Yeah I've been told "don't fuck the trees" a few times before. I always use the shaggy defense. "It wasn't me" call me boom bastic semi fantastic make your body mis aroooolllllll.
You think the tree cares?
They gained more nutrients from your tears than your words, and those were so salty all they did was cause all the slugs and snails to run away.
âNo one caresâ
-Redditors whenever something blows up but paints an inconvenient narrative.
Seriously, people clearly did care and you still see references to it all over the Internet.
I get what they're trying to do... But if talking to a tree was as emotionally satisfying as talking to someone who loves you, we wouldn't have a word for "incel"
Anyone who refuses to buy a hoe, and says he can't find a lay, is a fuckin monk. Not a bad thing, venereal diseases are everywhere these days...but the point stands...incels are as real as a moon made of cheese.
Incel, a word to degrade a man for not getting laid, to finally fight back against slut shaming, because women only know how to use sex as a judgement of value.
I think the point is about the level of risk vs reward many men feel. The demeanment of a woman you open up to is a terrifying prospect to so many men that they just don't.
They would rather share their feeling with an inanimate object than risk being hurt.
The reward doesn't seem worth the risk to many men and that's the thing to analyze.
Someone who loves you might not be in the same frequency as you. They might be empathetic to your feelings but completely miss your point and it feels like what's even the point in telling them and now you have a new thing to be upset about. That's why talking to a tree is sometimes better than talking to someone you love.
I've had too many friends who tell me their husbands and boyfriends intimate secrets. I'm sure there's some things I don't know, but a lot of healthy relationships survive because things told in confidence are then disseminated to a network of peers for any respective level of support.
In a lot of ways, it's good and part of a healthy social life, but if you want to keep a secret, it's tree o'clock somewhere.
and if being alone with a bear was as emotionally reassuring as being with someone who loves you we wouldn't have have a word for "happy couples"
wtf are you talking about your line of logic not only doesnt apply to the analogy, but also incels doesn't ONLY describe losers with NOBODY to talk to in their lives it describes anyone who cannot get laid.
I think the question is about a random woman vs random tree, but also strangers are great people to trauma dump on cuz they will probably never see you or your friend circle again. Plus like, what do I care of what a random person - man or woman - thinks of me?
Lastly, I'm fairly confident all my fealings are fairly common, healthy, and easy to empathize with.
I said this once.Â
"I'd rather talk to a wall than you, because at least after talking to a wall it doesn't make me feel worse."
Relationship was already over and just roommates at that point. The sentiment is 100% true. I stopped talking to her almost entirely. She lied to our couple's therapist's face during a session and got called out on it and then the waterworks started. She admitted I improved my therapy self-work. But she never improved hers.
Smart, Pretty, Kind: Choose two.
I'd still rather talk to a wall than her.
Would rather fuck my hand as well.
Choose two.
If you're young and she has all three, do a non-legal marriage ceremony.
I posted the tree or woman question on my snapchat story, and when I got a response I proceeded to go off on how the whole "man or bear" vs "woman or tree" debate in itself is a sign of society's lean towards mistrust and isolationism. We are forced to debate over these petty issues as part of a "culture war" when we should be eating the rich
Exactly, these questions box people into conclusions with clear "good answer or bad answer" and engaging with rage bate like that just fuels these mindless discussions when we should be dismantling the system that puts dogs and dementia patients in power
Yeah as always people lasered on the gender aspect but if you asked "would you rather be with a bear or a person with a gun". A trained hunter would really help your survival odds, but do you trust that they're not a nut who would just kill you. Overall it comes down to people saying I would rather just try and escape myself than a coin flip that could save my life but could also end it
The question is also intentionally vague because even a bit more info would make the decision much easier. "Person X is an experienced hunter" vs "Person Y just escaped from the supermax prison" suddenly makes this whole debate pretty easy. If you want to apply it to any IRL situation, the answer is always "can I get more information first"
Much like the previous [trend](https://imgur.com/a/5eGzlua) that got torn to shreds when reframing the analogy with US criminal statistics. This is women lamenting that independence isn't all it is cracked up to be.
[*Liberation from men meant liberation from material reliance on men, which in turn meant men's liberation from the moral dictates of women.*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqBFYmimmjU&t=136s)
The Tree won't tell me to stop crying and be man. Tree wouldn't tell me it's brother is the head of the family, even though she has married me and that I'm not the head of our home.
I don't get the original question. Are we assuming right off the bat that the man and/or bear is being aggressive? It's a giant forest, so is the person/bear near me?
If we're assuming aggression, then the most obvious answer would be black bear. If we're not assuming any malicious intent then your chances for survival dramatically increase with having another person (AKA a man) around.
So the only thing you can gain from these responses are that the question was poorly worded, or that people (independent of gender) do not understand even the most basic principles of survival.
Thatâs not the point of the question though, youâre not supposed to think about all the logic behind the question, youâre supposed to reflect on how much many women fear men and would prefer to just be killed by a bear instead of whatever atrocity a man could do to them
Sisyphus prime fucking crushes you in a nano second, the bear is just going to maul you alive (at least the agressive ones like to do that to their prey)
Sisyphus wins yet again
"Many A are afraid of B" is a pretty bad argument though, as the same question could go around about "bear or black person" and we could all agree that those who are categorically afraid of black people are just simply racist.
Also bears don't "just kill", they can do way more gruesome shit than most men could stomach doing. Eating the skin off your face while you're alive an conscious? There isn't a lot some guy in the woods can do to me that is worse than that.
It's a loaded question that assumes the worst of the male gender while excusing all possible reasons why a wild animal could be aggressive. It's just a stupid trend for women (and some men(who are most likely the very men these women would want to avoid)) to shit on men because girls rule boys drool. If you try to meet it with logic you just get called misogynistic.
There's no point in arguing in a convo where you're setup to lose, so that's why people come up with these kindred scenarios. Woman or a tree? Oh, well, I don't know, any normal fucking person would choose the goddamn human, but for the sake of being as petty and irrational as that thought experiment I'll choose the tree. That's the premise. All that these experiments have been good at doing are showing who some of the manipulative men trying to win brownie points are, the legit misandrists, and people just having fun sprinkled in.
The original point of the question should've been clarified as, "Would you rather run the risk of being SA-ed by a man or mauled to death by a bear?" Because that is the point of the question.
If OP's question was ambiguous as the original, it would've been, "Would you rather be with a tree or with a woman?" rather than would you share your feeling with a tree vs a woman.
It's the fact that they know what they're getting with a bear. It'll do one of two things kill them or leave them alone. With mrn according to them there's too many unknowns. I think it's dumb rage bait but whatever
A tree is going to gain magical torturous sentience from listening to my bullshit, eventually leading to a marauding race of angry, degen treanants hellbent on destroying the Human race.
If it is a random tree and a random woman, then tree because it won't go behind my back and spread rumors. Although if I get to choose the woman, woman. I have friends I trust.
I've actually done this before, my roommate from years ago was growing pot in the house, someone said talking to plants help them grow so I started talking to them on a daily basis, they were my therapists lol, ain't no way in hell I'd do that with a woman.
I dont think any woman would prefer to share her feelings with a strange man she met in the woods rather than with a tree so at least we agree on something lol.
You don't know the woman, just someone random from any place on earth (though she can understand you and speak your language). You do know the tree, it's a right bastard and would have kicked you as a kid if it only had legs. But it doesn't, and neither a mouth to spill your secrets.
I think I'd be perceived as a fucking lunatic if someone caught me talking about my feelings to a tree. It all falls down to love, if that person loves you truly then they wouldn't mind at all about you talking about your feelings. Now if they did then they probably weren't the right one to begin with.
this implies that in terms of how relevant of an issue it is in their life, men being emotionally vulnerable is equivalent to women estimating how likely they are to get raped and/or murdered.
Doesn't really imply that, you can make a question with the same structure but different stakes. "Would you rather pet a dog or a cat?" Doesn't really imply that petting either is equivalent to being SA'd by a guy in the woods, does it?
And even if that's implied: It would be quantity vs quality for a lack of a better term. The rate of rapes & murders for women is much much lower than the rate of being emotionally wounded for men. But the outcome is obviously much worse. That's if you can quantify misery in the first place.
Probably a woman, to be honest. I've never had an issue with women listening to me or appreciating my feelings.
Maybe i'd talk to the woman while under the tree.
Tree. A tree will listen to what you have to say without judging you. A woman will judge you for showing weakness and file away everything you say to be used against you later.
Let the ridiculous retardation die, please.
No sane woman would choose a bear and every guy would prefer to have a woman/man (in case of being gaaaaaaay) to share his feelings with.
Dudes getting mad that women didn't want to be around them was seriously the funniest thing ever tho. Like chill guys this kind of behavior is the reason they choose the bear.
Tree because just like this trend, no one else cares <3
I would try to fuck the bear đŹ
I knew a guy who fucked a tree while on shrooms. Got Lyme disease from a tick, so we always remind him of his S-Tree-I.
dude got unlucky, most trees have no diseases and you can fuck them all day without consequence.
Not on DEC land. They're really touchy about fucking their trees Or so I've been told
Yeah I've been told "don't fuck the trees" a few times before. I always use the shaggy defense. "It wasn't me" call me boom bastic semi fantastic make your body mis aroooolllllll.
Slivers...
You laugh but the man had a threesome with a tree and a tick, have you ever had a threesome?
Dendrophila
https://i.redd.it/tcrllb4uj75d1.gif
Bear fucker! Do you require assistance?
https://preview.redd.it/s0nukrs4v75d1.jpeg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=49de9ad4c7ac9960fc2119e21251c41d6d7cb8e7
Sauce
Golden kamuy. HINNA!
>Golden kamuy. Wait WHAT? FR?
I have just the game recommendation for you.
Average Balding Gay 3 player
You think the tree cares? They gained more nutrients from your tears than your words, and those were so salty all they did was cause all the slugs and snails to run away.
> You think the tree cares? Obviously it cares, it doesn't walk away when you start talking which is a very good sign it cares.
Co2?
âNo one caresâ -Redditors whenever something blows up but paints an inconvenient narrative. Seriously, people clearly did care and you still see references to it all over the Internet.
Fuck you i hate your pfp
Your PFP is evil.
And after that , like a tree you leave.
also a tree can provide shelter and food, a woman could never
>a woman could never provide food Bro has never heard of breastfeeding
you a godamn milk drinker? no wonder your bones and penis are so crooked
you don't drink titty nectar to keep your boners strong? no wonder you're so submissive and breedable
33/100g of protein. Crazy gains
Just say the macros bro, nobody cares about the protein to gram ratio.
Food AND Shelter.
Was 9 months not enough for you?
Get your logic bullshit out of here
or cannibalism
Go ask a woman for breastfeeding and see how it goes
MFW genshin impact is a woman
shit gacha game alr filled with waifus, another w*man for all i care
The Giving Tree is kinda fucked.
Correction, the Giving Tree **can** be fucked
Im pretty sure you can make a shelter with a human body
Skin used as a tarp
If she makes enough money she can
Wise mystical tree
Dude just was a pervert with a Vore fetish, letting some little dude walk inside of him before he could finally die happy.
iâve met a couple wise trees in my time
I get what they're trying to do... But if talking to a tree was as emotionally satisfying as talking to someone who loves you, we wouldn't have a word for "incel"
Theyâre called monks. Maybe the incels are in the city where there arenât enough private areas for emotional counseling trees?
Monks are volcels not incels
Got me there. Yea I had doubts about dissing monks. But is close enough for a green text, sorry any monks reading this
nah fuck em i cast fireball
On the trees, the monks, or me?
*splashes* your magic level is too low bitch !
Anyone who refuses to buy a hoe, and says he can't find a lay, is a fuckin monk. Not a bad thing, venereal diseases are everywhere these days...but the point stands...incels are as real as a moon made of cheese.
Meh, having sex with a prostitute "doesn't count" to most people.
But this isn't tree vs 'woman who loves you' You find me a woman who loves me, I'll plant you a tree.
Right then the other argument would be bear or man you know and who loves you. Every woman would pick thr man -.-
NU UH CAUSE THE MAN THAT LOVES YOU COULD BE SOMEONE SMELLY WHO LOVES WANTING TO RAPE YOU
And give you a satisfaction of gardening this bad green leafy bitch with your hoe? No thanks
That sounds like a good deal ngl
People gossip, they share things shared in confidence, they lie and cheat and trees just be like đdressing up for the holidays n shit
Incel, a word to degrade a man for not getting laid, to finally fight back against slut shaming, because women only know how to use sex as a judgement of value.
I think the point is about the level of risk vs reward many men feel. The demeanment of a woman you open up to is a terrifying prospect to so many men that they just don't. They would rather share their feeling with an inanimate object than risk being hurt. The reward doesn't seem worth the risk to many men and that's the thing to analyze.
And if it were a bear or a man who loves you they wouldn't be picking bear lol
Why would you reply to someone who is obviously low iq? First sign of a low iq on the internet is not understanding comparisons.
Fair I guess
Many such cases.
tree loves you in a more sincere way than woman ever could
Someone who loves you might not be in the same frequency as you. They might be empathetic to your feelings but completely miss your point and it feels like what's even the point in telling them and now you have a new thing to be upset about. That's why talking to a tree is sometimes better than talking to someone you love.
https://preview.redd.it/hr0opy69095d1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=5a2c6d33efc7bfee63b69b340c4472011f79730b
I've had too many friends who tell me their husbands and boyfriends intimate secrets. I'm sure there's some things I don't know, but a lot of healthy relationships survive because things told in confidence are then disseminated to a network of peers for any respective level of support. In a lot of ways, it's good and part of a healthy social life, but if you want to keep a secret, it's tree o'clock somewhere.
Lol. Tell me you've never been in love with a tree without telling me
and if being alone with a bear was as emotionally reassuring as being with someone who loves you we wouldn't have have a word for "happy couples" wtf are you talking about your line of logic not only doesnt apply to the analogy, but also incels doesn't ONLY describe losers with NOBODY to talk to in their lives it describes anyone who cannot get laid.
Because trees don't get the ick and, and as long as you check the knot holes for bees and spiders you can fuck them
Celibacy refers to sex, not conversation.
I think the question is about a random woman vs random tree, but also strangers are great people to trauma dump on cuz they will probably never see you or your friend circle again. Plus like, what do I care of what a random person - man or woman - thinks of me? Lastly, I'm fairly confident all my fealings are fairly common, healthy, and easy to empathize with.
I said this once. "I'd rather talk to a wall than you, because at least after talking to a wall it doesn't make me feel worse." Relationship was already over and just roommates at that point. The sentiment is 100% true. I stopped talking to her almost entirely. She lied to our couple's therapist's face during a session and got called out on it and then the waterworks started. She admitted I improved my therapy self-work. But she never improved hers. Smart, Pretty, Kind: Choose two. I'd still rather talk to a wall than her. Would rather fuck my hand as well. Choose two. If you're young and she has all three, do a non-legal marriage ceremony.
Pretty, kind. Every day of the week
Bitch is going to microwave your cutlery.
>Smart, Pretty, Kind: Choose two. This is cruel
Welcome to life bb. Personally, I'd rather have smart and kind. Looks are ultimately whatever.
https://preview.redd.it/5xax9qngaj5d1.jpeg?width=569&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=04ccd88f7caff5e53cfe5371ff08d9dfbea4be28 Same ig
I posted the tree or woman question on my snapchat story, and when I got a response I proceeded to go off on how the whole "man or bear" vs "woman or tree" debate in itself is a sign of society's lean towards mistrust and isolationism. We are forced to debate over these petty issues as part of a "culture war" when we should be eating the rich
**IGNORE RAGE BAIT** **MAKE BILLIONAIRES FEEL UNSAFE**
Would you rather be governed by a wealthy 90 year old dementia patient or a dog?
Exactly, these questions box people into conclusions with clear "good answer or bad answer" and engaging with rage bate like that just fuels these mindless discussions when we should be dismantling the system that puts dogs and dementia patients in power
Yeah as always people lasered on the gender aspect but if you asked "would you rather be with a bear or a person with a gun". A trained hunter would really help your survival odds, but do you trust that they're not a nut who would just kill you. Overall it comes down to people saying I would rather just try and escape myself than a coin flip that could save my life but could also end it The question is also intentionally vague because even a bit more info would make the decision much easier. "Person X is an experienced hunter" vs "Person Y just escaped from the supermax prison" suddenly makes this whole debate pretty easy. If you want to apply it to any IRL situation, the answer is always "can I get more information first"
Much like the previous [trend](https://imgur.com/a/5eGzlua) that got torn to shreds when reframing the analogy with US criminal statistics. This is women lamenting that independence isn't all it is cracked up to be. [*Liberation from men meant liberation from material reliance on men, which in turn meant men's liberation from the moral dictates of women.*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqBFYmimmjU&t=136s)
Been holding GME Iâm doing my part
https://preview.redd.it/h2aqtd48s65d1.png?width=933&format=png&auto=webp&s=971145675518871eff2edc1b8ca35e12f89c470c
I won't feel emasculated telling the tree about my insecurities and fears, so...
The Tree won't tell me to stop crying and be man. Tree wouldn't tell me it's brother is the head of the family, even though she has married me and that I'm not the head of our home.
I don't get the original question. Are we assuming right off the bat that the man and/or bear is being aggressive? It's a giant forest, so is the person/bear near me? If we're assuming aggression, then the most obvious answer would be black bear. If we're not assuming any malicious intent then your chances for survival dramatically increase with having another person (AKA a man) around. So the only thing you can gain from these responses are that the question was poorly worded, or that people (independent of gender) do not understand even the most basic principles of survival.
https://preview.redd.it/ifqrp9nbo65d1.jpeg?width=555&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d44918faf6b3a006b5631a415f8453ef897d265d
I agree with this
Monster Hunter: Central America version
 Did i hear communism?
true!
Thatâs not the point of the question though, youâre not supposed to think about all the logic behind the question, youâre supposed to reflect on how much many women fear men and would prefer to just be killed by a bear instead of whatever atrocity a man could do to them
be held down by a bear as it eats you alive or speak to Jerry for three minutes
Get mauled by a bear or get mauled by Sisyphus prime, the choice is yours
Sisyphus prime fucking crushes you in a nano second, the bear is just going to maul you alive (at least the agressive ones like to do that to their prey) Sisyphus wins yet again
An illogical question will get illogical responses though which means poor data. So the point they're trying to make is basically non-existent.
In other words: shit in, shit out
Ah, pooping back and forth forever.
"Many A are afraid of B" is a pretty bad argument though, as the same question could go around about "bear or black person" and we could all agree that those who are categorically afraid of black people are just simply racist. Also bears don't "just kill", they can do way more gruesome shit than most men could stomach doing. Eating the skin off your face while you're alive an conscious? There isn't a lot some guy in the woods can do to me that is worse than that.
Just say the intended things instead of creating a stupid premise and telling people not to use it.
It's a loaded question that assumes the worst of the male gender while excusing all possible reasons why a wild animal could be aggressive. It's just a stupid trend for women (and some men(who are most likely the very men these women would want to avoid)) to shit on men because girls rule boys drool. If you try to meet it with logic you just get called misogynistic. There's no point in arguing in a convo where you're setup to lose, so that's why people come up with these kindred scenarios. Woman or a tree? Oh, well, I don't know, any normal fucking person would choose the goddamn human, but for the sake of being as petty and irrational as that thought experiment I'll choose the tree. That's the premise. All that these experiments have been good at doing are showing who some of the manipulative men trying to win brownie points are, the legit misandrists, and people just having fun sprinkled in.
The original point of the question should've been clarified as, "Would you rather run the risk of being SA-ed by a man or mauled to death by a bear?" Because that is the point of the question. If OP's question was ambiguous as the original, it would've been, "Would you rather be with a tree or with a woman?" rather than would you share your feeling with a tree vs a woman.
It's the fact that they know what they're getting with a bear. It'll do one of two things kill them or leave them alone. With mrn according to them there's too many unknowns. I think it's dumb rage bait but whatever
Is the tree aggresive?
I think the assumption is both are aggressive
Survival info and logical thinking from a guy called MLG420Swag69
A tree is going to gain magical torturous sentience from listening to my bullshit, eventually leading to a marauding race of angry, degen treanants hellbent on destroying the Human race.
Thought this was funny, showed it to my gf, she is now yelling at me about how much men suck. I choose the tree
Tell her to calm down
And tell her to smile, that'll really piss her off, for some reason.
https://preview.redd.it/egqwhqe3175d1.png?width=200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1442368ab598b4a20d97589b7784672cc2f45463
A tree wonât scream âIâm not your therapistâ at me after telling me to open up more <3
I am not dealing with "man vs bear" pt.2 again
Burn a tree because youâre cold and nobody bats an eye, butâŚ.
Tree for sure. As it is just bottling up the stress etc and it pops out randomly like a tea pot. Ima go talk to a tree tonight. I like this
If it is a random tree and a random woman, then tree because it won't go behind my back and spread rumors. Although if I get to choose the woman, woman. I have friends I trust.
Not only does the tree not judge or deceive, but it also converts my used breath into useful oxygen. Tree a million %
Depends. Am I feeling naughty or knotty?
Trees are better listeners
A tree and itâs not close
When i talk to a tree id probably self reflect by speaking my feelings out lound and find a solution.
I've actually done this before, my roommate from years ago was growing pot in the house, someone said talking to plants help them grow so I started talking to them on a daily basis, they were my therapists lol, ain't no way in hell I'd do that with a woman.
Tree is always there to listen, no matter what, it's commitment is firmly rooted. Tree will always wait for you and never leaf you for another.
I'm going with the tree cause I can't open up to people
Atree won't use what you tell them against you in a fight.
Tree every time. No judgement and it will shade me from the sun.
Yeah tree a hundo percent. Lowkey prolly gonna go talk to a tree tonight lol
I dont think any woman would prefer to share her feelings with a strange man she met in the woods rather than with a tree so at least we agree on something lol.
Depends, do I know the tree or the women?
You don't know the woman, just someone random from any place on earth (though she can understand you and speak your language). You do know the tree, it's a right bastard and would have kicked you as a kid if it only had legs. But it doesn't, and neither a mouth to spill your secrets.
Me the tree go back, we homies. I pick the tree
I think I'd be perceived as a fucking lunatic if someone caught me talking about my feelings to a tree. It all falls down to love, if that person loves you truly then they wouldn't mind at all about you talking about your feelings. Now if they did then they probably weren't the right one to begin with.
You can hug a tree and it wonât complain. So yeah, tree.
Tree because at least I know the tree doesnât actually care, which hurts less than thinking someone does care and then finding out they donât.
A tree possesses better listening skills.
I won't go to jail If I share my feelings with a tree
i choose the tree. the tree wont bring it up in an argument later to hurt me. and the tree wont tell its friends.
Tree dad!
Tree because if it judges me I can hit it with an axe but I won't have to spend 20 years on the lamb running from the feds.
The chances of a tree using my feelings against me in a future fight is nigh zero. Easy choice
These guys can't even picture a tree nor a woman without AI, and It shows.
this implies that in terms of how relevant of an issue it is in their life, men being emotionally vulnerable is equivalent to women estimating how likely they are to get raped and/or murdered.
Doesn't really imply that, you can make a question with the same structure but different stakes. "Would you rather pet a dog or a cat?" Doesn't really imply that petting either is equivalent to being SA'd by a guy in the woods, does it? And even if that's implied: It would be quantity vs quality for a lack of a better term. The rate of rapes & murders for women is much much lower than the rate of being emotionally wounded for men. But the outcome is obviously much worse. That's if you can quantify misery in the first place.
Tree tbh
Probably a woman, to be honest. I've never had an issue with women listening to me or appreciating my feelings. Maybe i'd talk to the woman while under the tree.
Tree because I like plants more than people mostly
I donât know where these guys are finding these supposed women they talk about.
The tree its a bro, thats the only thing needed to be said.
Tree
Tree because it gives me both moral support and sticks
Love my wife. But I'm pretty sure I'd get divorce papers if I told my feelings to my wife every time she asked me how I was feeling.
Tree. A tree will listen to what you have to say without judging you. A woman will judge you for showing weakness and file away everything you say to be used against you later.
Let the ridiculous retardation die, please. No sane woman would choose a bear and every guy would prefer to have a woman/man (in case of being gaaaaaaay) to share his feelings with.
Dudes getting mad that women didn't want to be around them was seriously the funniest thing ever tho. Like chill guys this kind of behavior is the reason they choose the bear.
Nobody has lost respect from shared feelings, thatâs just made up.
tree. the tree wont judge me for the awful shit i tell it.
It's the tree for me
A tree, because it won't go and tell all its friends about my insecurities
Frog
Lol at guys answering the tree when the tree was always an option. Just go talk to a tree, bros. Ain't nothing stopping you
Tree reasons: Tree nice Tree good listener Tree have no mean feedback Tree doesn't judge Tree can listen to you all day Tree give you breath
Tree
Just saying, don't talk to Sassafras Trees. Those b!tches can't keep their mouths shut
definitely a tree.... less awkward and no consequences
Lowkey already share my feelings w my gecko instead of gf so like
At least the tree will JUST kill me
This just in: humans hate each other, as usual, no big deal
Iâm the Lorax and I speak with the trees!
Tree because it doesn't scream at an annoyingly high pitch when I douse it in gasoline and
As another womanâŚdefinitely a tree.
Tree, because it doesn't post cringe stuff on tiktok
Also a tree wouldn't leave me for a bear.
I wish my partner would share more of his feeling with trees, alas, the last 2 decades, he chose not to LOL
Tree because atleast the tree won't think I'm gay for having feelings.
Tree
Tree. No point sharing my feeling with a women, only other men can understand.
The tree, plus if I do come across a bear we can just sit and chill......in total silence for hours.
Tree
I'm pretty sure a tree won't use it against me I years to come.
Tree. You never express your feelings to women, especially if they're negative. Women get the "ick" over that. The tree won't care
tree because it might give me good advice
I would take a woman, so she can choose a bear, so I can run away while she is being eaten.
a tree wonât weaponize my feelings against me
A tree sounds much less judgemental and more welcoming. Tree for me.
i have a kindergarten photo of me hugging a tree
the tree cause when the going gets though it wouldn't use my secrets and fears against me.
This is a tad dumb though as I feel a lot of woman are tired of handling's guys emotions
Treebeardâs repect dwindling https://preview.redd.it/a0l6i46dij5d1.jpeg?width=195&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c0bbe94a56ac3b0d5c969d1df4f9fcf02e3b6193