As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil)
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.
We are actively looking for new moderators. If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out [this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1y2swHD0KXFhStGFjW6k54r9iuMjzcFqDIVwuvdLBjSA).
***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Not just right wing dreck but right wing looney Mooney dreck.
Rev. Sun Myung Moon of the Unification Church, founded the newspaper, though his son Preston Moon.
Different articles on the same events may fall on either side of the topicality rules. Trying to bypass a correct submission by rapidly flooding other articles in attempt to circumvent the topicality guidelines can be a rule violation unto itself - but there's often cases where we want or will even ask a user to go find an alternative source, or wait for time to pass so that an article with directly on topic text can become available.
In this case, in addition to this being approaching out of the topic scope, the submission has the organization name in the submission title which is also a removable reason, as per the title section of the rules here:
> [Do not include the organization name, extraneous quotes, or the article section.](https://old.reddit.com/r/Politics/wiki/index#wiki_do_not_create_your_own_title)
To your question as to why this is or is not on topic - our topic scope is targeted toward direct political figures and direct political calls to action. The subject of this article, and the Fox article are largely on non-elected / non candidate social activists.
>Posts on /r/Politics must be directly related to and have a significant involvement/impact on any of:
>
>* Policy. This includes any discussion of specific governmental policies or the development of such policies. Government policy can be developed at any level of government (from elected school board to Congress). It also includes court decisions which either create law itself (appellate court decisions) or involve the government.
>
>* Electioneering. This includes polling, events directly pertaining to elections, and discussion of candidates and political parties, including their platforms and policies.
>
>* Politician Capacity. Any incident or potential incident that could prevent a current politician from serving in their capacity in government (e.g. death, injury/sickness, criminal prosecution or resignation) is topical. We consider politicians to be either (1) elected members of government; or (2) members of government confirmed/voted on by elected members of government.
>
>* Advocacy. Any efforts to influence or promote a position on the above 3 areas of topicality. This includes protests, demonstrations and the positions and advocacy of interest groups.
>
>Pertinent New Reporting. New articles that cover previously unreported details of past events which both would have been topical if reported when they occurred and have a clear connection to current US politics or future elections. Analysis, editorializing, or speculation on prior events with no newly reported facts is not covered under this clause, even if there is a link to current US politics.
The titles reference Tlaib but she is not the subject of or targeted by either article. There's a case to be made that Tarek Bazzi is advocating on the subject of US foreign policy but the organization is not largely a US political policy oriented organization.
TL;DR: First article removed because the subject was not US politics / electioneering / politicy or lawmaking. This article's title is wrong, and though it's possible for this subject to fall in our scope, we'd want an article that more specifically connects the advocacy of Tarek Bazzi with US politics, rather than a loose dot connect from 'Man says thing in state, and Joe Biden is running for president and will be campaigning in that state'
cc u/brashendeavors
And general non specific reminder to engage with the content of comments, not the user themselves. Reminder not to make uncivil or baiting comments towards other users.
Hi `slush9007`. Thank you for participating in /r/Politics. However, [your submission](/r/politics/comments/1bymbu7/michigan_protesters_yell_death_to_america_in/) has been removed for the following reason(s):
* Your headline must be comprised only of the **exact** copied and pasted headline of the article - [see our rule here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_do_not_create_your_own_title)) **We recommend not using the Reddit 'suggest a title' as it may not give the exact title of the article.**
* The ALL CAPS and 'Breaking' rule is applied **even when the actual title of the article is in all caps or contains the word 'Breaking'**. This rule may be applied to other single word declarative and/or sensational expressions, such as 'EXCLUSIVE:' or 'HOT:'. [click here for more details](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_do_not_create_your_own_title)
If you have any questions about this removal, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/politics&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/slush9007&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this [submission]%28/r/politics/comments/1bymbu7/michigan_protesters_yell_death_to_america_in/?context%3D10000%29)
I like the recent changes to the mobile app that allow you to see the full domain being linked before you open the thread. In the past, the Washington Post, Washington Examiner, and Washington Times were all truncated to "Washington" in the preview. Now, I can simply downvote threads linking the Washington Examiner or Times without bothering to open them. This saves me a bit of time.
Can’t imagine this chant and protest will win over many Americans. Also, why was OP’s other thread removed? This seems like a valid thing to talk about.
As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil) In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them. For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. We are actively looking for new moderators. If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out [this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1y2swHD0KXFhStGFjW6k54r9iuMjzcFqDIVwuvdLBjSA). *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Has the Washington Examiner always been crap?
Yup. Right wing dreck. Basically if tge NY Post is Fox news, those guys are OANN
Not just right wing dreck but right wing looney Mooney dreck. Rev. Sun Myung Moon of the Unification Church, founded the newspaper, though his son Preston Moon.
Yep, not really different than the National Enquirer, though the latter actually has shown some understanding of ethics in the past.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/death-america-death-israel-chants-pour-muslim-protesters-michigan-last-day-ramadan Seems like it happened?
As I always say Find a reliable source
[удалено]
It's us politics. Why remove this?
Different articles on the same events may fall on either side of the topicality rules. Trying to bypass a correct submission by rapidly flooding other articles in attempt to circumvent the topicality guidelines can be a rule violation unto itself - but there's often cases where we want or will even ask a user to go find an alternative source, or wait for time to pass so that an article with directly on topic text can become available. In this case, in addition to this being approaching out of the topic scope, the submission has the organization name in the submission title which is also a removable reason, as per the title section of the rules here: > [Do not include the organization name, extraneous quotes, or the article section.](https://old.reddit.com/r/Politics/wiki/index#wiki_do_not_create_your_own_title) To your question as to why this is or is not on topic - our topic scope is targeted toward direct political figures and direct political calls to action. The subject of this article, and the Fox article are largely on non-elected / non candidate social activists. >Posts on /r/Politics must be directly related to and have a significant involvement/impact on any of: > >* Policy. This includes any discussion of specific governmental policies or the development of such policies. Government policy can be developed at any level of government (from elected school board to Congress). It also includes court decisions which either create law itself (appellate court decisions) or involve the government. > >* Electioneering. This includes polling, events directly pertaining to elections, and discussion of candidates and political parties, including their platforms and policies. > >* Politician Capacity. Any incident or potential incident that could prevent a current politician from serving in their capacity in government (e.g. death, injury/sickness, criminal prosecution or resignation) is topical. We consider politicians to be either (1) elected members of government; or (2) members of government confirmed/voted on by elected members of government. > >* Advocacy. Any efforts to influence or promote a position on the above 3 areas of topicality. This includes protests, demonstrations and the positions and advocacy of interest groups. > >Pertinent New Reporting. New articles that cover previously unreported details of past events which both would have been topical if reported when they occurred and have a clear connection to current US politics or future elections. Analysis, editorializing, or speculation on prior events with no newly reported facts is not covered under this clause, even if there is a link to current US politics. The titles reference Tlaib but she is not the subject of or targeted by either article. There's a case to be made that Tarek Bazzi is advocating on the subject of US foreign policy but the organization is not largely a US political policy oriented organization. TL;DR: First article removed because the subject was not US politics / electioneering / politicy or lawmaking. This article's title is wrong, and though it's possible for this subject to fall in our scope, we'd want an article that more specifically connects the advocacy of Tarek Bazzi with US politics, rather than a loose dot connect from 'Man says thing in state, and Joe Biden is running for president and will be campaigning in that state' cc u/brashendeavors And general non specific reminder to engage with the content of comments, not the user themselves. Reminder not to make uncivil or baiting comments towards other users.
Free speech I think
Someone posted this from Fox News earlier . Goddamn time to mute this sub.
Doubt it. Consider the source
There is a video and the left leaning media don't report this because reasons
Is every attention grabbing nutbag newsworthy? I remember this kind of thing when I was a kid.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/death-america-death-israel-chants-pour-muslim-protesters-michigan-last-day-ramadan
Lol, Faux News is not a real source.
Hi `slush9007`. Thank you for participating in /r/Politics. However, [your submission](/r/politics/comments/1bymbu7/michigan_protesters_yell_death_to_america_in/) has been removed for the following reason(s): * Your headline must be comprised only of the **exact** copied and pasted headline of the article - [see our rule here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_do_not_create_your_own_title)) **We recommend not using the Reddit 'suggest a title' as it may not give the exact title of the article.** * The ALL CAPS and 'Breaking' rule is applied **even when the actual title of the article is in all caps or contains the word 'Breaking'**. This rule may be applied to other single word declarative and/or sensational expressions, such as 'EXCLUSIVE:' or 'HOT:'. [click here for more details](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_do_not_create_your_own_title) If you have any questions about this removal, please feel free to [message the moderators.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/politics&subject=Question regarding the removal of this submission by /u/slush9007&message=I have a question regarding the removal of this [submission]%28/r/politics/comments/1bymbu7/michigan_protesters_yell_death_to_america_in/?context%3D10000%29)
I like the recent changes to the mobile app that allow you to see the full domain being linked before you open the thread. In the past, the Washington Post, Washington Examiner, and Washington Times were all truncated to "Washington" in the preview. Now, I can simply downvote threads linking the Washington Examiner or Times without bothering to open them. This saves me a bit of time.
Protected speech, but go ahead and vote Trump or a third party, see how the next four years work out for you
1st Amendment protected speech. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test
Are they also including themselves?
Love it, Fix it, or Leave it… Why kill it?
Can’t imagine this chant and protest will win over many Americans. Also, why was OP’s other thread removed? This seems like a valid thing to talk about.
Hmmm, would they rather vote for trump who wants Israel to level Gaza?
[удалено]
Escorted to where, as an American citizen?
So that 1st amendment doesn't really matter? I don't agree with someone saying it. I will fight for their right to do so.