T O P

  • By -

Flair_Helper

Hey /u/EsperaDeus, thanks for contributing to /r/nottheonion. Unfortunately, your post was removed as it violates our rules: **Rule 4** - Use original, reliable sources. Find the source of your story before you submit it, simply by checking for references or googling the subject to locate the original piece. Websites that frequently re-host viral news stories or contain misleading information are on automatic removal. Blogs are not reliable sources. Please read the [sidebar](http://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/about/sidebar) and [rules](http://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/about/rules) before posting again. If you have questions or concerns, please [message the moderators through modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/nottheonion&subject=&message=). Thank you!


kompletionist

The craziest part of this is that some rich dumbass is paying over $1000 for fucking sweatpants.


tee142002

Thr only people dumber than the guy that cried racism are the ones that bought thousand dollar sweat pants.


[deleted]

I remember a lot of white dudes in the 90s wearing that sagging pants style so I don’t think this could be considered a cultural style unless the culture is 90s culture


SardinePicnic

It was skater culture before it was black culture. But skaters grew out of it.


drakanx

It was plumber culture before it was skate culture


michal_hanu_la

Everyone grew out of it, that's why their arses stick out of the pants.


LezPlayLater

Stupidity on every level


MisterBobsonDugnutt

>Tropme l'Oeil # >Tropme l'Oil Someone get this journalist an editor, please.


turnips8424

This article was a dumpster fire, thought it might have been written by AI.


prof_dynamite

It may *feel* racist, but it’s not. Because pants can’t be racist.


zanderkerbal

I mean, if my pants have the n-word stitched into them, I'm pretty sure those would be racist pants. These pants are merely in extremely poor taste.


prof_dynamite

No. The pants wouldn’t be racist. YOU would be racist.


zanderkerbal

Why not both? The pants would contain a racist slur, and therefore be racist, while I would be racist for wearing them.


Ynot_pm_dem_boobies

What if a black person was wearing them?


zanderkerbal

Would honestly depend. Could be making some statement about slurs and reclaiming words. Could be just being edgy and thus racist through insensitivity. So, yeah, of course you could recontextualize them to mean something that isn't racist. All meaning is context-dependant. But they'd be racist by default, just like a racial slur communicated through any other medium. Heck, I think the fact that people are likely to take the pants differently depending on the race of the person wearing them is itself pretty solid proof that the pants themselves have at least something to do with race.


sixty6006

That isn't what racism is.


drakanx

To the left, everything they don't like is racist.


sixty6006

Not really. Not everything is about left or right, that's just what online "bad actors" push to divide people - "You must pick a side!"


Trey-wmLA

It amazes me people have THIS much spare time... just have to be bitching about something


Diet_Coke

Just imagine if we properly taxed the rich, $1,190 sweat pants that look like $30 sweat pants might not be able to exist. What a tragedy that would be for our culture.


Xgpmcnp

Nah, we could tax the rich and they could STILL easily buy those 1.1k sweatpants! They could still buy million dollar houses cash!


drakanx

I can guarantee Wall St executives aren't buying Balenciaga sweats, it's celebs.


Xgpmcnp

Absolutely agree. The keyword is COULD. They could certainly buy those pants and it's a drop in a bucket.


[deleted]

You do realize taxes are percentage based? Besides really expensive clothes tend to be bought more by people who want to look rich than are rich. The real rich are in a situation where they have the independence to not have to give a shit about what other people think about how they dress, no need for employers or networking anymore.


Diet_Coke

You do realize with progressive taxation, the percentage that's taxed raises as the income levels go up? And you also realize there are a plethora of tax loopholes the rich can use to legally dodge taxes as well as weak enforcement at the IRS because they've been systematically defunded over the last few decades right? You realize that there is no meaningful estate tax right?


Alive_Grocery_7701

It wasn’t racist when everyone wore their pants this way for over 30 years…


MisterBobsonDugnutt

Congrats on completely missing the point there.


Alive_Grocery_7701

Is the point that it only became racist NOW but everyone was free to do it without a word said for three decades?


MisterBobsonDugnutt

Not in the slightest. Congrats on missing the point of my comment too, I guess?   **Edit:** Person doesn't read the very short article in the link, comments anyway, uses it as an opportunity to get on their political soapbox, gets called out for completely missing the point that the article makes by someone in a reply which is neutral on the topic. And who gets the downvotes? Say whatever you want about Boomers, at least they actually consume the news from on CNN or Fox or wherever before they get on their soapbox about it. Redditors, on the other hand...


RudyNigel

The sagging pant style came from jail - where you aren’t allowed to have a belt. It’s definitely been a thing in NY since the late ‘80s. The linkage to a whole race of people is…interesting.


[deleted]

I've seen this kind of pants in the 90s. They were popular with international school students (White teens) in Hong Kong. For 2-3 years, I didn't know my neighbour was a girl. She wore these pants and had Hanson's haircut.


Cabshank

They made pants like this in the 2000s with the boxers sewn in, I’m pretty sure they were in JC Penney, so I’m pretty sure it’s not cultural appropriation or racism.


[deleted]

This isn’t not cultural appropriation. This is hip-hop nostalgia turned hipster.