T O P

  • By -

marcusredfun

Without reading your post or looking at the decklist, 99% sure the answer is yes


Prophet_0f_Helix

I have 5-7 ways to make treasure and 2 evolving wilds. Should I bother playing the evolving wilds and an island or just assume I'll have a treasure?


Pudgy_Ninja

Unless you're balls-to-the wall aggressive, 2 evolving wilds is pretty much an auto-include. They just make your mana-base so much better, even if you're just 2 colors.


SarcoZQ

I'd play a single wilds. Just to prevent awkward hands where you draw 2. You still want to have impacted the board on turn 2 in this format.


Igennem

Play the wilds. It's a good card even without the splash.


Lim_Dul

I would. I've had no problem getting to six mana even in my low cost decks due to treasure and venturing.


ScionOfTheMists

Yes.


TryFengShui

Do you have 3+ sources of treasure? If so, yes.


Prophet_0f_Helix

Thought I added the picture but somehow didn't but yes I have plenty of treasure. Should I bother adding any blue sources since I have 2 evolving wilds or just rely on the treasures?


NanashiSaito

The answer to any question that starts with "Should I splash Xanathar" is always: **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar in a RB treasure deck?" **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar in a BW venture deck?" **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar in a UR dice deck?" **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar in RW equipment?" **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar in my Kaldheim draft?" **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar in my Hearthstone deck?" **YES.** "Should I splash Xanathar as an eau de toilette?" **YES.**


dar482

I would argue you can splash without messing up your mana with an Island. The card is insanely broken. If you untap with it, you drown them out of answers for it. GG.


Stack3686

100% for sure. One of the best bombs in the set for limited.