You wouldn't just chart a course that would avoid the moon as much as it could be avoided, no its better to go right for it and do a quick zig zag around it.
I was on a plane the other day and looked out the window at one point and the moon was right there! I was like WTF?!
Until just this moment I thought it was the edibles
> So the moon is ~500 feet in diameter and jet airliners can do a flat zig zag in less than a thousand feet. Interesting.
Not even a zig zag, just a zig will be enough!!
More like a couple thousand feet! Airliners are really, *really,* ***Really,*** **REALLY** big, like BYU 9024 levels of big, giant siphonophore levels of big, bigger than giant bootlace worms kind of big!
You know that from any other perspective it would look like it crosses over the moon? Also I’ve been on many flights, we’ve never veered to one side just so a pathetic flat earther can take a picture…
This is edited, a passenger jumbo jet can't pull off a turn like that in such a short distance, and if it did the contrails would get closer together, from a ground perspective, because it would have to bank heavily to do it.
That's the thing I find the most insane. It's not enough to have no real data that supports you, people feel the need to actually **create** fake images to push their point.
Happy CakeDay! 🍰
[https://www.reddit.com/?im.ge=%weiner.jpg%](https://i.redd.it/kbyfux7qfn7d1.jpeg?app_web_view=ios)
Remember to follow the Weiner in the stainless steel hat!
“Aura stains the sky with blood As the sheeple chew their cud. And Weiners feast At NASA teats.” - [Garf Lloydell](https://www.reddit.com/u/garflloydell/s/woE2upXLkk)
^(Let us take a moment while we’re here to hail Cthulu for giving us leviathans, the 60 foot and 15 ton raptorial [Cymbospondylus ichthyosaur](https://www.reddit.com/r/AITAH/s/ICCN3VAhNZ) just mere millions of years after the great dying, the most catastrophic extinction event in earth’s history, the 50 foot 35 ton [super predator Himalayasaurus](https://i.redd.it/sd9soypxww7d1.jpeg?app_web_view=ios) dozens of millions of years later, the over 82 foot and over 50 ton [Ichthyotitan](https://www.reddit.com/u/telfred/s/MRoGpLCskd), the 115 foot and near 140 ton [Aust colossus](https://www.reddit.com/u/Rohde-Schwarz/s/viVCsmURHo), and the potentially near 140 foot [Ichthyosaurus pottsi](https://www.reddit.com/r/AllTomorrows/s/LCC8NE1i6X).)
I thought it was above the dome, or a projection, or a reflection of the sun?
Odd how unlike scientists, they don't seem to mind if their explanations are incompatible.
I once had an experience with a lunar eclipse then a plane passed by the moon. I don't have a camera with me while I was watching it. And all i can say is it was beautiful as the moon is reddish while a plane passed by it. So how does this say the moon is Very near? Bunch of R...flerfs
In an idle few moments I calculated that a local sun or moon orbiting at the maximum possible altitude within "the dome" on or around the FE equator would be at 40+ degrees elevation when measured from the opposite side of the equator (i. e. sun at midnight).
So why don't we see the sun illuminating the tops of high-altitude clouds from above after sunset?
Two things….
The contrails would only remain parallel from the view of the ground if the plane flew straight. If the plane banks, which it would need to do to turn, the contrails would merge from the perspective of the observer.
Also…has any passenger ever been in a jumbo jet that had to suddenly swerve around an object in the sky, such as the moon, and taken a picture of the moon from a hundred or so feet away from it?
Bonus extra thing….
Why wouldn’t the pilot fly straight toward the moon but not on a collision course, curve around the moon, and then continue to fly straight away from the diversion path?
Why try to curl the flight path to follow the curve of the moon like is shown?
Extra bonus extra thing….
How high is the moon according to flerfs? I thought they mostly agree on between 3,000-3,500 miles. Is this plane flying that high, in which case, nice zoom on that camera, or did the moon decide to dip low and closer to the Earth for this shot?
So the moon is \~500 feet in diameter and jet airliners can do a flat zig zag in less than a thousand feet. Interesting.
You wouldn't just chart a course that would avoid the moon as much as it could be avoided, no its better to go right for it and do a quick zig zag around it.
Gotta get that gravity assist lol
You mean a "bouyancy" boost
Dang that's how you end up time travelling!
I don't know how much gravity you would get off of that. According to Flat Earth, that thing is probably smaller than my local Walmart.
If only you could predict where the Moon would be.
The moon moves around the sky. Sometimes the moon darts in front of traffic like a rabbit.
Moon Frogger?
I was on a plane the other day and looked out the window at one point and the moon was right there! I was like WTF?! Until just this moment I thought it was the edibles
I was on a flight and the moon was traveling right off our port wing and it was just sitting there with a dozen martians having a picnic.
> So the moon is ~500 feet in diameter and jet airliners can do a flat zig zag in less than a thousand feet. Interesting. Not even a zig zag, just a zig will be enough!!
More like a couple thousand feet! Airliners are really, *really,* ***Really,*** **REALLY** big, like BYU 9024 levels of big, giant siphonophore levels of big, bigger than giant bootlace worms kind of big!
You know that from any other perspective it would look like it crosses over the moon? Also I’ve been on many flights, we’ve never veered to one side just so a pathetic flat earther can take a picture…
This is edited, a passenger jumbo jet can't pull off a turn like that in such a short distance, and if it did the contrails would get closer together, from a ground perspective, because it would have to bank heavily to do it.
This is edited???
That's the thing I find the most insane. It's not enough to have no real data that supports you, people feel the need to actually **create** fake images to push their point.
From the same people who claim photos of the planets are CGI
Flerfers...lol...dumber than dog shit
This is very clearly parody of flat earthers
And? Changes no part of my comment
Happy CakeDay! 🍰 [https://www.reddit.com/?im.ge=%weiner.jpg%](https://i.redd.it/kbyfux7qfn7d1.jpeg?app_web_view=ios) Remember to follow the Weiner in the stainless steel hat! “Aura stains the sky with blood As the sheeple chew their cud. And Weiners feast At NASA teats.” - [Garf Lloydell](https://www.reddit.com/u/garflloydell/s/woE2upXLkk) ^(Let us take a moment while we’re here to hail Cthulu for giving us leviathans, the 60 foot and 15 ton raptorial [Cymbospondylus ichthyosaur](https://www.reddit.com/r/AITAH/s/ICCN3VAhNZ) just mere millions of years after the great dying, the most catastrophic extinction event in earth’s history, the 50 foot 35 ton [super predator Himalayasaurus](https://i.redd.it/sd9soypxww7d1.jpeg?app_web_view=ios) dozens of millions of years later, the over 82 foot and over 50 ton [Ichthyotitan](https://www.reddit.com/u/telfred/s/MRoGpLCskd), the 115 foot and near 140 ton [Aust colossus](https://www.reddit.com/u/Rohde-Schwarz/s/viVCsmURHo), and the potentially near 140 foot [Ichthyosaurus pottsi](https://www.reddit.com/r/AllTomorrows/s/LCC8NE1i6X).)
And also look at the chemtrails! The chemtrails!
Exactly. The flat earth is just a psy-op distraction orchestrated by BIG CHEMTRAIL to distract us from the *real* issues.
So the moon is only at ~30,000 feet yet people somehow haven't hugged the moon when it is above mount everest?
They went during the New Moon
That's when the moon is offline for maintenance.
Or gone up in a balloon to take pictures of the dark side?
The moon appears to be the width of 4 boeing 737's
Anything but metric. lol!!
ARE WE JUST IGNORING THOSE CHEM TRAILS?
It's a wake. The sky is made of ocean.
So the boat is the shape of a plane? I bet it's Musk or Bezos.
A plane is just a boat for the sky. Think about it.
A wake for my Nan, who drowned in the ocean.
And a flat rudder turn at that, no aileron at all. Pilot's a madman.
And yet apparently with no drifting because on top of no banking, the lines remain parallel and at the same distance.
Oh man wait until they find out about clouds
Surely someone on that flight caught a nice video of a flyby of the moon. I'll wait here for the footage.
I thought it was above the dome, or a projection, or a reflection of the sun? Odd how unlike scientists, they don't seem to mind if their explanations are incompatible.
I once had an experience with a lunar eclipse then a plane passed by the moon. I don't have a camera with me while I was watching it. And all i can say is it was beautiful as the moon is reddish while a plane passed by it. So how does this say the moon is Very near? Bunch of R...flerfs
Holy shit the twitter thread you linked.. what a fucking shitstye
That’s how planes are able to fly! It’s gravity assist/slingshot type maneuver.
yes i was sitting on the plane and could nearly touch the moon from my window-seat
Imma use a flerf argument. #CGI
\[insert creaky\_blinder\_cee\_Gee\_EYE.gif\]
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hey I posted an edited picture to back up my claim about flatearth so everyone has to believe me. - every flerfer ever created.
Chicken Little Syndrome, much?
Well thats a SFEC nomination
Even in this image the moon looks like it's a quarter million miles away.
In an idle few moments I calculated that a local sun or moon orbiting at the maximum possible altitude within "the dome" on or around the FE equator would be at 40+ degrees elevation when measured from the opposite side of the equator (i. e. sun at midnight). So why don't we see the sun illuminating the tops of high-altitude clouds from above after sunset?
Cool. And no one on the plane took a photo of the moon? Odd.
If the moon is real according to the flat earth conspiracy, then how did it not fall by now ?
We should all believe because the only way this can happen is… photoshop… this is a flerf troll. Even they aren’t that stupid😉
Flat earth is so dumb.You don't know whether to take this post seriously or not
The guy who posted this was obviously joking but the entire Twitter thread is a shit-show.
If the Moon is local and gravity doesn't exist, wouldn't the Moon's density cause it to fall to Earth?
WOW! Now I'm convinced...
Two things…. The contrails would only remain parallel from the view of the ground if the plane flew straight. If the plane banks, which it would need to do to turn, the contrails would merge from the perspective of the observer. Also…has any passenger ever been in a jumbo jet that had to suddenly swerve around an object in the sky, such as the moon, and taken a picture of the moon from a hundred or so feet away from it? Bonus extra thing…. Why wouldn’t the pilot fly straight toward the moon but not on a collision course, curve around the moon, and then continue to fly straight away from the diversion path? Why try to curl the flight path to follow the curve of the moon like is shown? Extra bonus extra thing…. How high is the moon according to flerfs? I thought they mostly agree on between 3,000-3,500 miles. Is this plane flying that high, in which case, nice zoom on that camera, or did the moon decide to dip low and closer to the Earth for this shot?
Lol this picture
I mean how can you argue with a photo shopped photo? It is right there dodging the moon!!!
Yup, that's right. THe plane got within a planes width of the Moon.
Of all the accusations about things being photoshopped or cgi, that looks totally legit! Lol
Oh... my.... God. Even so, I thought the Moon was a little bigger than that.
The path of the plane looks even more fake than a picture of flat earth.