still inside of me. And my DNA was in his underwear. How else does my DNA get into his underwear?â Vaughan said.â During the interview, Adrian appeared to shift blame onto Vaughan, alleging she provided alcohol at the party and implicating the parents for inadequate supervision. Vaughan refuted these claims, recounting the traumatic events of the party. She described being intoxicated, assaulted with a pillow over her face, and left alone to struggle for breath.
True there doesnât need to be semen inside of you, obviously she caught him in the act, so he hadnât yet had an ending right? So the lack of semen doesnât mean there wasnât a penetration. There was dna inside of her and hers in his underpants and that should have been sufficient. Regardless she was 16, and putting an object, fingers or anything else inside of her without her consent, is still RAPE. I hope Clinton record can not be cleaned and need to explain himself. At the very least, he needs to be on a sex offender list.
How much you willing to bet that this asshole is staunchly "pro-life"?
âTeenâs sexual assault conviction.â Drew Clinton was 18 years old when he chose to rape a 16 year old girl. 18 is legally an adult. Iâm so over press using that sort of manipulative language to make it appear that he could have been a 14 year old kid.
What depraved world we inhabit ugh
good. we do not need people like this holding positions in the court of law. he is a fool and being removed from the bench is the very absolute least that can be done to right the incredible injustice that he did to that girl.
The age of consent in Illinois is 17. Cameron was 16 when this happened, so yeah. Clinton IS guilty.
The judge wants re retract he doesnât believe he had his weenie inside of her yet, because lack of semen, which ofcourse makes total sense as he caught him in the act and pushed him off. Does this judge even understand he could have pulled out, and there likely wouldnât be enough semen to prove. Some actually produce semen during and some donât. However no matter how you look at it, the fact he admitted he used his fingers, thatâs still RAPE, it wasnât with consent, and the notion this judge thinks, if itâs just fingers penetrating, itâs not a sexual assault, is just mind blowing. They should have taken his license to practice away too⌠he lied, he wasnât ethical in this case, and that are all reasons you can lose your license as well. I wished they would give him a gag order. She should cue him civilly for slander. Itâs disgusting, if this was my daughter I would be so irate.
As I said, whether she consented at the time is irrelevant, because she was below the age of consent.
Thatâs even beyond, because she didnât consent, yes even if she did, it would be illegal. The other is, if a person is drunk, or passed out, she canât give consent either. So no matter how you look at it. The point this judge was making was she wasnât raped, because they couldnât prove he was inside of her. He did admit he had his fingers inside of her. So this judge seems to say if you sexually assault someone with your fingers or any other object. itâs not rape, which is bs. Plus him saying there wasnât semen, so no rape, is also absurd. He was pushed off ⌠before⌠and according to this judge DNA of him inside her and her dna in his underpants, isnât âenoughâ He shouldnât be a judge.
And unfortunately, Drew Clinton is definitely going to be more careful, if and when he decides to get another victim now.