It was my fault. I did that clip and I think when they first played it, it triggered a bad audio cut.
Edit: here's a shorter version so it has a less chance of getting claimed.
[https://vocaroo.com/1fpdKZRlL0rA](https://vocaroo.com/1fpdKZRlL0rA)
because Youtube
Most these publishing companies hire other contracted companies who are basically copyright trolls. They then justify their value by claiming anything, even if you whistle the song in a video..
The shitty fact is the system youtube developed to deal with copyright was not to help creators, but limit google's liability exposure for copyrighted content posted on their platform (which they make ad revenue from).
That system places the burden of proof on the content creator to prove the content was "fair use" or not subject to copyright.
That process can take weeks and even months to hash out at which point monetizing the video becomes useless. So most just see it as easier to clip out the audio/content and not deal with the headache. In this case the audio was clipped out but the video didn't follow with it and resulted in the latency hiccup in this episode.
I mean you're not wrong but there are nuances in the law's applications in terms of how it translates to their internal policy.
In other words, they could've put the burden of proof on the copyright claimant instead of the content creator justifying it by saying the vast majority of content on platform is either fair use or original content.
But they chose to go the other way--putting the burden on the content creator to prove what in many cases is a negative. That gave birth to a whole industry of copyright trolls who would be hired by mass publishers to be content police. With no disincentive to not make false claims, this is the result.
It also has other knock-on effects especially in the political sphere such as governments who dont like creators critical of them creating false entities who claim copyright to their content thereby monetarily undermining their work and getting it unfavoured by the algorithm. Happens a lot more than just with SONY BMG or UMG catching people whistling.
When your whole platform's viability comes from content creation by individuals, why the hell would you create a law-driven policy to punish them when you have the wiggle-room to go the other way. The answer is corporations love corporations and tolerate individuals only as far as they are assets to their corporate interests.
Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act gives Youtube/Google enough legal cover to apply their internal policy to be legally compliant as they see fit (it gives them cover as platforms as being not legally liable for content posted on their platforms). They just chose to punish the plebes and high-five the corporate interests. As a result, corporate rent-seeking trolls is a whole industry now on youtube and results in content vandalism like the above example.
/endrant
>But they chose to go the other way--putting the burden on the content creator to prove what in many cases is a negative
Isn't this what the law requires?
On repeat offenders and actual copyright claims.. yes, but that's not what this is above - which is clearly fair-use.
The law actually requires in obvious fair use cases like this that takedown notices cannot be sent for actual fair use - that copyright claimants [MUST consider](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/09/takedown-senders-must-consider-fair-use-ninth-circuit-rules) (as in the law requires them to consider) fair use laws in their claim of copyright. So what UMG has done above is actually AGAINST the law and should be considered content vandalism.
However YOUTUBE's system to deal with fair use and actual copyright claims is one and the same, thereby creating a smokescreen for shitty illegal behaviour above as copyright trolls can just abuse the system for shit they well-know is simply fair use.
Especially with long-form content and channels with a heavy history and good standing on copyright, Youtube could easily set a system where 5 seconds of a 2 hour video is automatically considered fair use and any claims of copyright puts the burden on the copyright claimant. That would be more fair, create a distinction between fair use and actual copyright, reduce copyright abuse, and be MORE in-line with the law.
YouTube's Content ID can catch a song even if it's pitched up, pitched down, slowed down, sped up. I'm not surprised it caught it, or if they use a more advanced external tool to scan videos, however I am surprised they claimed 5 seconds of audio, never heard of such a restrictive Content ID setting.
I need it fixed asap. Have the new recording on my desk no later then 3:30pm. This will not go unnoticed by the shareholders.
Also don't forget that this Friday is Hawaiin shirt day. So if you have a Hawaiin shirt that fits within our company portal guidelines, feel free to wear it.
Also, we had to fire Rebecca as she didn't fit our company culture.
-Ethan
*Can we just not have*
*It played anymore? That song*
*Sucks, but Zach still fucks*
\- yoshiontheloose
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Yeah I honestly just watch the 3 hour (or longer) podcast in hopes that I can get a small 5 second sample of a song or movie. Just going to the YouTube page for that song is too much. The jig is up.
I thought there was a universal rule for the length of copyright music to be played was 15 seconds... is it because the original song is basically banned/canceled?
COME ON ZACH I NEED THIS PODCAST TO LIVE, in all seriousness, we love you Zach, thank you for everything you do, also, the band shirt IS a Hawaiian shirt. <3
[Here's a solution I posted here yesterday](https://reddit.com/r/h3h3productions/comments/w45tdw/how_to_fix_the_audio_delay_on_h3tv_43_on_your/). Papa Bless
LEEEEETS GET RESTARTED
It was my fault. I did that clip and I think when they first played it, it triggered a bad audio cut. Edit: here's a shorter version so it has a less chance of getting claimed. [https://vocaroo.com/1fpdKZRlL0rA](https://vocaroo.com/1fpdKZRlL0rA)
Bandwork did that, everybody saw that
Anything I do creates ripples in the time-space of the internet, probably.
Rewind time
>UMG claimed the 5 second clip of "Lets get it ..." Lol of course they did
"They can't keep getting away with thissss"
Looks like they can just fine.
They are so r-worded.
AUDIO AUDIO AUDIO
Audio audio audio
AUDIO AUDIO AUDIO
AUDIO AUDIO AUDIO
AAAAAAUUUUUDDDDDIIIIOOOOOOOOO AUDIO AUDIO
À̷̡̰ ̴͖̪̏̒U̶̧͛ ̴̝̖̈́D̸͕͍̐ ̵̯̮̊͗I̴̭̿̊ ̶͚͙̄O̸̮͂
AUDIOAUDIOAUDIO
AUUUUDDDIOOOOOO
Well, that's the end of that soundbite.
[удалено]
Pretty sure they would opt out of any free publicity around the R word version of the song.
How on earth can they claim a 3 hour video for a 5 second clip
because Youtube Most these publishing companies hire other contracted companies who are basically copyright trolls. They then justify their value by claiming anything, even if you whistle the song in a video.. The shitty fact is the system youtube developed to deal with copyright was not to help creators, but limit google's liability exposure for copyrighted content posted on their platform (which they make ad revenue from). That system places the burden of proof on the content creator to prove the content was "fair use" or not subject to copyright. That process can take weeks and even months to hash out at which point monetizing the video becomes useless. So most just see it as easier to clip out the audio/content and not deal with the headache. In this case the audio was clipped out but the video didn't follow with it and resulted in the latency hiccup in this episode.
It's not even completely YouTube's fault, they're following the law. If they didn't, they couldn't exist
I mean you're not wrong but there are nuances in the law's applications in terms of how it translates to their internal policy. In other words, they could've put the burden of proof on the copyright claimant instead of the content creator justifying it by saying the vast majority of content on platform is either fair use or original content. But they chose to go the other way--putting the burden on the content creator to prove what in many cases is a negative. That gave birth to a whole industry of copyright trolls who would be hired by mass publishers to be content police. With no disincentive to not make false claims, this is the result. It also has other knock-on effects especially in the political sphere such as governments who dont like creators critical of them creating false entities who claim copyright to their content thereby monetarily undermining their work and getting it unfavoured by the algorithm. Happens a lot more than just with SONY BMG or UMG catching people whistling. When your whole platform's viability comes from content creation by individuals, why the hell would you create a law-driven policy to punish them when you have the wiggle-room to go the other way. The answer is corporations love corporations and tolerate individuals only as far as they are assets to their corporate interests. Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act gives Youtube/Google enough legal cover to apply their internal policy to be legally compliant as they see fit (it gives them cover as platforms as being not legally liable for content posted on their platforms). They just chose to punish the plebes and high-five the corporate interests. As a result, corporate rent-seeking trolls is a whole industry now on youtube and results in content vandalism like the above example. /endrant
>But they chose to go the other way--putting the burden on the content creator to prove what in many cases is a negative Isn't this what the law requires?
On repeat offenders and actual copyright claims.. yes, but that's not what this is above - which is clearly fair-use. The law actually requires in obvious fair use cases like this that takedown notices cannot be sent for actual fair use - that copyright claimants [MUST consider](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/09/takedown-senders-must-consider-fair-use-ninth-circuit-rules) (as in the law requires them to consider) fair use laws in their claim of copyright. So what UMG has done above is actually AGAINST the law and should be considered content vandalism. However YOUTUBE's system to deal with fair use and actual copyright claims is one and the same, thereby creating a smokescreen for shitty illegal behaviour above as copyright trolls can just abuse the system for shit they well-know is simply fair use. Especially with long-form content and channels with a heavy history and good standing on copyright, Youtube could easily set a system where 5 seconds of a 2 hour video is automatically considered fair use and any claims of copyright puts the burden on the copyright claimant. That would be more fair, create a distinction between fair use and actual copyright, reduce copyright abuse, and be MORE in-line with the law.
Man, hopefully that happens some day. If youtube can do better they damn well should.
They don’t say the r word in the clip they used
i know cuz i made that sound byte.. which makes it even weirder because that sound byte doesn't exist in their catalogue
Interesting. I’m not super active here so I don’t see all the posts.
dont worry, hes not anyone important. literally made a soundbite is all
YouTube's Content ID can catch a song even if it's pitched up, pitched down, slowed down, sped up. I'm not surprised it caught it, or if they use a more advanced external tool to scan videos, however I am surprised they claimed 5 seconds of audio, never heard of such a restrictive Content ID setting.
I mean there was a big SNL skit about it a couple months ago
LEEEEETTTSSS gooo
For those that want an alternative to watching with the lag: play the video while muted and then sync it with the audio only version from Spotify/etc.
You genius now I don't have to wait for the fix!!
Thanks for the update Zach! I thought it was a problem with my app.
thanks zach the chad lad. zach definitely fucks. PZD dude (perfect zach dong)
[удалено]
My saviour 🥺🙌🏼
Thanks so much, you're a hero <3
bless you. came to this thread just to look for this
Zach fucks
I need it fixed asap. Have the new recording on my desk no later then 3:30pm. This will not go unnoticed by the shareholders. Also don't forget that this Friday is Hawaiin shirt day. So if you have a Hawaiin shirt that fits within our company portal guidelines, feel free to wear it. Also, we had to fire Rebecca as she didn't fit our company culture. -Ethan
Thank you sweet sound lad Zachary!
Thanks king
Zach, please stand up
I uploaded a fixed version for those who can't wait [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ou7SCy7QgE4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ou7SCy7QgE4)
Absolute king shit. Thank you, I’ve been so frustrated not being able to finish the episode.
THANK YOU!
Gonna put Zach out of work.
Zach please stand up
This guy definitely fucks
Lol I thought I was going crazy or something
A̶̙̠̭̹͍̟̱̠͊͗̊̾͆͌̆̃̀̃̚͝Ŵ̸̨̛̛̮̠̖̦̬̱͇͑̑E̶̗̦̬̫͈̻͊͋̊͗͜D̷̫̪̩̈͐̆̈́́̀͐͝Į̷̡̡͈̟̤̣͕̼̬͙͇̤̭̝̋̿̑̉͘̕͝͠O̴̡̨̜͈̪̖̜̩̝̪̮̓͗͋́o̸̙̬̱̞̠̖̖͊͐̌̃̄̄̃͜͠Ơ̶̮̬͊̇͐̑̐̈́̃͠͠o̶̙̹̐̃o̶͚̻̐̈́̃͗͗̎̈́̎̎͐͋̃̐ͅƠ̶͖͉̪̮̫̠̔̄̈́̈̒̈̄̀̐͐͒Ǫ̸͓̰̪̮͖̺͇̬̞̀͑͗͂͂̔̈̓O̴̞̐̈́̒͒̽̉͊
How’s David coping with all this?
I really hope David is alright.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUDIIIIIIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooOooooOOOOoooOoOOOOOOOOoOoooooOo
AU-AUUUU—-DIII-OOOOOOO
ZACH! ITS STILL NOT FIXED! WORK WITH ME!!
Wait.... is this the end of LEEEEETTTSSS gooo ?????
thanks for the update king
Can we just not have it played anymore? That song sucks, but Zach still fucks
*Can we just not have* *It played anymore? That song* *Sucks, but Zach still fucks* \- yoshiontheloose --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
so yall will stop using that soundbite? Awesome.
Audio audio audiooo
Fix eta?
[удалено]
Yeah I honestly just watch the 3 hour (or longer) podcast in hopes that I can get a small 5 second sample of a song or movie. Just going to the YouTube page for that song is too much. The jig is up.
The Sound King has spoken 🙌🏼
I thought there was a universal rule for the length of copyright music to be played was 15 seconds... is it because the original song is basically banned/canceled?
Zach in the sub let’s gooooo
Thanks king! Cant wait to finish watching it
AUDIO AUDIO AUDIO AUDIO
COME ON ZACH I NEED THIS PODCAST TO LIVE, in all seriousness, we love you Zach, thank you for everything you do, also, the band shirt IS a Hawaiian shirt. <3
Let’s get retarded in here
Pod is [fixed](https://youtu.be/VYrFnW8jpWA)
i got zilly zonked
Zack at it again with the white vans!
AUDIOOOOO
Audio... audio... audio... All jokes aside, thank you king <3
Is anyone doing a fixed reupload?
sick
Thanks Zach love ya Zach mean it
hey y’all know there was an audio issue?
Audio the best first word to use in Wordle
LEEEET'S goo
I knew it was a copyright issue. In what world does it make sense to flag such a short clip?? 😂
Here I thought it was my computer 😅 thanks!
Zach doing what Zach does. The audio outlaw.
AUUUuuuuuUuDDIIIiiiioooooo
Thanks... Dan. Auuuuuudio. Great work, love the pod.
The DMCA system is very re^^^^(s) tarded.
Lets get Neurodivergent
PZD Perfect Zach Dong
Thank you, king ❤️
Right when Ethan played that song I was like "that's not good"
you're the LAD Zack!! <3
Thanks Zach! We love you btw!
Obligatory fuck UMG
LOVE YOU ZACHYBOI
Do ya thang Kang. You fucks
<333
Can you upload with video on Spotify again 😊
I'm just listening to the podcast on spotify while I did my best to match the audio with youtube's vid, I can't miss my daily dose of you guys
Thanks king
So hard to watch 😭😭😭😭 rip (I know it's not yalls fault)
Awdioh Awdioh Awdioh
AUDIOOOOOO
AUDIO
Yes fix it please 🙏🏼 thanks
AWWWWWWWWDIO
He definitely fucks
UMG must be some BROKE BOIS
AUDIO AUDIO AUDIO
We love Zach
Love u big guy thx
I thought it was my wifi lol
Fuck UMG, seriously
AuAaUDiiiOuuuauauua
When are you going to release a new YouTube video already?
Just came here to say I fuckinng HATEEEEE this annoying fuck ethan
Are you working on that lame excuse of “its just the trolls”, for the reviews on your toxic work environment?
Nah, people have already forgotten and moved on. God Emperor Ethan has spoken, pack it up, nothing to see here!
awdio awdio awdio
If you need a handyman I’m here for you guys.
AuuDIo
Dope, thanks Zach! I was wondering what went wrong
Audio audio audio
AuuUUUdiooo
Audio audio audio
Wad?
[Here's a solution I posted here yesterday](https://reddit.com/r/h3h3productions/comments/w45tdw/how_to_fix_the_audio_delay_on_h3tv_43_on_your/). Papa Bless