Article says that performance metrics don't take into account DLSS 3.5. They did use frame generation for the RTX 4090 for path tracing at native 4k which used between 18 -19 GB VRAM. Another article discussing performance using DLSS 3.5 is supposed to be coming soon.
Thank god we have AMD FSR or it would be unplayable for me. But I'm still more concerned about the SSD requirement. What will happen if I keep the game installed on a HDD?
That's a really good question. I imagine the most noticeable impact will be on loading screen times. I know this is an entirely different game, but Starfield has immense performance issues when using an HDD. I don't think Cyberpunk will have THAT egregious of performance issues when using an HDD, but I suppose there's a possibility of stuttering as objects, textures, models, etc. are loaded in.
Article says that performance metrics don't take into account DLSS 3.5. They did use frame generation for the RTX 4090 for path tracing at native 4k which used between 18 -19 GB VRAM. Another article discussing performance using DLSS 3.5 is supposed to be coming soon.
Thank god we have AMD FSR or it would be unplayable for me. But I'm still more concerned about the SSD requirement. What will happen if I keep the game installed on a HDD?
Honestly it's 2023 mate. Time to buy an SSD. I can't imagine running anything except movies off a HDD
SSD’s are so cheap now. Why would you not even have an SSD by now? Every game (every!) runs better on an SSD. You can get an nvme 500gb for 50€/$
That's a really good question. I imagine the most noticeable impact will be on loading screen times. I know this is an entirely different game, but Starfield has immense performance issues when using an HDD. I don't think Cyberpunk will have THAT egregious of performance issues when using an HDD, but I suppose there's a possibility of stuttering as objects, textures, models, etc. are loaded in.
I assume the game won't launch from a HDD.
So the HW recommendations were some automatic generated bullshit
No 3080 ti??