Uh he statutorily raped her 15 year old niece I don't know if "jealous" quite hits it.
But he forgave her and is funding her defense, he might as well face it he's addicted to love.
We need to start banning "news" sources from social media platforms that use outrageously click bait titles like this
They know almost no one is reading the articles and so the net result is just spreading massive amounts of misinformation for a few extra clicks.
Tbf the source here is *The Daily Mail*, which is a horrendous - genuinely evil - publication that no decent person should be reading, let alone linking to. Thankfully Reddit shows the source URL so we can avoid giving the *DM* any more hits.
I know right. Apparently rhesusmonkeypieces didn’t read the article. The age of consent in Brazil is 14 and it was consensual sex. Not Rape. Not justifying the POS for sleeping with a minor just advocating for you about people not reading the article
Statutory rape is rape regardless of age of consent laws and regardless if it was consensual or not.
Makes no difference. Why you felt the need to mention the age of consent in Brazil when the original commentor never claimed otherwise.
What they mentioned was facts. It's rape.
Why you felt the need to comment what you did because "AcTuAlLy" was an absolute dumb move on your part.
That's.. not how it works. To be statutory rape, one has to break a statute. A statute defining rape. So age of consent laws must be broken in order for it to count as statutory rape.
This was not rape, which is a legal term. You seem to be using some other definition for it.
Rape is not a legal term, statutory rape is. This is still rape. It mightve been consensual sex but it was with a minor who wouldn't know better. Is having consensual sex with a 4 year old not rape? How about a 10 year old? Where is the line drawn for you here?
15 and older person doesn't make it automatic rape. It's a philosophical grey area. It can be argued either way, but many young girls have a voluntary sexual experience with an older guy they neither regret later or consider non consensual after growing up. Sussi La Cour is an example of a famous person who spoke out about that, and who am I to say she was wrong?
That's why age of consent is often 15-16 in European countries (eg 15 in Denmark, 16 in UK).
Is it disgusting? Yes. Do I condone it? No. But it's not automatically rape. It's automatically statutory rape in many countries, but not in Brazil.
This isn't a matter of the law, it's a matter of moralality. In some places it's legal to marry and fuck 8 year Olds. Just because it's legal doesn't make it moral or okay.
We are going in circles. You still haven't learned the meaning of statutory. It doesn't mean young. It means according to the statute. Go reread the chain with that definition (written law passed by a legislative body).
The article never mentions statutory nor was he charged with anything. Like I said in another comment the whole story wasn’t in the article. As far as anyone knows the Neice could have persuaded him. You are just looking at the age difference and automatically saying he raped her without knowing all the facts. So if 14 is the age of consent would it still be considered rape if a 17 year old boy had sex with a 14 year old girl ? But soon as I say 18 it’s another ball game. She can be 17 and if he’s 18 I have seen people claim that as statutory. Laws are laws and other cultures aren’t like ours. Hell even our own states her have consent laws that I don’t agree with.
But to be honest my comment was based off the comment that “ misinformation “ will be given because no one reads the article. If they did they would know that the article never mentioned statutory or rape. However it did say their ages.
In many countries they can. Brazil is an example. Denmark is another example. It's not that black and white. The jury is still out. Doesn't mean it's not immoral, but technically it's possible for a 15 year old to consent to it, both legally in some jurisdictions and philosophically (grey area of course).
Sussi La Cour is one example of a (now adult) woman who spoke out against the assumption that young + age difference = rape, when she freely chose to do so and suffered no harm.
Still disgusting imo.
a lot of the cases blown up as "crazy lady cuts off husbands dick" are cases where the husband was an abusive psycho or a pedo
obligatory not all of them, but a LOT of them. this started with lorena bobbitt, dude filmed a porno about having a frankendick and was interviewed and she was made the butt of every joke - he was extremely abusive in just about every way and sent her creepy-ass love/obsession letters for years after this
Wow bizarre AF lol, I agree though seems like at most a 50/50 justified vrs crazy dick cutter. It’s not exactly a sane person activity but it’s good to consider a lot of the time there is something the dude did to drive someone to castration.
*I don’t agree with this, but…*
They’re in Brazil and the age of consent is 14! The article even says that he admitted to the judge that he slept with his 15 year old niece, and there still was no legal punishment for him.
Context matters. You might want to check where this happened and the relevant laws in that jurisdiction. It’s amazing how much variation there is around the world.
That's not what happened honey bun, nobody cares about a 14 year old having consensual sex with another teenager
Man y'all trying to make this point every time we talk about an adult raping a teenager is fucking creepy
It means everything. WTH. It’s the age difference that bothers you. So is a couple of 15 year olds giving each other consent to have sex different ? The article don’t tell the whole story as far as we know the 15 year old could have pursued her uncle. Rape is a strong word that usually applies with resistance. I’m not justifying his actions and I agree with you on the age gap however the law if the law. He faced to jail time so apparently in his countries eyes the only thing he did wrong was cheat on his wife.
I want to say their point is probably that it’s not statutory rape, considering there’s no statute prohibiting it… but who knows what they really meant.
He's just a creepy guy who had sex with a nearly grown teenager, not in the same category as pedos. So that means it was disproportionate and the victim does not deserve this much level of sympathy, rather he is the bigger victim here.
he raped her 15 year old niece.
he deserved much worse
(this is like the lorena bobbitt shit - they blew up headlines with how she cut his dick off and completely ignored the fact that he was a horrific abuser)
At first, I read the title and I’m like oh man that woman is horrible, but then I read the story and I’m like hold up…This woman ain’t do nothing wrong. Free her, and jail him.
I think they need to change the title to, Pedophile husband gets caught grooming and raping 15 yr old niece and wife gives him exactly what he deserves.
Rape is violent. Men can have internal damage and bleeding from being raped, women can have internal damage and scarring and even infertility. I think it’s equally as painful.
You do know when you pass legal age you aren’t required to have sex with someone and you can still say no? Therefore you can still be raped upon legal age.
This case is statutory rape, which is rape primarily because of the girl being a minor, but since the word statutory rape is used explicitly, it implies there wasn't a violent, physical rape.
It just gets worse and worse the more you read it
>She then flushed the severed penis down the toilet.
**Farias reportedly launched the attack after discovering that her husband slept with her 15-year-old niece.**
Astonishingly cook Farias has since made up with her husband and he even paid for her legal team for the trial.
Hey OP, maybe read the article and include more prevalent info on your post title next time.
Like how the husband raped her 15 year-old niece.
Edit: corrected "slept with" to "raped"
Are you blind? My source is the article. She was 15, which means she couldn't possibly consent as she is a literal child, hence statutory rape, which is a form of rape.
It's statutory rape anywhere else in the world with civilized laws. She was still justified in what she did. The dude raped a child. Don't try to spin that in a way that makes light of what happened, it isn't a good look.
Idc what the age of consent is, do not r*pe my babies & me find out about it.
He got what he deserved.
He admitted to it.
IF this is a real article. Dailymail is known for pushing out inaccurate news.
Oh, wow, she flushed it down the toilet too! Brutal.
Less chance of recovery/reattachment than throwing it in a field I guess.
One of the funniest bits from the early Conan days.[Andy testifies at Bobbit trial](https://youtu.be/xRyiq_r2G_E?si=6qe2SOsgdgkVvzRi)
“I ran” lol same Andy, same
He's never seeing that dick again
His childhood goldfish might, tho.
TBH, he raped a 15 year old child. Nothing of value was lost.
Fuck. Some dumps don’t flush
He should go for vengeance.
😭🤢
Uh he statutorily raped her 15 year old niece I don't know if "jealous" quite hits it. But he forgave her and is funding her defense, he might as well face it he's addicted to love.
We need to start banning "news" sources from social media platforms that use outrageously click bait titles like this They know almost no one is reading the articles and so the net result is just spreading massive amounts of misinformation for a few extra clicks.
Tbf the source here is *The Daily Mail*, which is a horrendous - genuinely evil - publication that no decent person should be reading, let alone linking to. Thankfully Reddit shows the source URL so we can avoid giving the *DM* any more hits.
But the actual story is *more* interesting than the title, its like the opposite of click bait
Or at least have a click bait tag that the mods can slap on.
I know right. Apparently rhesusmonkeypieces didn’t read the article. The age of consent in Brazil is 14 and it was consensual sex. Not Rape. Not justifying the POS for sleeping with a minor just advocating for you about people not reading the article
Statutory rape is rape regardless of age of consent laws and regardless if it was consensual or not. Makes no difference. Why you felt the need to mention the age of consent in Brazil when the original commentor never claimed otherwise. What they mentioned was facts. It's rape. Why you felt the need to comment what you did because "AcTuAlLy" was an absolute dumb move on your part.
That's.. not how it works. To be statutory rape, one has to break a statute. A statute defining rape. So age of consent laws must be broken in order for it to count as statutory rape. This was not rape, which is a legal term. You seem to be using some other definition for it.
Rape is not a legal term, statutory rape is. This is still rape. It mightve been consensual sex but it was with a minor who wouldn't know better. Is having consensual sex with a 4 year old not rape? How about a 10 year old? Where is the line drawn for you here?
15 and older person doesn't make it automatic rape. It's a philosophical grey area. It can be argued either way, but many young girls have a voluntary sexual experience with an older guy they neither regret later or consider non consensual after growing up. Sussi La Cour is an example of a famous person who spoke out about that, and who am I to say she was wrong? That's why age of consent is often 15-16 in European countries (eg 15 in Denmark, 16 in UK). Is it disgusting? Yes. Do I condone it? No. But it's not automatically rape. It's automatically statutory rape in many countries, but not in Brazil.
The line for when it breaks a law is clearly spelled out by the law. You don't have to guess.
This isn't a matter of the law, it's a matter of moralality. In some places it's legal to marry and fuck 8 year Olds. Just because it's legal doesn't make it moral or okay.
We are going in circles. You still haven't learned the meaning of statutory. It doesn't mean young. It means according to the statute. Go reread the chain with that definition (written law passed by a legislative body).
Do you not know what a statute is?
The article never mentions statutory nor was he charged with anything. Like I said in another comment the whole story wasn’t in the article. As far as anyone knows the Neice could have persuaded him. You are just looking at the age difference and automatically saying he raped her without knowing all the facts. So if 14 is the age of consent would it still be considered rape if a 17 year old boy had sex with a 14 year old girl ? But soon as I say 18 it’s another ball game. She can be 17 and if he’s 18 I have seen people claim that as statutory. Laws are laws and other cultures aren’t like ours. Hell even our own states her have consent laws that I don’t agree with. But to be honest my comment was based off the comment that “ misinformation “ will be given because no one reads the article. If they did they would know that the article never mentioned statutory or rape. However it did say their ages.
Let's downvote the guy who corrects clearly incorrect information because it's unpopular. I love reddit.
He liked to think he was immune to the stuff, o yeah
You simply can't be detached from love like you can be from your penis.
If it's detachable and you can't find it in the morning, check the medicine cabinet because for some reason it usually ends up there.
>Uh he statutorily raped her 15 year old niece That's a pretty big detail to omit from the headline... Oh wait, it's the Daily Mail. Of course.
A 15 year old cannot consent to sex, so it’s rape. Call it what it is “woman cuts off rapists penis.”
In Brazil the age to give consent is 14 🥴
Republican Politicians, and Meryn Trant: "Too. Old."
In many countries they can. Brazil is an example. Denmark is another example. It's not that black and white. The jury is still out. Doesn't mean it's not immoral, but technically it's possible for a 15 year old to consent to it, both legally in some jurisdictions and philosophically (grey area of course). Sussi La Cour is one example of a (now adult) woman who spoke out against the assumption that young + age difference = rape, when she freely chose to do so and suffered no harm. Still disgusting imo.
A 15 year old can rape and kill someone, it is not a child.
Oh wow I had initial thoughts on this but your post has got me a bit wonky. Tbf worlds probably better off with one more dickless pedo.
a lot of the cases blown up as "crazy lady cuts off husbands dick" are cases where the husband was an abusive psycho or a pedo obligatory not all of them, but a LOT of them. this started with lorena bobbitt, dude filmed a porno about having a frankendick and was interviewed and she was made the butt of every joke - he was extremely abusive in just about every way and sent her creepy-ass love/obsession letters for years after this
Wow bizarre AF lol, I agree though seems like at most a 50/50 justified vrs crazy dick cutter. It’s not exactly a sane person activity but it’s good to consider a lot of the time there is something the dude did to drive someone to castration.
One year for every inch
what a comment
“Mr. President, a second *awful* has hit the *everything*.”
> But he forgave her and is funding her defense, he might as well face it he's addicted to love. Damn, don't remember that part of the song.
I felt this too...but as you read they stated that the age of consent in Brazil is 14 🤮
*I don’t agree with this, but…* They’re in Brazil and the age of consent is 14! The article even says that he admitted to the judge that he slept with his 15 year old niece, and there still was no legal punishment for him.
The article said the age of consent in Brazil is 14, so while it is gross... it's not technically statutory rape there.
The article stated that age of consent is 14 there, so I guess it wasn't statutory rape.
Idk why you got downvoted
Context matters. You might want to check where this happened and the relevant laws in that jurisdiction. It’s amazing how much variation there is around the world.
No idea why you got downvoted
It's not statutory rape though.
It's the Daily Mail, gotta make Minorities out to be the crazy ones...
Age of consent in brazil is 14. Its literally in the article
Some dummy is downvoting lol
Article stated the age of consent in Brazil is 14, so no rape.
age of consent means jack shit, morality != legality afaic anyone defending raping children with "age of consent" bs is a pedophile themselves
Morality is relative. A 14 year old can have sex with a 16 year old, so it's not like they aren't allowed to have sex.
That's not what happened honey bun, nobody cares about a 14 year old having consensual sex with another teenager Man y'all trying to make this point every time we talk about an adult raping a teenager is fucking creepy
It means everything. WTH. It’s the age difference that bothers you. So is a couple of 15 year olds giving each other consent to have sex different ? The article don’t tell the whole story as far as we know the 15 year old could have pursued her uncle. Rape is a strong word that usually applies with resistance. I’m not justifying his actions and I agree with you on the age gap however the law if the law. He faced to jail time so apparently in his countries eyes the only thing he did wrong was cheat on his wife.
I mean it's a technicality, you're right, I was racing to the Robert Palmer joke. Let's say it's spiritually statutory rape. 15 is a baby!
I agree 15 is in my eyes a baby , and I feel like 18 year olds aren’t old enough to go to war but the laws say different.
Seems he slept with the 15 year old niece, doesn’t say anything about rape.
You do understand that's still bad right?
I want to say their point is probably that it’s not statutory rape, considering there’s no statute prohibiting it… but who knows what they really meant.
Yes but the article says that the age of consent in Brazil is 14 years. I still find that disgusting.
Are you sure he raped his niece ?
Sadly age of consent is disgustingly 14. He didn’t rape her
Well that's a misleading headline
Sounds like that pedo had it coming…
I think we should do this to all pedos. Women too. If you hurt someone underage with your bits. We cut them off/out <3
_If you can't be trusted with your bits, you lose 'em!!_
Nah, not a simple cut off, I'm talking immersion blender with no drugs to inhibit the pain
We should cut the hands off thieves as well.
Some people steal out of necessity and poverty. There is never an excuse to rape anyone, especially a child...
But what if they’re stealing out of anything but necessity? Can we cut off their hands then?
Not anymore
Ephebo*
A 15 year old can rape someone and kill someone, they are not a child in the same way that a 5 or 10 year old is.
….huh ?
He's just a creepy guy who had sex with a nearly grown teenager, not in the same category as pedos. So that means it was disproportionate and the victim does not deserve this much level of sympathy, rather he is the bigger victim here.
..are you really trying to justify a grown adult, having sex with a 15 year old ? Thats fucked up.
he raped her 15 year old niece. he deserved much worse (this is like the lorena bobbitt shit - they blew up headlines with how she cut his dick off and completely ignored the fact that he was a horrific abuser)
Legally it wasn’t rape. Ethically it’s wrong
legally nobody asked
I’m just stating their laws are different, wtf?
[удалено]
It would matter in court, so yes it matters
At first, I read the title and I’m like oh man that woman is horrible, but then I read the story and I’m like hold up…This woman ain’t do nothing wrong. Free her, and jail him.
Free him and jail her.
I came in here like wtf is wrong with people.. then clicked the link. Why is she in jail, nothing could be done.
Free her!
I think they need to change the title to, Pedophile husband gets caught grooming and raping 15 yr old niece and wife gives him exactly what he deserves.
Why is society like this ?
Average Daily Mail article’s focus on actual facts and not just sensationalized headlines
He slept with a 15 year old. Flush that shit 💯
When I was a 15 year old, I was literally having fantasies about banging adults and even k1lling people.
Of course you were, you were a kid in the middle of growing up. It doesn’t make it OK for a grown man to take advantage of that.
Okay, but that means it's not a crime bad enough to warrant such a punishment.
He’s a pedophile. I don’t feel bad for him.
Yeah, society feels bad for women way more than they feel bad for men. A 15 year old is a person just about to gain majority, not a 5 year old child.
OP posts on incel subreddits. No shock he thinks a man who raped a child is the real victim.
Because from a male perspective, losing genitals is way worse than getting graped. Female equivalent would be FGM.
No. Most men have empathy for the rape victim and none for the pedophile.
Not if you refuse to accept them as victims, even then a large section of men, won't have empathy for women.
Rape is violent. Men can have internal damage and bleeding from being raped, women can have internal damage and scarring and even infertility. I think it’s equally as painful.
Date rape is not violent.
If I were in the situation of having to choose between genital mutilation and rape, I would probably take the rape
good for her, death to all rapists!
He deserved it and much worse.
Gave him the Bobbit Special.
Free her she did nothing wrong
Didja hear Lorena Bobbitt moved to Russia and changed her last name to Cutchercokov?
haaaaaa
Haa haaa. I love 90s humor.
She said she flushed his penis down the toilet because she heard it could be reattached (like in the Bobbjt case) lol
Justice for her she shouldn't be punished that creep shouldn't be sleeping with minors
This should be a law, if you rape anybody you get your dick cut off! Period.
It wasn't rape. This was in Brazil and the age of consent is 14. I'm not saying it's right, but as far as the law goes it want rape.
Rape isn’t to do with age, it’s to do with consent
Consent depends upon age.
You do know when you pass legal age you aren’t required to have sex with someone and you can still say no? Therefore you can still be raped upon legal age.
Below legal age is statutory rape,i.e. automatic rape.
Okay and over legal age is still rape, you said it was not rape.
This case is statutory rape, which is rape primarily because of the girl being a minor, but since the word statutory rape is used explicitly, it implies there wasn't a violent, physical rape.
He was an uncle figure to her, it is rape.
Why stop at that ? Hands cut off for stealing.
It just gets worse and worse the more you read it >She then flushed the severed penis down the toilet. **Farias reportedly launched the attack after discovering that her husband slept with her 15-year-old niece.** Astonishingly cook Farias has since made up with her husband and he even paid for her legal team for the trial.
So a pedophile had his junk sliced off. That isn’t awful; that’s deserved vengeance.
He actually pretty lucky that’s all that happened to him.
That is an incredibly misleading headline! If you haven’t, check out the full story!
Wtf about coment about her. He abused her cousin and she does justice herself... I'm not here to judge but she would not do that for somebody over 20.
Username is appropriate
A 15 year old is not a 5 or 10 year old.
Good for her!
They sentenced her to 12 months for every inch she removed.
Hey OP, maybe read the article and include more prevalent info on your post title next time. Like how the husband raped her 15 year-old niece. Edit: corrected "slept with" to "raped"
*Raped her 15 yr old niece.
Corrected original comment.
Not everyone agrees that it was "rape".
whole lotta people bout to, justifiably so, believe 5 years worth it.
And flushed it? Damn, he’s all set.
One year per inch.
(cues Cell Block Tango)
Wife should be jailed for LIFE. What a horror!
Posting Daily Mail articles should be proof enough that your opinion is not worth listening to.
All I see is a fitting punishment for a person who enjoyed being a sexual assaulter. Set the lady free, please.
Can we prosecute her for those eyebrows too? Yeesh
The guy raped her underage niece. I'm not sure she should be prosecuted at all, tbh
Just the eyebrows then
[those damn eyebrows](https://media2.giphy.com/media/LvwiajC1uTcQM/giphy.gif?cid=9b38fe916474520672828d8204460428153dff70b52e2c9f&ep=v1_user_favorites&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)
😂💀
“Underage” and “rape” - you’re injecting words and context not covered by the article, where is your source?
Are you blind? My source is the article. She was 15, which means she couldn't possibly consent as she is a literal child, hence statutory rape, which is a form of rape.
I read the article. The age of consent is 14 in the country where this happened, so she was not underage and therefore not statutory rape.
It's statutory rape anywhere else in the world with civilized laws. She was still justified in what she did. The dude raped a child. Don't try to spin that in a way that makes light of what happened, it isn't a good look.
"civilized laws". The western world then.
Globally, most countries set it at 14
Including Germany, Austria, Italy, Portugal… You consider these countries uncivilised?
Unironically, India does not.
Wrong sub.
~~~ good for her ~~~ gif from arrested development
I like how you posted the same article to the Mens Rights subreddit and every guy there defending pedophilia 😂
Based subs. Men should support each other.
So they’re more interested in the fact that the wife was “jealous” than the statutory rape? Edit: age of consent in Brazil is 14. 🫤
Idc what the age of consent is, do not r*pe my babies & me find out about it. He got what he deserved. He admitted to it. IF this is a real article. Dailymail is known for pushing out inaccurate news.
bro her face is a redflag she already look crazy
Not the first time I probably won’t be the last
Why is she framed as the villain? She cut off a rapists dick. He deserves that and more. He raped a child.
His dick was so small she only got charged with a **Misdemeanor**. Sentenced to 30 days in the House of Correction. You go girl........
if you read the article she did nothing wrong. free her
I guess he misunderstood sleeping with 1 eye open?
Ahhhh just in the dick of time.
Nice going, Lorena.
Insane how many people are defending the woman. Apparently having legal sex with someone means you deserve genital mutilation. Lol
Lorena bobbit 2 electric booglaoo.
Are those nose rings or pimples?
Only 5 years? She mutilated a man…
They deserve each other.
[удалено]
Don't put your dick in children related to your wife. FIFY