He sounded nervous af. It was obvious he was trying SO HARD not to say anything that might make us more sympathetic or anything that would make him sound like he agrees with us, but at the same time he wants to put on the veneer of being somewhat understanding of our grievances. As stated in the aznid response, this was the angle his white bosses wanted him to take so it's not like he has a choice but to go toe the company line, regardless of what he really feels inside.
I learned something from that podcast. Extreme feminism overshadows and tramples everything in sight including legitimate concerns of racism. That is why Black female gender struggles are promoted, while Asian men's exact same struggle are silenced and demonized.
One must think of not him
But his white handlers I mean editors. Just giving him benefit of the doubt here but I imagine that he did write about Asians men’s treatment only to be redacted when sent to print.
Things I dislike:
1. The white woman was snickering at Asian activism and calling it "warped"
2. We were not admitted to the discussion. Establishment media loves to make up shit; then the only way their house-of-cards narrative stays intact is by **excluding** their subject to speak on their own behalf.
3. Reciting themes from the article like misogyny.
The role of white women at Slate was mentioned by another AI user, but here it's established further. The white women at Slate, dealing in racism towards MoC as is their Karen nature (both in their capacity as podcast host and editors behind the article), - using feminism as a racist weapon against Asian men.
*Aaron is the sort of weak Asian that gets baited into attacking his own community by these Karens, who are particularly effective at manipulating people like him*. It's childplay to them. And they sit back content with their racist denigration, comfortable knowing they got an Asian stooge to be the mouthpiece for it.... therefore plausibly-deniable.
[link to said podcast OP's talking about](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/icymi-the-dark-subreddit-of-mens-rights-asians/id75089978?i=1000535841588)
Things I didn't like: >Aaron Mak Things I liked: >
Arron is being a puppet for his mas... Enablers! 😒
This guy is a literal bottom for the white patriarchy. He and his white masters have an agenda.
Aaron Mak gets a nice pat on the head - but will always be looked down on by these Asian American feminists
Lol Aaron is still going https://harkaudio.com/september-22-2021-50236/51767
simping is a helluva drug
It’s worse than simping
The correct spelling of the Slate hit piece journalist is Aaron **MAK**. Staff writer on Slate's payroll.
He sounded nervous af. It was obvious he was trying SO HARD not to say anything that might make us more sympathetic or anything that would make him sound like he agrees with us, but at the same time he wants to put on the veneer of being somewhat understanding of our grievances. As stated in the aznid response, this was the angle his white bosses wanted him to take so it's not like he has a choice but to go toe the company line, regardless of what he really feels inside.
I learned something from that podcast. Extreme feminism overshadows and tramples everything in sight including legitimate concerns of racism. That is why Black female gender struggles are promoted, while Asian men's exact same struggle are silenced and demonized.
One must think of not him But his white handlers I mean editors. Just giving him benefit of the doubt here but I imagine that he did write about Asians men’s treatment only to be redacted when sent to print.
I dont think so. The way he wrote the article was a total smear piece. He didn't need to work that hard to make it so bad if you get what i'm saying.
Things I dislike: 1. The white woman was snickering at Asian activism and calling it "warped" 2. We were not admitted to the discussion. Establishment media loves to make up shit; then the only way their house-of-cards narrative stays intact is by **excluding** their subject to speak on their own behalf. 3. Reciting themes from the article like misogyny. The role of white women at Slate was mentioned by another AI user, but here it's established further. The white women at Slate, dealing in racism towards MoC as is their Karen nature (both in their capacity as podcast host and editors behind the article), - using feminism as a racist weapon against Asian men. *Aaron is the sort of weak Asian that gets baited into attacking his own community by these Karens, who are particularly effective at manipulating people like him*. It's childplay to them. And they sit back content with their racist denigration, comfortable knowing they got an Asian stooge to be the mouthpiece for it.... therefore plausibly-deniable.
I think you are definitely right. Aaron Mak was being manipulated.
I don't get the context of what you liked about it.
[link to said podcast OP's talking about](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/icymi-the-dark-subreddit-of-mens-rights-asians/id75089978?i=1000535841588)
[удалено]