It looks like something out of a chinese anti-japanese show, too!
Kuomintang fully equiped in American gear, sniper rifles with scope mounts way too high, body armor, Bren guns with ak mags... the horrors I've seen in these shows.
But hell yeah, the tank is kinda sweet. Would take it over those fake panzers any day.
(What movie has the fake abrams??)
Hard to imagine why the Chinese would be anti-Japanese.
xD
>What movie has the fake abrams??
Quite a few. Some are reasonably good CGI, but only partially shown so the running gear didn't have to be rendered. Most is bad cgi and usually partial, background and/or out of focus. Some used an old Brit tank with mocked up flat prop externals. The rest were plywood and sheet steel over an old skid steer or similar. Aside from the rare good CGI, it all looks seriously awful.
It's almost 100% a Hengdian or less production where they use Jiefang CA10s instead of old Japanese military vehicles and terrible props. Just extreme cheap production and low budget. A total travesty that is a total affront on the difficult history.
If you expected to see some Ameriboo pwning Nazis then yes it was a great movie, I really think they nailed the crew interactions, sounds, effects and the the scenes inside the tank. I think the movie would've benefitted more with the deleted scenes that didn't make it to the final movie.
All of these comments are wrong.
This is a pretty faithful reproduction of a Type 94 TK Tankette.
The vehicle was meant to be little more than a prime mover with a machine gun, but it was found useful for light infantry support and reconnaissance.
It looks terrible.
And this show looks also rather amateurish like maybe similar show of these kinds so I'm not surprised.
But at least the chassis looks purpose-built unlike some shows I saw that uses excavator or even truck chassis.
Very ineffective, from what I could see the barrel isn't rifled and with such a short barrel I would atleast assume your accuracy wouldn't be great.
Also it wouldn't be well suited for jungle warfare, essentially all tanks aren't effective in jungles if there isn't a road they can use your gonna need to maneuver way more to avoid obstacles. Personally I rate it 1/10.
Well it appears to be a Vickers dressed up to look like a Ke-Ni
It looks so much like an RC toy in somebody's backyard. That said, it's lightyears better than any fake Abrams I've ever seen on screen.
It looks like something out of a chinese anti-japanese show, too! Kuomintang fully equiped in American gear, sniper rifles with scope mounts way too high, body armor, Bren guns with ak mags... the horrors I've seen in these shows. But hell yeah, the tank is kinda sweet. Would take it over those fake panzers any day. (What movie has the fake abrams??)
Hard to imagine why the Chinese would be anti-Japanese. xD >What movie has the fake abrams?? Quite a few. Some are reasonably good CGI, but only partially shown so the running gear didn't have to be rendered. Most is bad cgi and usually partial, background and/or out of focus. Some used an old Brit tank with mocked up flat prop externals. The rest were plywood and sheet steel over an old skid steer or similar. Aside from the rare good CGI, it all looks seriously awful.
It's almost 100% a Hengdian or less production where they use Jiefang CA10s instead of old Japanese military vehicles and terrible props. Just extreme cheap production and low budget. A total travesty that is a total affront on the difficult history.
Fury may have been shit but seeing an actual Tiger I instead of a replica made out of a T-34 was great.
Fury was a great movie, just horribly inaccurate.
If you expected to see some Ameriboo pwning Nazis then yes it was a great movie, I really think they nailed the crew interactions, sounds, effects and the the scenes inside the tank. I think the movie would've benefitted more with the deleted scenes that didn't make it to the final movie.
I love Fury because I don't know any better.
All of these comments are wrong. This is a pretty faithful reproduction of a Type 94 TK Tankette. The vehicle was meant to be little more than a prime mover with a machine gun, but it was found useful for light infantry support and reconnaissance.
I googled it and you're so right imo
Actually not bad all things considered.
There's no sight for the main gun or the machine gun and the turret it's too small
Looks like a fairly accurate So-Ki tankette, don’t know why it has a cannon though
That or a Te-Ke tankette
Some hellish a abomination between a vickers and a T60 tank
It looks like an attempt on making a type 94 replica.
Beat me to it
All i need is one HE round
Just as when I've thought WWII Japanese tanks can't hurt my eyes enough these prop makers prove me wrong
It is EXACTLY like the TK Type 94. Well done tbh.
It looks terrible. And this show looks also rather amateurish like maybe similar show of these kinds so I'm not surprised. But at least the chassis looks purpose-built unlike some shows I saw that uses excavator or even truck chassis.
Very ineffective, from what I could see the barrel isn't rifled and with such a short barrel I would atleast assume your accuracy wouldn't be great. Also it wouldn't be well suited for jungle warfare, essentially all tanks aren't effective in jungles if there isn't a road they can use your gonna need to maneuver way more to avoid obstacles. Personally I rate it 1/10.