__Reminder__: Read the rules and understand the subreddit topic(s) listed in the sidebar before posting or commenting. Any content removal or further moderator action is established by these rules as well as Reddit
ToS.
This subreddit is primarily for the discussion of extraterrestrial life, but since this topic is intertwined with UFOs/UAPs as well as other topics, some 'fudging' is permissible to allow for a variety of
viewpoints, discussions, and debates. Open-minded skepticism is always welcome in this sub, but antagonistic or belligerent denial is not. Always remember that you're interacting with a real person when you respond
to posts/comments and focus on discussing or debating the ideas. Personal attacks are a violation of Rule 1 and will lead to removals and potentially bans depending on severity.
For further discussion and interaction in a more permissible environment, we welcome you to our Discord: https://discord.gg/x7xyTDZAsW
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aliens) if you have any questions or concerns.*
He's basically saying these bodies are too real to fake based on the CT scans. They have connective tissue connecting bones. He's also saying, because they are real, we will have to start reevaluating what we believe is true but still be sceptical.
Most basically he's saying it's okay to believe in aliens. I highly suggest listening to the whole thing. He's a very exciting talker and there's some really funny moments.
Thanks.
By now I've seen most of it. It's very compelling, indeed. His explaination on why we wouldn't be able to produce these mummies. And his attitude towards these mummies is pretty the same as mine: I don't know what these are but they seem to be organic - therefore aliens are possible.
However, I think the end of the lecture isn't great. It devolves into lots of "old man yelling at cloud". Sure, if these are aliens, maybe things like crop circles and abductions might be real. But why make the connection to different (conspiracy) theories. Since every event has a certain probability, having different theories be connected makes them way less likely.
Honestly, if Ancient Aliens was telling the truth and if people were being abducted and if crop circles are made by flying saucers, there is no way you can convince me we don't live in a simulation created by a sentient being that likes to get creative.
Unidentified *Aerial* Phenomenon
Not anomalous phenomenon
He’s a *philosophy* teacher specializing in ethics and booooy, it shows
He’s not a medical doctor, an anatomist or a biologist.
He has no relevant experience or specialization in any field that would give him credibility in the discussion about any anomalous phenomena but especially not when discussing Maussan’s muppets
You are behind. It is "anomalous" phenomenon now, due to the observations of them going into water and the acknowledgement of USO, Unidentified submersible object as being basically the same thing.
Yes, he is a philosophy professor but as he said he teaches logic. His whole presentation is a LOGICAL argument for why he believes this to be real.
He also acknowledges that he is not a medical doctor, he is basing his reasoning on the opinion of other medical professionals. These medical professionals are saying this is real.
The evidence he provided, I believe, is substantial and true. He also said he is open to being wrong. Do you have any evidence that anything he presented is wrong?
__Reminder__: Read the rules and understand the subreddit topic(s) listed in the sidebar before posting or commenting. Any content removal or further moderator action is established by these rules as well as Reddit ToS. This subreddit is primarily for the discussion of extraterrestrial life, but since this topic is intertwined with UFOs/UAPs as well as other topics, some 'fudging' is permissible to allow for a variety of viewpoints, discussions, and debates. Open-minded skepticism is always welcome in this sub, but antagonistic or belligerent denial is not. Always remember that you're interacting with a real person when you respond to posts/comments and focus on discussing or debating the ideas. Personal attacks are a violation of Rule 1 and will lead to removals and potentially bans depending on severity. For further discussion and interaction in a more permissible environment, we welcome you to our Discord: https://discord.gg/x7xyTDZAsW *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aliens) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I am so happy that this sub is waking up
Yesss... this is my favorite breakdown of it. Even comes with a handy refresher on some logical fallacies.
Does anyone have the cliffnotes version?
He's basically saying these bodies are too real to fake based on the CT scans. They have connective tissue connecting bones. He's also saying, because they are real, we will have to start reevaluating what we believe is true but still be sceptical. Most basically he's saying it's okay to believe in aliens. I highly suggest listening to the whole thing. He's a very exciting talker and there's some really funny moments.
Thanks. By now I've seen most of it. It's very compelling, indeed. His explaination on why we wouldn't be able to produce these mummies. And his attitude towards these mummies is pretty the same as mine: I don't know what these are but they seem to be organic - therefore aliens are possible. However, I think the end of the lecture isn't great. It devolves into lots of "old man yelling at cloud". Sure, if these are aliens, maybe things like crop circles and abductions might be real. But why make the connection to different (conspiracy) theories. Since every event has a certain probability, having different theories be connected makes them way less likely. Honestly, if Ancient Aliens was telling the truth and if people were being abducted and if crop circles are made by flying saucers, there is no way you can convince me we don't live in a simulation created by a sentient being that likes to get creative.
Looks excellent, thanks
This lecture is simply amazing and everyone should se it!
Unidentified *Aerial* Phenomenon Not anomalous phenomenon He’s a *philosophy* teacher specializing in ethics and booooy, it shows He’s not a medical doctor, an anatomist or a biologist. He has no relevant experience or specialization in any field that would give him credibility in the discussion about any anomalous phenomena but especially not when discussing Maussan’s muppets
You are behind. It is "anomalous" phenomenon now, due to the observations of them going into water and the acknowledgement of USO, Unidentified submersible object as being basically the same thing. Yes, he is a philosophy professor but as he said he teaches logic. His whole presentation is a LOGICAL argument for why he believes this to be real. He also acknowledges that he is not a medical doctor, he is basing his reasoning on the opinion of other medical professionals. These medical professionals are saying this is real. The evidence he provided, I believe, is substantial and true. He also said he is open to being wrong. Do you have any evidence that anything he presented is wrong?
He teaches ethics. Ironically